Increasing response to postal questionaires

International Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 966-967

  Edwards, P ^a   Roberts, I ^a   Clarke, M ^a   DiGuiseppi, C ^a   Pratap, S ^a   Wentz, R ^a   Kwan, I ^a   Cooper, R ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA EXTRACTION; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDLINE; METHODOLOGY; NONRESPONSE BIAS; NOTE; POSTAL MAIL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 35548966022     PISSN: 03005771     EISSN: 14643685     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym181     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Hartge P; Cahill J. Field Mehods in epidemiology. In: Rothman KJ, and Greenland S. (eds). Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edn., Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998.
2. Armstrong BK, White E, Saracci R. Principles of Exposure Measurement in Epidemiology. Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Vol. 21. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995.
3. Edwards P, Robert I, Sandercock P, Frost C. Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: Does questionnaire length matter? Contr Clin Trials 2004;25:31-52.
4. Edwards P, Cooper R, Roberts I, Frost C. Meta-analysis of randomised trials of monetary incentives and response to mailed questionnaires. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:987-99.
5. Scott P, Edwards P. Personally addressed hand-signed letters increase questionnaire response: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMC Health Services Res 2006;6:111.