New perspectives and challenges for the design and production of S&T indicators

Research Evaluation

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 33-44

  Lepori, Benedetto ^a,b   Barré, Rémi ^c   Filliatreau, Ghislaine ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LUGANO   (Switzerland)

^b Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques OST   (France)

^c Bioinformatique et Chimie Moléculaire   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35648933428     PISSN: 09582029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/095820208X291176     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Archambault, E and E Vignola Gagné 2004 The Use of Bibliometrics in Social Sciences and Humanities. Report for the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, Montréal.
2. Auriol, L 2006 International Mobility of Doctorate Holders: First Results and Methodology Advances. Paper presented at the first PRIME Indicators Conference, Lugano, November 2006.
3. Barré, R 2001 Sense and nonsense of S&T productivity indicators. Science and Public Policy, 28(4), 259-266.
4. Barré, R 2004 The Agora Model of S&T indicators. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. Barré, R 2006 Towards a European STI Indicators Platform (ESTIP). Position paper, presented and discussed at the second PRIME annual conference, Paris, February 2006.
6. Benner, M and U Sandström 2000 Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29(2), 291-301.
7. Bonaccorsi, A 2005 Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science. Paper presented to the PRIME, General Assembly. Manchester.
8. Bonaccorsi, A and C Daraio eds. 2007 Universities as Strategic Units: Productivity and Efficiency Patterns in the European University System. Edward Elgar, forthcoming.
9. Bonaccorsi, A, C Daraio, B Lepori and S Slipersaeter 2007 Indicators for the analysis of higher education systems: some methodological reflections. Research Evaluation, forthcoming.
10. Borras, S 2004 System of innovation theory and the European Union, Science and Public Policy, 31(6), 425-433.
11. Borras, S and K Jacobson 2004 The open method of coordination and the new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185-208.
12. Braun, D 2006 Delegation in the distributive policy arena: the case of research policy. In Delegation in Contemporary Democracies, eds. D Braun and F Gilardi. Routledge: London.
13. Bundesministerium für Bildung, Wissenschaft und Kultur 2007 Österreichischer Forschungs- und Technologiebericht 2007. Wien.
14. Campbell, H 2002 Evidence-based policy: the continuing search for effective policy processes. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1), 89-90.
15. Caracostas, P and U Muldur 2001 The emergence of a new European Union research and innovation policy. In Research and Innovation Policies in the New Global Economy: an International Comparative Analysis, eds. P Larédo and P Mustar, pp. 157-204. Edward Elgar.
16. Charles, D, B Perry and P Benneworth 2004 Towards a Multilevel Science Policy: Regional Science Policy in a European Context. Regional Studies Associations.
17. Da Costa, O, P Laget, P Moguerou, S Robinson and F Barjak 2006 Some Recent Results on the Financing of Doctoral Students and Postdoctoral Researchers in Life Sciences. Paper presented at the first PRIME Indicators Conference, Lugano, November 2006.
18. Dietz, J and B Bozeman 2005 Academic careers, patents, and productivity industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34, 349-367.
19. Esterle, L and G Filliatreau eds. 2004 Indicateurs de S&T, Edition 2004. Paris: Economica.
20. Esterle, L and J Theves 2005 Analysis of the Different European Systems for Producing Indicators. Paper presented at the Lisbon Workshop on S&T Indicators Production, Lisbon, 22-23 September 2005.
21. Etzkovitz, H and L Leyesdorff 2000 The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
22. European Commission 2002 Towards a European Research Area: Science, Technology and Innovation, Key Figures. Bruxelles.
23. European Commission 2003 Third European S&T Indicators Report. Luxembourg.
24. European Commission and Eurostat 2004 Innovation in Europe: Results for the EU, Iceland and Norway, Data 1998-2001. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
25. Federal Ministry of Research and Education 2001 Germany's Technological Performance 2001. Berlin.
26. Filliatreau, G ed. 2006 Indicateurs de S&T, Edition 2006. Paris: Economica.
27. Foray, D 2006 Enriching the Indicator Base for the Economics of Knowledge. Paper presented at the Blue Sky Conference, Ottawa, September 2006.
28. Gaughan, M and B Bozeman 2002 Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation, 11(1), 17-26.
29. Georghiou, L and P Larédo 2006 Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research: Recent Trends and Perspectives. DSTI/DSP, (2006)7.
30. Gibbons, M, C Limoges, H Nowotny, S Schwartzmann, P Scott and M Trow 1994 The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.
31. Gilardi, F 2006 Delegation to independent regulatory agencies in Western Europe: credibility, political uncertainty, and diffusion. In Delegation in Contemporary Democracies, eds. D Braun and F Gilardi. Routledge: London.
32. Glänzel, W and A Schubert 2004 Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 257-276. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
33. Godin, B 2005a The Input-Output Framework: an Accounting Metaphor. Paper presented at the ENIP/PRIME international workshop, "S&T indicators for policy analysis: needs, status and new developments", Lisbon, 22-23 September 2005.
