The end of the European model?;La fin du modèle Européen?

Revue d'Economie Politique

Volumn 117, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 551-575

  Amable, Bruno ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

Author keywords

Diversity of capitalism; Ideology; Political economy; Reforms

Indexed keywords

EID: 35549008469     PISSN: 03732630     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/redp.174.0551     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. ALBERT M. [1991], Capitalisme contre capitalisme, Paris, Le Seuil.
2. AMABLE B. [2004], L'Europe est-elle condamnée à la réforme conservatrice ? Prisme No. 3 Centre Cournot pour la Recherche en Economie.
3. AMABLE B. [2005], Les cinq capitalismes. Diversité des systèmes économiques et sociaux dans la mondialisation. Seuil, Paris.
4. AMABLE B. [2006a], Innovation et compétitivité en Europe. Reflets et perspectives de la vie économique no 1/2006, 15-30.
5. AMABLE B. [2006b], Three Decades of Party Politics. Draft CEPREMAP.
6. AMABLE B. [2006c], The Great Lisbon Agenda Swindle. Draft CEPREMAP.
7. AMABLE B. [2007], The Differentiation of Social Expectations in Europe. Draft CEPREMAP.
8. AMABLE B., L. DEMMOU and D. GATTI [2007], Institutions, chômage et inactivité dans les pays de l'OCDE. Revue Economique numéro special Congrès AFSE. A paraître.
9. AMABLE B., D. GATTI et J. SCHUMACHER [2006], Welfare-State Retrenchment : The Partisan Effect Revisited. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22 : 426-444.
10. AMABLE B. et S. PALOMBARINI [2005], L'économie politique n'est pas une science morale. Raisons d'Agir, Paris.
11. BACCARO L. and D. REI [2005], Institutional determinants of unemployment in OECD countries : A time series cross-section analysis (1960-98). DP/160/2005 Decent Work Research, International Institute for Labour Studies Geneva.
12. BAKER, D., A. GLYN, D. HOWELL and J. SCHMITT [2005], Labor Market Institutions and unemployment : A Critical Assessment of the Cross-Country Evidence. In D. Howell (Ed.) Fighting Unemployment. The Limits of Free Market Orthodoxy. Oxford University Press.
13. BLAIR T. and G. SCHRÖDER [1999], Europe, the Third Way. Traduction française dans : Notes de la Fondation Jean Jaurès No 13. Paris.
14. BOYER R. [2006], La flexisécurité danoise : quels enseignements pour la France ? Paris : Ed. ENS rue d'Ulm.
15. BUDGE et al. (sous la direction) [2001], Mapping Policy Preferences, Oxford : Oxford University Press.
16. CUSACK T. R. et L. ENGELHARDT [2002], The PGL File Collection. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
17. GIDDENS A. [1994], Beyond Left and Right. Cambridge : Polity Press.
18. GUILLAUD E. [2006], Preferences for Redistribution : A European Comparative Analysis. Draft PSE.
19. GUILLAUD E. and S. PALOMBARINI [2006], Evolution des attentes sociales en France et comportement électoral : une crise aux racines anciennes. Draft PSE.
20. HOWELL D., D. BAKER, A. GLYN et J. SCHMIDT [2006], Are Protective Labor Market Institutions Really at the Root of Unemployment ? A Critical Perspective on the Statistical Evidence. Draft New School for Social Research.
21. INGLEHART R. [1977], The Silent Revolution. Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press.
22. IVERSEN T. et D. SOSKICE [2001], An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences. American Political Science Review, 95(4), 875-893.
23. KITSCHELT H. et P. REHM [2005], Work, Family, and Politics. Foundations of Electoral Partisan Alignments in Postindustrial Democracies. Papier présenté au congrès annuel de l'American Political Science Association, Washington.
24. LIJ PHART A. [ 1999], Patterns of Democracy. Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries, Yale University Press, New Haven.
25. LIPSET S.M. et S. ROKKAN [1967], Party systems and voter alignments: crossnational perspectives. New York : Free Press.
26. MELTZER A. et S. RICHARDS [1981], A Rational Theory of the Size of Government. Journal of Political Economy 89(5), 914-927.
27. MOENE K. O. et M. WALLERSTEIN [2001], Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution, American Political Science Review, 95(4), 859-74.
28. OCDE [1996], The Knowledge-Based Economy, Paris, OCDE.
29. OCDE [2000], A New Economy ? The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth, Paris, OCDE OCDE [2005] Réformes Economiques : Objectif Croissance 2005. OCDE, Paris.
30. PIERSON P. [2001], Coping with Permanent Austerity: Welfare State Restructuring in Affluent Democracies, in P. Pierson (ed.) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
31. PLANT R. [1998], The Third Way. Working Paper FES 5/1998, London.
32. RODRIGUES M.J. [2003], The New Knowledge Economy in Europe : A Strategy for International Competitiveness and Social Cohesion, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
33. RODRIGUES M.J. [2004], European Policies For A Knowledge Economy. Cheltenham : Edward Elgar.
34. SAPIR, A (sous la direction de) [2004], An Agenda for Growing Europe. The Sapir Report. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
35. SOETE L [2005], Activating Knowledge. Discussion paper prepared for the UK Presidency.
36. THOMASSEN J. (sous la direction de) [2005], The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. VOLKENS A. [2001], Quantifying the Election Programmes : Coding Procedures and Controls, in: I. Budge et. al. (sous la direction) Mapping Policy Preferences, Oxford : Oxford University Press.