Nothing to hide, nothing to fear?: Assessing technologies for diagnosis of security risks

International Criminal Justice Review

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 193-206

  Saetnan, Ann Rudinow ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

Author keywords

False positive; Forensic technology assessment; Predictive value

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548974723     PISSN: 10575677     EISSN: 15563855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1057567707306651     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashmore, M., Mulkay, M.J., & Pinch, T.J. (1989). Health and efficiency: A sociology of health economics. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
2. Beck, Ulrich. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
3. Blume, S.S. (1991). Insight and industry: On the dynamics of technological change in medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Bowker, G.C., & Leigh Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cartwright, L. (1995). Screening the body: Tracing medicine's visual culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
6. Cole, S.A. (2001). Suspect identities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Dahle, D.Y. (2005, November 16). Ser kriminaliteten i Oslo-gatene. Gjengslagsmål, knivstikking, brutale ran og mishandling med planker. Politiets egne bilder viser hva som foregår i Oslo-gatene [They see the crime in Oslo's streets. Gang fights, knifings, brutal armed robberies and beating with planks. The police's own pictures show what's happening in Oslo's streets]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/oslo/article1150858.ece
8. Denmark Prime Minister's Office. (2005). Det danske samfunds indsats og beredskab mod terror [Danish society's efforts and preparedness against terror]. Retrieved from http://www.stm.dk/publikationer/terror/index.htm
9. Facial Recognition Vendor Test. (2002). Facial Recognition Vendor Test 2002. Retrieved from http://www.frvt.org/FRVT2002/default.htm
10. Fine, A. (2006). Health care technology assessment handbook. Boston: Jones and Bartlett.
11. Giddens A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
12. Inahta. (2001). A checklist for health technology assessment reports. Retrieved from http://www.dimdi.de/static/de/hta/methoden/sammlung/ inahtachecklist.pdf
13. Introna, L.D., & Wood, D. (2004). Picturing algorithmic surveillance: The politics of facial recognition systems. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3), 177-198. Available from Surveillance & Society Web site, http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/cctv.htm.
14. Koehler, J.J. (2001). The psychology of numbers in the courtroom: How to make DNA match statistics seem impressive or insufficient. Southern California Law Review, 74, 1275-1306.
15. Kristensen, F.B., Hørder, M., & Poulsen, P. (2001). Metodehåndbog for medicinsk teknologivurdering [Methods handbook for medical technology assessment]. Copenhagen, Denmark: Statens Institut for Medicinsk Teknologivurdering.
16. Norwegian Rail. (2005). NSB ønsker trygghetskameraer [NSB wants security cameras]. Retrieved from http://www.nsb.no/internet/no/Nyheter/ article.jhtml?articleID=29884&language=no
17. Skolbekken, J.-A. (1995). The risk epidemic in medical journals. Social Scientific Medicine, 40, 291-305.
18. Tagg, J. (1993). The burden of representation. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
19. Thacker, S.B. (1985). Quality of controlled clinical trials. The case of imaging ultrasound in obstetrics: A review. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 92, 437-444.