Bayesian network approach for offshore risk analysis through linguistic variables

China Ocean Engineering

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 371-388

  Ren, J ^a   Wang, J ^a   Jenkinson, I ^a   Xu, D L ^b   Yang, J B ^b  

^a LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bayesian network; F weighted valuation function; Fuzzy number; Linguistic probability; Offshore engineering system; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; COSTS; FUZZY SETS; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OCEAN ENGINEERING; PROBABILITY; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

FUZZY NUMBER; LINGUISTIC PROBABILITY; OFFSHORE ENGINEERING SYSTEM; OFFSHORE RISK ANALYSIS;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 35548994028     PISSN: 08905487     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Detynieckim, M., and Yager, R., 2000. Ranking fuzzy numbers using alpha-weighted valuations, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 8(5): 573-592.
2. Hayes, K. R., 1998. Bayesian statistical inference in ecological risk assessment, Crimp Technical Report (No. 17), Centre for Research on Introduced Marine Pests, CSIRO, Hobart, Australia.
3. Heckerman, D., 1997. Bayesian networks for data mining, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1): 79-119.
4. Heckeman, D. and Breese, J., 1996. Causal independence for probability assessment and inference using Bayesian networks, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 26(6): 826-831.
5. HSE, 1996. The offshore installations and wells (design and construction, etc.) regulations 1996, Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books, ISBN: 011054451X, No. 913, London.
6. Jenson, F. V., 1993. Introduction to Bayesian networks: HUGIN, Aalborg University Press, Aalborg, Denmark.
7. Kadie, C. M., Hovel, D. and Horvitz, E., 2001. MSBNx: a component-centric toolkit for modelling and inference with Bayesian networks, MSR-TR-2001-67, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA.
8. Kang, C. W. and Golay, M. W., 1999. A Bayesian belief network-based advisory system for operational availability focused diagnosis of complex nuclear power systems, Expert Systems with Applications, 17 (1): 21-32.
9. Karwowski, W. and Mital, A., 1986. Potential applications of fuzzy sets in industrial safety engineering, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 19(2): 105-120.
10. Lauritzen, S. L. and Spiegelhalter, D. J., 1988. Local computations with probabilities on graphical structures and their application to expert systems, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 50(2): 157-224.
11. Mitchell, K. and Bright, C. K., 1995. Minimizing the potential for human error in ship operation, MAS 95, Management and Operation of Ships, Practical Techniques for Today and Tomorrow.
12. Myllymaki, P., 2005. Advantages of Bayesian networks in data mining and knowledge discovery, http://www.bayesit.com/docs/advantages.html, (access date: 11/06/2006).
13. Netica, 2002. Netica-J reference manual-version 2.21, Java Version of Netica API, Norsys Software Corporation.
14. Pearl, J., 1988. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems Networks of Plausible Inference, Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, USA.
15. Ren, J., Jenkinson, I., Sii, H. S., Xu, D. L., Wang, J. and Yang, J. B., 2005a. An offshore safety assessment framework using fuzzy reasoning and evidential synthesis approaches, Journal of Marine Engineering and Technology (Part A), (A6): 3-16.
16. Ren, J., Wang, J. and jenkinson, I., 2005b. Fuzzy Bayesian modelling in maritime risk analysis, GERI Annual Research Symposium, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
17. Ross, T. J., 1995. Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, McGraw-Hill, Inc.
18. Sii, H. S., Ruxton, T. and Wang, J., 2002. A synthesis using fuzzy set theory and Dempster-Shafer based approach to compromise decision making with multiple attribute applied to risk control options selection, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 216(1): 15-29.
19. UKDE, 1990. The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha disaster (Cullen Report), ISBN 010113102, UK Department of Energy, London, UK.
20. UKOOA, 1999. Industry guidelines on a framework for risk related decision making, UK Offshore Operators Association, Aberdeen, UK.
21. Wang, J., 2005. Maritime risk assessment and its current states, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 21 (7): 1-17.
22. Wang, J. and Kieran, O., 2000. Offshore safety assessment and safety based decision making - The current status and future aspects, Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering-Transactions of the ASME, 122(2): 93-99.
23. Wang, J. and Ruxton, T., 1997. Design for safety, Journal of American Society of Safety Engineers, Jan., 23-29.
24. Wang, J., Yang, J. B. and Sen, P., 1995. Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy set modelling and evidential reasoning, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 47(2): 103-118.
25. Yager, R. R., 1981. A procedure for ordering fuzzy subsets of the unit interval, Information Sciences, 24(2): 143-161.
26. Yager, R. R., 1999. On ranking fuzzy numbers using valuations, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 14(6): 1249-1268.
27. Yang, J. B. and Xu, D. L., 2002. On the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertainty, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans, 32 (3): 289-304.
28. Zhang, G., Bai, C., Lu, J. and Zhang, C., 2004. Bayesian network based cost benefit factor inference in e-services, Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Technology for Application (ICITA), Harbin, P. R. China, January 7-10, 464-469.