Evaluation of a mobile information system in context

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 39-65

  Göker, Ayşe ^a   Myrhaug, Hans ^b  

^a Centre for Interactive Systems Research   (United Kingdom)

^b Ambiesense Limited   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Evaluation in context; Mobile information retrieval; User centred evaluation methodology

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS; RADIO; USER INTERFACES;

MOBILE INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; USER CENTRED EVALUATION METHODOLOGY;

MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 35548979924     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Borlund P. The concept of relevance in IR. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 10 (2003) 913-925
2. Borlund P., and Ingwersen P. The development of a method for the evaluation of interactive information retrieval systems. Journal of Documentation 53 3 (1997) 223-250
3. Cheverst, K., Davies, N., Mitchell, K., Friday, A., & Efstratiou, C. (2000). Developing a context-aware electronic tourist guide: some issues and experiences. In Proceedings of CHI 2000 (pp. 17-24), Netherlands, April.
4. Cool C., and Spink A. Special issue on context in information retrieval. Information Processing and Management 38 5 (2002)
5. Dey A., Kortuem G., Morse D., and Schmidt A. Special issue on situated interaction and context-aware computing. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 5 1 (2001)
6. Dix A., Finlay J., Abowd G., and Beale R. Human-computer interaction. 3rd ed. (2004), Prentice-Hall. 0-13-239864-8
7. Goguen J.A., and Linde C. Techniques for requirements elicitation, requirements engineering. IEEE Computer (1993) 152-164
8. Göker, A. (1994). An Investigation into the Application of Machine Learning in Information Retrieval. PhD Thesis. Department of Information Science. London, UK: City University.
9. Göker A. Context learning in Okapi. Journal of Documentation 53 (1997) 80-83
10. Göker, A., Watt, S., Myrhaug, H. I., Whitehead, N., Yakici, M., Bierig, R., et al. (2004). An ambient, personalised, and context-sensitive information system for mobile users ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Union symposium on Ambient intelligence, Eindhoven (pp. 19-24), Vol. 84. ISBN:1-58113-992-6.
11. Göker, A., Yakici, M., Bierig, R., & Myrhaug, H. I. (2004). A context-sensitive information system for mobile users (demo). Workshop on Information Retrieval in Context, SIGIR 2004, Sheffield, UK. http://ir.dcs.gla.ac.uk/context/.
12. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report 8 4 (2003) 597-607
13. He D., Göker A., and Harper D. Combining evidence for automatic Web session identification. Information Processing and Management 38 (2002) 727-742
14. Iqbal, R., Sturm, J., Kulyk, O., Wang, J., & Terken, J. (2005). User-centred design and evaluation of ubiquitous services. In Proceedings of ACM SIGDOC (pp. 138-145), Coventry, UK.
15. Kekalainen J., and Jarvelin K. Using graded relevance assessments in IR. Journal of the ASIST 53 13 (2002) 1120-1129
16. Kjeldskov J., and Graham C. A review of mobile HCI research methods. Proc. MobileHCI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 2795 (2003), Springer 317-335
17. Lincoln Y.S., and Guba E.G. Naturalistic inquiry (1985), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California
18. Mizzaro S. Relevance: the whole history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48 9 (1997) 810-832
19. Morse J.M., Barrett M., Mayan M., Olson K., and Spiers J. Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 1 2 (2002) Article 2
20. Myrhaug, H. I. (2001). Towards Life-long Context Spaces. In Workshop on User Modelling for Context-aware Applications. User Modelling Conference UM2001, Sonthofen, June.
21. Myrhaug, H. I., & Göker, A. (2003). AmbieSense - interactive information channels in the surroundings of the mobile user. In 10th International Conference on Human-computer Interaction (HCI International 2003), Crete, Greece.
22. Myrhaug H., Whitehead N., Göker A., Faegri T.E., and Lech T.C. AmbieSense - A system and reference architecture for personalised context-sensitive information services for mobile users. 2nd European Symposium on Ambient Intelligence EUSAI 2004 (2004), Springer-Verlag, Eindhoven, Netherlands
23. Nielsen J. Guerilla HCI: Using discount usability engineering to penetrate the intimidation barrier. In: Bias R.G., and Mayhew D.J. (Eds). Cost-justifying usability (1994), Academic Press, Boston 242-272
24. Reid J. A task-oriented non-interactive evaluation methodology for information retrieval systems. Journal of Information Retrieval 2 1 (2000) 115-129
25. Saracevic T. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 26 (1976) 321-343
26. Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval. ACM-SIGIR Seattle 1995 (pp. 138-146), Seattle, US.
27. Saracevic T., and Kantor P. A study of information seeking and retrieving. I. Users, questions, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39 (1988) 177-196
28. Saracevic T., and Kantor P. A study of information seeking and retrieving. II. Users, questions, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 39 (1988) 197-216
29. Scholtz J. Metrics for evaluating human information interaction systems. Interacting with Computers 18 (2006) 507-527
30. Scriven M. The methodology of evaluation. In: Tyler R.W., Gagné R.M., and Scriven M. (Eds). Perspectives of curriculum evaluation (1967), Rand McNally, Chicago, IL 39-83
31. Scriven M. Evaluation thesaurus. 4th ed. (1991), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CA
32. Vakkari P. A Theory of the Task-based Information Retrieval Process. Journal of Documentation 57 1 (2001) 44-60