Phylogenetic analysis of morphological characters in Ourisia (Plantaginaceae): Taxonomic and evolutionary implications

Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden

Volumn 94, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 554-570

  Meudt, Heidi M ^a,b   Simpson, Beryl B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b MUSEUM OF NEW ZEALAND TE PAPA TONGAREWA   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Character evolution; Infrageneric taxonomy; Morphology; Ourisia; Phylogeny; Plantaginaceae; Scrophulariaceae s.l.

Indexed keywords

MELOSPERMA; OURISIA; PLANTAGINACEAE; SCROPHULARIACEAE;

EID: 35549013245     PISSN: 00266493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3417/0026-6493(2007)94[554:PAOMCI]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Albach, D. C., H. M. Meudt & B. Oxelman. 2005. Piecing together the "new" Plantaginaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 297-315.
2. APG II. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399-436.
3. Arroyo, M. T. K. & A. Peñaloza. 1990. Genetic self-compatibility in a South American species of Ourisia (Scrophulariaceae). New Zealand J. Bot. 28: 467-470.
4. _, J. J. Armesto & R. B. Primack. 1985. Community studies in pollination ecology in the high temperate Andes of central Chile. II. Effect of temperature on visitation rates and pollination possibilities. Pl. Syst. Evol. 149: 187-203.
5. Bremer, B., R. K. Jansen, B. Oxelman, M. Backlund, H. Lantz & K.-J. Kim. 1999. More characters or more taxa for a robust phylogeny-case study from the coffee family (Rubiaceae). Syst. Biol. 48: 413-435.
6. Farris, J. S., M. Kallersjo, A. G. Kluge & C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Syst. Biol. 44: 570-572.
7. Grant, K. A. & V. Grant. 1968. Hummingbirds and Their Flowers. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
8. Hair, J. B. & M. T. K. Arroyo. 1984. Contributions to a chromosome atlas of the New Zealand flora-28. New Zealand J. Bot. 22: 357-359.
9. Hillis, D. M. & J. P. Huelsenbeck. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Heredity 83: 189-195.
10. Huelsenbeck, J. P. & F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755.
11. Johnson, L. A. & D. E. Soltis. 1998. Assessing congruence: Empirical examples from molecular data. Pp. 297-348 in D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis & J. J. Doyle (editors), Molecular Systematics of Plants II: DNA Sequencing. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Norwell, Massachusetts.
12. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, P. F. Stevens & M. J. Donoghue. 2002. Plant systematics - A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
13. Kampny, C. M. 1995. Pollination and flower diversity in Scrophulariaceae. Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 61: 350-366.
14. _ & N. G. Dengler. 1997. Evolution of flower shape in Veroniceae (Scrophulariaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 205: 1-25.
15. Kornet, D. J. & H. Turner. 1999. Coding polymorphism for phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 48: 365-379.
16. Lloyd, D. G. 1985. Progress in understanding the natural history of New Zealand plants. New Zealand J. Bot. 23: 707-722.
17. Maddison, W. P. 1993. Missing data versus missing characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42: 576-581.
18. _ & D. R. Maddison. 2000. MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
19. Meudt, H. M. 2006. A monograph of the genus Ourisia Comm. ex Juss. (Plantaginaceae). Syst. Bot. Monogr. 77: 1-188.
20. _ & B. B. Simpson. 2006. The biogeography of the austral, subalpine genus Ourisia (Plantaginaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic evidence: South American origin and dispersal to New Zealand and Tasmania. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 87: 479-513.
21. Perez, F., M. T. K. Arroyo, R. Medel & M. A. Hershkovitz. 2006. Ancestral reconstruction of flower morphology and pollination systems in Schizanthus (Solanaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 93: 1029-1038.
22. Poeppig, E. F. & S. F. L. Endlicher. 1835. Nova Genera ac Species Plantarum. Friderici Hofmeister, Leipzig.
23. Posada, D. & K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
24. Rossow, R. A. 1985. Melospermeae, nueva tribu de Scrophulariaceae. Parodiana 3: 365-396.
25. _. 1993. Estudio Anatómico, Palinológico y Sistemático de las Especies del Género Ourisia (Scrophulariaceae, Rhinanthoideae, Ourisieae) de América del Sur. Ph.D. thesis, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires.
26. Schlessman, M. A. 1986. Floral protogyny, self-compatibility and the pollination of Ourisia macrocarpa (Scrophulariaceae). New Zealand J. Bot. 24: 651-656.
27. Sérsic, A. N. & A. A. Cocucci. 1999. An unusual kind of nectary in the oil flowers of Monttea: Its structure and function. Flora 194: 393-404.
28. Sheader, M. & A.-L. Sheader. 2004. Plant Awards 2003-2004. Bull. Alp. Gard. Soc. Gr. Brit. 72: 438-441, 450.
29. Strong, E. E. & D. Lipscomb. 1999. Character coding and inapplicable data. Cladistics 15(4): 363-371.
30. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
31. Vos, R. A. 2003. Accelerated likelihood surface exploration: The likelihood ratchet. Syst. Biol. 52: 368-373.
32. Webb, C. J. & M. J. A. Simpson. 2001. Seeds of New Zealand Gymnosperms and Dicotyledons. The Caxton Press, Christchurch.
33. Wilkinson, M. 1995. A comparison of two methods of character construction. Cladistics 11: 297-308.
34. Wilson, P., M. C. Castellanos, A. Wolfe & J. D. Thomson. 2006. Shifts between bee- and bird-pollination among penstemons. Pp. 47-68 in N. M. Waser & J. Ollerton (editors), Specialization and Generalization in Pollination Systems. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago.