Lawyers of the right: Networks and organization

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 883-917

  Paik, Anthony ^a   Southworth, Ann ^b   Heinz, John P ^c  

^a University of Iowa   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN BAR FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35549012876     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: 17474469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2007.00082.x     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Abramson, Jill. 1986. Right Place at the Right Time. American Lawyer June : 99 100.
2. Alexander, C. Norman, Jr. 1963. A Method for Processing Sociometric Data. Sociometry 26 : 268 69.
3. Baker, Frank B. Lawrence J. Hubert. 1981. The Analysis of Social Interaction Data: A Nonparametric Technique. Sociological Methods and Research 9 : 339 61.
4. Becker, Howard S. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. Glencoe, IL : Free Press.
5. Bonacich, Phillip. 1987. Power and Centrality: A Family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology 92 : 1170 82.
6. Broder, David S. 2005. From Miers, Telling Words. Washington Post, October 6, A27.
7. Brown, Steven P. 2002. Trumping Religion: The New Christian Right, the Free Speech Clause, and the Courts. Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press.
8. Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
9. Caldeira, Gregory A. Samuel C. Patterson. 1987. Political Friendship in the Legislature. The Journal of Politics 49 : 953 75.
10. Chaddock, Gail Russell. 2005. A Judicial Think Tank - or a Plot? Christian Science Monitor, August 4, A1.
11. Congressional Universe. 2000. Bethesda, MD : LexisNexis (division of Reed Elsevier).
12. DeParle, Jason. 2005. Debating the Subtle Sway of the Federalist Society. New York Times, August 1, A12.
13. Domhoff, G. William. 1983. Who Rules America Now? A View from the '80s. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
14. Dye, Thomas R. 1986. Who's Running America: The Conservative Years. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice-Hall.
15. Eades, Peter. 1984. A Heuristic for Graph Drawing. Congressus Numerantium 42 : 149 60.
16. Epstein, Lee. 1985. Conservatives in Court. Knoxville : University of Tennessee Press.
17. Federalist Society. 2004. Our purpose. http://www.fed-soc.org/ourpurpose. htm (accessed May 24, 2004).
18. Fernandez, Roberto M. Roger V. Gould. 1994. A Dilemma of State Power: Brokerage and Influence in the National Health Policy Domain. American Journal of Sociology 99 : 1455 91.
19. Fernandez, Roberto M. Doug McAdam. 1988. Social Networks and Social Movements: Multiorganizational Fields and Recruitment to Mississippi Freedom Summer. Sociological Forum 3 : 357 82.
20. Fletcher, Michael A. 2005. What the Federalist Society Stands For: Group Is Haven for Conservative Thought. Washington Post, July 29, A21.
21. Frank, Kenneth A. Jeffrey Y. Yasumoto. 1998. Linking Action to Social Structure within a System: Social Capital within and between Subgroups. American Journal of Sociology 104 : 642 86.
22. Freeman, Linton. 1979. Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarifications. Social Networks 1 : 215 39.
23. Freeman, Linton. 2005. Graphic Techniques for Exploring Social Network Data. In Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis, ed. Peter J. Carrington, John Scott Stanley Wasserman. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24. Friedkin, Noah E. 1991. Theoretical Foundations for Centrality Measures. American Journal of Sociology 96 : 1478 504.
25. Galaskiewicz, Joseph. 1979. Exchange Networks and Community Politics. Beverly Hills, CA : Sage.
26. Goldthorpe, John H. Keith Hope. 1972. Occupational Grading and Occupation Prestige. In The Analysis of Social Mobility: Methods and Approaches, ed. Keith Hope. London : Oxford University Press.
27. Gould, Roger V. 1989. Power and Social Structure in Community Elites. Social Forces 68 : 531 52.
28. Gould, Roger V. Roberto Fernandez. 1989. Structures of Mediation: A Formal Approach to Brokerage in Transaction Networks. Sociological Methodology 19 : 89 126.
29. Hacker, Hans J. 2005. The Culture of Conservative Christian Litigation. Lanham, MD : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
30. Hatcher, Laura. 2005. Economic Libertarians, Property, and Institutions: Linking Activism, Ideas, and Identities among Property Rights Advocates. In The Worlds Cause Lawyers Make: Structure and Agency in Legal Practice, ed. Austin Sarat Stuart A. Scheingold. Stanford, CA : Stanford University Press.
31. Heinz, John P. Edward O. Laumann. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York : Russell Sage Foundation.
32. Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policymaking. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
33. Heinz, John P., Robert L. Nelson, Rebecca L. Sandefur Edward O. Laumann. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar. Chicago : University of Chicago Press.
34. Heinz, John P., Anthony Paik Ann Southworth. 2003. Lawyers for Conservative Causes: Clients, Ideology, and Social Distance. Law and Society Review 37 : 5 50.
35. Hoover, Dennis R. Kevin R. den Dulk. 2004. Christian Conservatives Go to Court: Religion and Legal Mobilization in the United States and Canada. International Political Science Review 25 : 9 34.
36. Houck, Oliver. 1984. With Charity for All. Yale Law Journal 93 : 1415 563.
37. Kadushin, Charles. 1995. Friendship Among the French Financial Elite. American Sociological Review 60 : 202 21.
38. Kamada, Tomihisa Satoru Kawai. 1991. A General Framework for Visualizing Abstract Objects and Relations. ACM Transaction on Graphics 10 : 1 29.
39. Kirkpatrick, David D. 2005a. Despite Recent Gains, Conservative Group Is Wary on Direction of Court. New York Times, November 11, A20.
40. Kirkpatrick, David D. 2005b. Ruling on Property Seizures Rallies Christian Groups. New York Times, July 11, A13.
41. Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York : Cambridge University Press.
42. Knoke, David. 1993. Networks as Political Glue: Explaining Public Policy Making. In Sociology and the Public Agenda, ed. William J. Wilson. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
43. Knoke, David. 1994. Networks of Elite Structure and Decision Making. In Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, ed. Stanley Wasserman Joseph Galaskiewicz. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
44. Krackhardt, David. 1987. QAP Partialling as a Test of Spuriousness. Social Networks 9 : 171 86.
45. Krackhardt, David. 1988. Predicting with Networks: Nonparametric Multiple Regression Analysis of Dyadic Data. Social Networks 10 : 359 81.
46. Krishnan, Jayanth K. Kevin R. den Dulk. 2002. So Help Me God: A Comparative Study of Religious Interest Group Litigation. Georgia Journal of International Comparative Law 30 : 233 79.
47. Lasswell, Harold D. 1936. Politics: Who Gets What, When, and How. New York : McGraw-Hill.
48. Laumann, Edward O., John P. Heinz, Robert L. Nelson Robert H. Salisbury. 1985. Washington Lawyers and Others: The Structure of Washington Representation. Stanford Law Review 37 : 465 502.
49. Laumann, Edward O. David Knoke. 1987. The Organizational State: A Perspective on National Energy and Health Domains. Madison : University of Wisconsin Press.
50. Laumann, Edward O., David Knoke Yong-Hak Kim. 1985. An Organizational Approach to State Policy Formation: A Comparative Study of Energy and Health Domains. American Sociological Review 50 : 1 19.
51. Laumann, Edward O. Peter V. Marsden. 1979. The Analysis of Oppositional Structures in Political Elites: Identifying Collective Actors. American Sociological Review 44 : 713 32.
52. Laumann, Edward O., Peter V. Marsden Joseph Galaskiewicz. 1977. Community Influence Structures: Replication and Extension of a Network Approach. American Journal of Sociology 31 : 169 78.
53. Laumann, Edward O., Peter V. Marsden David Prensky. 1989. The Boundary Specification Problem in Network Analysis. In Research Methods in Social Network Analysis, ed. Linton C. Freeman Douglas R. White. Fairfax, VA : George Mason University Press.
54. Laumann, Edward O. Franz U. Pappi. 1976. Networks of Collective Action: A Perspective on Community Influence Systems. New York : Academic Press.
55. Liasson, Mara. 2005. Miers Nomination Divides Conservatives. Morning Edition, October 21.
56. Marwell, Gerald Pamela Oliver. 1993. Critical Mass in Collective Action: A Micro-Social Theory. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
57. McGuire, Kevin T. 1993. Lawyers and the U.S. Supreme Court: The Washington Community and Legal Elites. American Journal of Political Science 37 : 365 90.
58. Mills, C. Wright. 1956. The Power Elite. New York : Oxford University Press.
59. Moody, James, Daniel McFarland Skye Bender-deMoll. 2005. Dynamic Network Visualization. American Journal of Sociology 110 : 1206 41.
60. Nielsen, Laura Beth Catherine R. Albiston. 2006. The Organization of Public Interest Practice. North Carolina Law Review 84 : 1591 621.
61. O'Connor, Karen Lee Epstein. 1983. The Rise of Conservative Interest Group Litigation. Journal of Politics 45 : 479 89.
62. O'Connor, Karen Lee Epstein. 1989. Public Interest Law Groups: Institutional Profiles. Westport, CT : Greenwood Press.
63. Olson, Mancur. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
64. Padgett, John F. Christopher K. Ansell. 1993. Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400-1434. American Journal of Sociology 81 : 730 80.
65. Ponnuru, Remesh. 2005. Why Conservatives Are Divided. New York Times, October 17, A19.
66. RightGuide's Conservative Directory. 2000. http://www.rightguide.com/ links-alpha.htm (accessed June 21, 2000).
67. Salisbury, Robert H. 1969. An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science 13 : 1 32.
68. Salisbury, Robert H. 1984. Interest Representation: The Dominance of Institutions. American Political Science Review 78 : 64 76.
69. Salisbury, Robert, John P. Heinz, Edward O. Laumann Robert L. Nelson. 1987. Who Works with Whom? Interest Group Alliances and Opposition. American Political Science Review 81 : 1217 34.
70. Savage, David G. 2005. The Nation; Engaged in a Very Civil War; The Federalist Society has Reshaped the Legal System Without Ever Going to Court. New York Times, November 11, A1.
71. Shapiro, Carl Hal R. Varian. 1998. Information Rules. Cambridge, MA : Harvard Business School Press.
72. Shils, Edward. 1968. Deference. In Social Stratification, ed. John A. Jackson, 104 32. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
73. Smith, James A. 1991. The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy Elite. New York : Free Press.
74. Southworth, Ann. 2005. Conservative Lawyers and the Contest Over the Meaning of "Public Interest Law." UCLA Law Review 52 : 1223 78.
75. Useem, Michael. 1983. The Inner Circle: Large Corporations and Business Politics in the U.S. and the U.K. New York : Oxford University Press.
76. Wagner, Bridgett G., John E. Hilboldt Eric T. Korsvall. 2000. Policy Experts 2000: A Guide to Public Policy Experts and Organizations. Washington, DC : Heritage Foundation.
77. Washington Representatives. 2000. Washington, DC : Columbia Books.
78. Wasserman, Stanley Katherine Faust. 1994. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
79. White, Harrison C., Scott A. Boorman Ronald L. Breiger. 1976. Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions. American Journal of Sociology 81 : 730 79.