The Dual role of peer-review systems in developing countries

Archives of Iranian Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 519-521

  Saidi, Farrokh ^a  

^a TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; CHINA; DEVELOPED COUNTRY; DEVELOPING COUNTRY; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; POLITICS; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; QUALITY CONTROL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 35548995369     PISSN: 10292977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Melvin S. China's college revolution. The Wilson Quarterly. Autumn 2006: 37-44.
2. Wooldridge A. The battle for brainpower. The Economist. October 9, 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.economist.com/surveys/ displaystory.cfm?story_id=7961894.
3. Levin R. World of knowledge. Newsweek. August 21, 2006. Available from: URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032542/site/newsweek.
4. David, P. The knowledge factory: a survey of universities. The Economist. 1997. 345: 1-22.
5. Gupta V. Research, publications, and the developing world. Lancet. 2007; 369: 273.
6. Smith R. Research misconduct: the poisoning of the well. J Roy Soc Med. 2006; 99: 232-237.
7. Hall GM, Editor. How to Write a Paper. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2003: 154.