The Scandinavian model: Still an example for Europe?

Internationale Politik und Gesellschaft

Volumn , Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Becker, Uwe ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548995006     PISSN: 09452419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aarvaag Stokke, T. and C. Thörnqvist 2001, »Strikes and Collective Bargaining in the Nordic Countries,« European Journal of Industrial Relations 7,3, pp. 245-267.
2. Abrahamson, P. 2006, »Welfare Reform. Renewal or Deviation?,« in John A. Camp-bell, John A. Hall and Ove K. Pedersen (eds), National Identity and a Varity of Capitalism: The Case of Denmark, Montreal: McGill University Press, pp. 356-374.
3. Andersen, P. 1997, »Wonderful Denmark?,« CPB Report 97/2, pp. 46-47.
4. Becker, U. (ed.) 2003, State-of-the-Art Report, Smallcons project, Amsterdam; www. smallcons.nl
5. Becker, U. 2005, »An Example of Competitive Corporatism? The Dutch Political Economy 1983-2003 in Critical Examination,« Journal of European Public Policy 12 (6), pp. 1078-1102.
6. Becker, U. and H. Schwartz 2005, »Conclusion: The Importance of Lucky Circumstances, and Still the Liberal - Social Democratic Divide,« in U. Becker and H. Schwartz (eds), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 231-247.
7. Blyth, M. 2002, Great Transformations. Economic Ideas and Institutional Change in the Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Compston, H. and P.K. Madsen 2001, »Conceptual innovation and public policy: unemployment and paid leave schemes in Denmark,« Journal of European Social Policy 11, 2: 117-132.
9. Elvander, N. 2002, »The New Swedish Regime for Collective Bargaining and Conflict Resolution: A Comparative Perspective,« European Journal of Industrial Relations 8, 2: pp. 197-216.
10. Esping-Anderson, G. 1985, Politics against Markets: The Social Democratic Road to Power, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
11. Eda 2003, Nokia in the Finnish Economy, http://brie-eda.org_pdf/ wef_rouvinen_ylaanttila_wireless_finland.pdf.
12. European Commission 2003, The Social Situation in the European Union, Brussels.
13. European Commission 2004, European Competitiveness Report 2004, Luxemburg: Eur-Op.
14. European Commission 2006, Spring Economic Forecasts 2006, Brussels, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs.
15. Förster, M. and M. Mira d'Ercole 2005, »Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries in the Second Half of the 1990s,« OECD Social Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 22, OECD Publishing.
16. Green-Pedersen, C. and A. Lindbom 2005, »Employment and Unemployment in Denmark and Sweden: Success or Failure for the Universal Welfare Model?«, in U. Becker and H. Schwartz (eds), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 65-85.
17. Hesselius, P. 2006, Work Absence and Social Security in Sweden, Department of Economics, Uppsala University; www.sns.se/document/nber2_ph.pdf.
18. ITC 2004, International Trade Statistics. Country Market Analysis Profiles, New York: International Trade Center (Unctad/wro; www.intracen.org/menus/countries. htm).
19. ITT 2004, The European Innovation Scoreboard 2004, Innovation and Technology Transfer (European Commission), Brussels.
20. Kiander, J. 2005, »The Evolution of the Finnish Model in the 1990s: From Depression to High-Tech Boom,« in U. Becker and H. Schwartz (eds), Employment Miracles. A Critical Comparison of the Dutch, Scandinavian, Swiss, Australian and Irish Cases versus Germany and the US, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 87-106.
21. Korpi, W. and J. Palme 2003, »New Politics and Class Politics in the Context of Austerity and Globalisation: Welfare State Regress in 18 Countries, 1975-95,« American Political Science Review 97: 425-446.
22. Kettunen, P. 2004, »The Nordic Model and Consensual Competitiveness in Finland,« in A. Castén et al. Between Sociology and History. Essays on Microhistory, Collective Action, and Nation-Building, Helsinki: SKS.
23. Lindvall, J. 2004, The Politics of Purpose: Swedish Macroeamomic Policy after the Golden Age, Göteborg: Göteborg Studies in Politics 84.
24. Madsen, P.K. 1999, Denmark: Flexibility, Security and Labor Market Success, ILO Employment & Training Papers 53, Geneva; www.ilo.org/public/english/employment/strat/publ/etp5 3 .html
25. Milner, H. 2001, Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work, Hanover N.H: University Press of New England.
26. OECD 1999, 2004, 2006a, Employment Outlook 1909 (2004, 2006), Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
27. OECD 2006b, Statistics Portal. Productivity Database, September 2006, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
28. Plougmann, P. and P.K. Madsen 2002, »Flexibility, Employment Development and Active Labour Market Policy in Denmark and Sweden in the 1990s,« CEPA. Working Paper 2002-04. New York: New School University, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
29. Rae, D. 2005a, How to Reduce Sickness Absences in Sweden: Lessons from International Experience, OECD, Economics Department, Working Paper 442, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
30. Rae, D. 2005b, Getting Better Value for Money from Sweden's Health Care System, OECD, Economics Department, Working Paper 443, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
31. WEF 2006, World Competitiveness Report 2006-2007, Basel: World Economic Forum (www.weforum.org).
32. WKO 2003, Statistisches Jahrbuch 2003, Wien: Wirtschaftskammern Österreichs.
33. WTO 2003, International Trade Statistics 2003, Geneva: World Trade Organization.