34. Godin, B 2005b Measurement and Statistics on Science and Technology. London: Routledge.
35. Grupp, H, I Dominguez Lacasa, M Friedrich-Nishio and A Jungmittag 2004 Innovation and growth in Germany in the past 150 years. In Entrepreneurship, the New Economy and Public Policy, eds. U Cantner, E Dinopoulos and R F Lanzillotti, pp. 267-289. Berlin: Springer.
36. Hicks, D 2004 The four literatures of social science. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 473-496. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
37. Irvine, J, B Martin and P Isard 1990 Investing in the Future: An International Comparison of Government Funding of Academic and Related Research. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
38. Jacso, P 2005 As we may search: comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases. Current Science, 89(9), 1537-1547.
39. Katz, S and V Cothey 2006 Web indicators for complex innovation systems. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 85-96.
40. Kuhlmann, S 2001 Governance of innovation policy in Europe: three scenarios. Research Policy, 30(6), 953-976.
41. Kuhlmann, S et al 1999 Improving distributed intelligence in complex innovation systems. ASTPP network - TSER contract SOE1-CT96-1013. In Strategic Policy Intelligence: Current Trends, the State of Play and Perspectives, eds. A Tubke, K Ducatel, J Gavigan and P Moncada. JRC-ESTO, EUR 20137 EN.
42. Larédo, P 2004 The evaluation of ECRTD activities. Contribution to the conference: Evaluations in the ERA, Maastricht, 27 October 2004.
43. Larédo, P and P Mustar 2000 Laboratory activity profiles: an exploratory approach. Scientometrics, 47(3), 515-539.
44. Lepori, B 2006a Methodologies for the analysis of research funding and expenditures. Research Evaluation, 15(2), 133-143.
45. Lepori, B 2006b Public research funding and research policy: a long-term analysis for the Swiss case. Science and Public Policy, 33(3), 205-216.
46. Lepori, B, M Dinges, B Poti, E Reale, S Slipersaeter, J Theves, P van den Besselaar and B van der Meulen 2007 Indicators for comparative analysis of public project funding: concepts, implementation and evaluation. Research Evaluation, forthcoming.
47. Leydesdorff, L and S Cozzens 1993 The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI. Scientometrics, 26, 133-154.
48. Lundvall, B-Å ed. 1989 National Innovation Systems: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter.
49. Maassen, P 2003 Shifts in governance arrangements. In The Higher Education Managerial Revolution?, eds. A Amaral et al, pp. 31-53. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
50. Merkx, F and P van den Besselaar 2008 Indicators for disciplinary challenge and disciplinary change: the Dutch coastal defense research case. Research Evaluation, 17(1), March, 4-16.
51. Meyer, M, T Sinilainen and J Utecht 2003 Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: a study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
52. Meyer-Kramer, F and G Reger 1999 New perspectives on the innovation strategies of multinational enterprises: lessons for technology policy in Europe. Research Policy, 28, 751-776.
53. Moed, H F, A J Nederhof and M Luwel 2002 Towards performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50, 498-520.
54. Moed, H, W Glänzel and U Schmoch 2004 Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
55. Narin, F 1994 Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30, 147-155.
56. Nederhof, A 2006 Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: a review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
57. Nelson, R ed. 1992 National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Noyons, E 2004 Science maps within a science policy context. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 237-256. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1997 Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data, 2nd edn. Paris: OECD.
60. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002 Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development, 2nd edn. Paris: OECD.
61. OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2003 Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2003. Paris: OECD.
62. Probst, C and B Lepori 2007 Using Curriculum Vitae for Mapping Scientific Fields: a Small-scale Experience for Swiss Communication Sciences. Paper presented at the ISSI Conference, Madrid, June 2007.
63. Schmoch, U 2004 The technological output of scientific institutions. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 717-732. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
64. Sirilli, G 2006 Developing Science And Technology Indicators at the OECD: the NESTI Network. Paper presented at the first PRIME indicators Conference, Lugano, November 2006.
65. Thelwall, M 2004 Link Analysis: an Information Science Approach. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
66. Tijssen, R 2004 Measuring and evaluating science-technology connections and interactions. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 695-716. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
67. Uyarra, E, K Koschatzky and J-A Héreaud 2007 Understanding the Multi-Level, Multi-Actor Governance of Regions for Developing New Policy Design. PRIME position paper.
68. Van der Meulen, B and A Rip 1998 Mediation in the Dutch science system. Research Policy, 27(8), 757-769.
69. Van Raan, A 2004 Measuring ccience. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, eds. H Moed, W Glänzel and U Schmoch, pp. 19-50. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
70. Van Raan, A 2005 Fatal attraction: conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.