Magnetic resonance-assisted imaging of slow flow in the pancreatic and common bile duct in healthy volunteers

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 48, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 943-947

  Hellund, J C ^a   Storaas, T ^b   Gjesdal, K I ^b   Klow, N E ^b   Geitung, J T ^b  

^a ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Bile duct; Magnetic resonance imaging; MR diffusion perfusion; Pancreatic duct

Indexed keywords

ENZYMES; FLOW VELOCITY; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

FLOW SENSITIVITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATICOGRAPHY; PANCREATIC DUCT; SIGNAL LOSS;

LIVING SYSTEMS STUDIES;

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; GLUCAGON; SECRETIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BILE DUCT; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PANCREAS DUCT; PHYSIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BILE DUCTS; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; GLUCAGON; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; PANCREATIC DUCTS; SECRETIN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 35648945386     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850701477694     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, Heras I, Cabriada JL, Bernai A, et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:422-8.
2. Dumoulin Cl, Souza SP, Walker MF, Wagle W. Three-dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Med 1989;9:139-49.
3. Erlinger S. Physiology of bile flow. Prog Liver Dis 1972;4:63-82.
4. Fayad LM, Kowalski T, Mitchell DG. MR cholangiopancreatography: evaluation of common pancreatic diseases. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:97-114.
5. Gjesdal KI, Hellund JC, Storaas T, Geitung JT. A new pulse sequence to visualize slow flow. Magma 2004;17:68-73.
6. Hellund JC, Labori KJ, Bjornbeth BA, Gjesdal KI, Geitung JT. MRI of slow flow in artificial duct in swine. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1692-7.
7. Heverhagen JT, Muller D, Battmann A, Ishaque N, Boehm D, Katschinski, et al. MR hydrometry to assess exocrine function of the pancreas: initial results of noninvasive quantification of secretion. Radiology 2001;218:61-7.
8. Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane M, Toda N, Sasahira N, Nakai Y, et al. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed- tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:271-5.
9. Le Bihan D. Molecular diffusion nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1991;7:1-30.
10. Matos C, Metens T, Deviere J, Nicaise N, Braude P, Van Yperen G, et al. Pancreatic duct: morphologic and functional evaluation with dynamic MR pancreatography after secretin stimulation. Radiology 1997;203: 435-41.
11. Matos C, Winant C, Delhaye M, Deviere J. Functional MRCP in pancreatic and periampullary disease. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2001;30:5-18.
12. Nyberg B. Bile secretion in man. The effects of somatostatin, vasoactive intestinal peptide and secretin. Acta Chir Scand 1990;557:1-40.
13. Paley MR, Nicolas AI, Mergo PJ, Torres GM, Burton SS, Ros PR. Low density barium and bentonite mixture versus high density barium: a comparative study to optimize negative gastrointestinal contrast agents for MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:1033-6.
14. Papanikolaou N, Karantanas A, Maris T, Gourtsoyiannis N. MR cholangiopancreatography before and after oral blueberry juice administration. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24:229-34.
15. Paumgartner G, Sauerbruch T. Secretion, composition and flow of bile. Clin Gastroenterol 1983;12:3-23.
16. Pelc NJ, Shimakawa A, Glower G. Phase contrast cine MRI. In: Book of abstracts. Berkeley: Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine; 1989. p. 101.
17. Punwani S, Gillams AR, Lees WR. Non-invasive quantification of pancreatic exocrine function using secretin-stimulated MRCP. Eur Radiol 2003;13:273-6.
18. Riordan RD, Khonsari M, Jeffries J, Maskell GF, Cook PG. Pineapple juice as a negative oral contrast agent in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a preliminary evaluation. Br J Radiol 2004;77:991-9.
19. Sica GT, Braver J, Cooney MJ, Miller FH, Chai JL, Adams DF. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with MR cholangiopancreatography in patients with pancreatitis. Radiology 1999;210:605-10.
20. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys 1965;42:288-92.