Major oil exporters may profit rather than lose, in a carbon-constrained world

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 6346-6353

  Persson, Tobias A ^a   Azar, C ^a   Johansson, D ^a   Lindgren, K ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Climate policy; Oil; OPEC

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMERCE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; TAXATION;

NET PRESENT VALUE; OIL EXPORTERS; ORGANIZATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES;

PETROLEUM INDUSTRY;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CLIMATE CHANGE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEVELOPING WORLD; ENERGY MARKET; ENERGY POLICY; ENERGY USE; MITIGATION; OPEC; PROFITABILITY;

EID: 35648938176     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.06.027     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Åhman, M., 2003. Cars in transition-an assessment of future vehicle technologies. Ph.D. Thesis, Environmental and Energy System Studies, Lund University, Sweden.
2. Alhajji A.F., and Huettner D. OPEC and world crude oil markets from 1973 to 1994: cartel, oligopoly, or competitive?. Energy Journal 21 (2000) 31-60
3. Azar, C., Lindgren, K., Andersson, B., 2000. Hydrogen or methanol in the transportation sector-a global scenario study. Report to The Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board, 69pp.
4. 2 constraints-cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 961-976
5. Azar C., Lindgren K., Larsson E., and Möllersten K. Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass-costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Climatic Change 74 (2006) 47-79
6. Barnett J., Dessai S., and Webber M. Will OPEC lose from the Kyoto Protocol?. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 2077-2088
7. Bartsch U., and Müller B. Fossil Fuels in a Changing Climate (2000), Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
8. Bentley R.W. Global oil and gas depletion: an overview. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 189-205
9. Bernstein, P., Montgomery, D., Rutherford, T., Yang, G., 1999. Effects of restrictions on international permit trading: the MS-MRT model. The Energy Journal (special issue edited by J. Weyant), pp. 221-256.
10. BGR. Availability of Energy Reserves and Resources 1998 (1998), Hannover, Germany
11. BP, 2006. Statistical Review of World Energy 2006.
12. Campbell C.J., and Laherrere J.H. The end of cheap oil. Scientific American 278 3 (1998) 78-83
13. Ghanem S., Lounnas R., and Rennand G. The impact of emissions trading on OPEC. OPEC Review 23 (1999) 79-112
14. Grubb M. Who's afraid of atmospheric stabilization? Making the link between energy resources and climate change. Energy Policy 29 (2001) 837-845
15. Hatfield C.B. Oil back on the global agenda. Nature 387 (1997) 121
16. van den Have S., le Menestrel M., and De Bettignies H.C. The oil industry and climate change: strategies and ethical dilemmas. Climate Policy 2 (2002) 3-18
17. Hedenus F., Azar C., and Lindgren K. Induced technological change in a limited foresight optimization model. Energy Journal 27 (2005) 109-122
18. IEA. Resources to Reserves: Oil and Gas Technologies for the Energy Markets of the Future (2005), International Energy Agency, Paris, France
19. IPCC, 1997. Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories-vol. 2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
20. Johansson, D., Azar, C., Lindgren, K., Persson, T.A., 2006. OPEC oil revenue in carbon constraint scenarios-the role of market power. Working Paper, Physical Resource Theory, Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden.
21. Karas, J., Bosteels, T., Müller, B., 2005. OPEC and climate change: challenges and opportunities. Report, November 2005, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, UK.
22. Lloyd A.C. The power plant in your basement. Scientific American 289 1 (1999) 49-64
23. Masters, C.D., Attanasi, E.D., Root, D.H., 1994. World petroleum assessment and analysis. In: Procedings of the 14th World Petroleum Congress. Wiley, New York.
24. McKibbin, W., Ross, T., Shackleton, R., Wilcoxen, P., 1999. Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto Protocol. The Energy Journal (special issue edited by J. Weyant), pp. 287-335.
25. Pershing J. Fossil fuel implications of climate change mitigation responses. In: Berstein LJ., and Pan J. (Eds). Sectoral Economic Costs and Benefits of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation (2000), IPCC, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
26. Persson T.A., and Azar C. The cost of meeting the Kyoto Protocol: dealing with the carbon surplus in Russia and the Ukraine. Management of Environmental Quality 14 4 (2003) 488-507
27. 2 emission permits-economic incentives for emission reductions in developing countries. Energy Policy 34 (2006) 1889-1899
28. Radetzki M. What will happen to the producer prices for fossil fuels if Kyoto is implemented?. Energy Policy 30 (2002) 357-369
29. Smith J.L. Inscrutable OPEC? Behavioral tests of the Cartel hypothesis. Energy Journal 26 (2005) 51-82
30. United States Geological Survey (USGS). World Petroleum Assessment 2000 (2000), USGS, Washington
31. van Vuuren, D.P., den Elzen, M.G.J., Berk, M.M., Lucas, P., Eickhout, B., Eerens, H., Oostenrijk, R., 2003. Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes: comparison of variants of the multi-stage and per capita convergence regime. Report 728001025, RIVM, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
32. WBGU. Climate Protection Strategies for the 21st Century: Kyoto and Beyond (2003), German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin, Germany
33. WEC, 2002. Global oil shale issues and perspectives. Synthesis of the symposium on oil shale, Tallin (Estonia), 18 and 19 November. World Energy Council, Geneva.