Considerations for determining optimal mouse caging density

Lab Animal

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 40-49

  Foltz, Charmaine ^a   Carbone, Larry ^b   DeLong, David ^c   Rollin, Bernard E ^d   Van Loo, Pascalle ^e   Whitaker, Julia ^f   Wolff, Axel ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL HOUSING; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; ECONOMICS; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; LABORATORY; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; STANDARD;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; HOUSING, ANIMAL; LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE; MICE; POPULATION CONTROL;

ANIMALIA; MUS;

EID: 35548965233     PISSN: 00937355     EISSN: 15484475     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/laban1107-40     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Baumans, V., Stafleu, F.R. & Bouw, J. Testing housing system for mice-the value of a preference test. Z. Versuchstierkd 29, 9-14 (1987).
2. Davidson, L.P., Chedester, A.L. & Cole, M.N. Effects of cage density on behavior in young adult mice. Comp. Med. 57, 355-359 (2007).
3. Doolittle, D.P., Wilson, S.P. & Gieseking, D. Effect of caging variables on body weight and weight gain in mice. Lab. Anim. Sci. 26, 556-561 (1976).
4. Eveleigh, J.R. Murine cage density: cage ammonia levels during the reproductive performance of an inbred strain and two outbred stocks of monogamous breeding pairs of mice. Lab. Anim. 27, 156-160 (1993).
5. Hackbarth, H., Bohnet, W. & Tsai, P.P. Allometric comparison of recommendations of minimum floor areas for laboratory animals. Lab. Anim. 33, 351-355 (1999).
6. Haemisch, A. Voss, T. Gartner, K. (1994). Effects of environmental enrichment on aggressive behavior, dominance hierarchies, and endocrine states in male DBA/2J mice. Physiol. Behav. 56, 1041-1048.
7. Haemisch, A. & Gartner, K. The cage design affects intermale aggression in small groups of male laboratory mice: strain specific consequences on social organization, and endocrine activations in two inbred strains (DBA/2J and CBA/J). J. Exp. Anim. Sci, 36, 101-116 (1994).
8. Hunt, C. & Hambly, C. Faecal corticosterone concentrations indicate that separately housed male mice are not more stressed than group housed males. Physiol. Behav. 87, 519-526 (2006).
9. Jennings, M. et al. Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Lab. Anim. 32, 233-259 (1998).
10. Kingston, S.G. & Hoffman-Goetz, L. Effect of environmental enrichment and housing density on immune system reactivity to acute exercise stress. Physiol. Behav. 60, 145-150 (1996).
11. Peng, X., Lang, C.M., Drozdowicz, C.K. & Ohlsson-Wilhelm, B.M. Effect of cage population density on plasma corticosterone and peripheral lymphocyte populations of laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 23, 302-306 (1989).
12. Peters, A. & Festing, M. Population density and growth rate in laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 24, 273-279 (1990).
13. Renne, U. The effect of caging type and population density on the body weight development of laboratory mice. Z. Versuchstierkd. 32, 153-156 (1989).
14. Sherwin, C.M. Observations on the prevalence of nest-building in non-breeding TO strain mice and their use of two nesting materials. Lab. Anim. 31, 125-132 (1997).
15. Smith, A.L. & Corrow, D.J. Modifications to husbandry and housing conditions of laboratory rodents for improved well being. ILAR J. 46, 140-147 (2005).
16. Tsai, P.P., Stelzer, H.D., Hedrich, H.J. & Hackbarth, H. Are the effects of different enrichment designs on the physiology and behaviour of DBA/2 mice consistent? Lab Anim. 37, 314-327 (2003).
17. Van de Weerd, H.A., Van Loo, P.L., Van Zutphen, L.F., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Nesting material as environmental enrichment has no adverse effects on behavior and physiology of laboratory mice. Physiol. Behav. 62, 1019-1028 (1997).
18. Van de Weerd, H.A., Van Loo, P.L., Van Zutphen, L.F., Koolhaas, J.M. & Baumans, V. Preferences for nesting material as environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Lab. Anim. 31, 133-143 (1997).
19. Van Loo, P.L., Mol, J.A., Koolhaas, J.M., Van Zutphen, P.F. & Baumans, V. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of group size and cage size. Physiol. Behav. 72, 675-683 (2001).
20. Wurbel, H. & Stauffacher, M. Prevention of stereotypy in laboratory mice: effects on stress physiology and behaviour. Physiol. Behav. 59, 1163-1170 (1996).
21. Councilor Europe. Council Directive 86/609/EEC: OJ L 358, 18.12.1986 as last amended by Directive 2006-10/EC Appendix II.
22. Fullwood, S., Hick, T.A., Brown, J.C., Norman, R.L. & McGlone, J.J. Floor space needs for laboratory mice. ILAR J. 39, 29-36 (1998).
23. McGlone, J.J., Anderson, D.L. & Norman, R.L. Floor space needs for laboratory mice: BALB/cJ males or females in solid-bottom cages with bedding. Cont. Topics 40, 21-25 (2001).
24. Smith, A.L., Mabus, S.L., Muir, C. & Woo, Y. Effects of housing density and cage floor space on C57BL/6J mice. Comp. Med. 54, 656-663 (2004).
25. Smith, A.L., Mabus, S.L., Muir, C. & Woo, Y. Effects of housing density and cage floor space on three strains of young adult inbred mice. Comp. Med. 55, 368-376 (2005).
26. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (ILAR, National Academies Press, Washington, DC,1996).
27. Public Health Service. Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. (US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, 1996) (PL 99-158, Health Research Extension Act, 1985).
28. United States Department of Agriculture. Animal Welfare Act and Animal Welfare Regulations, 9 CFR, Chapter 1 (USDA, Beltsville, MD, 1992).
29. Carbone, L. What Animals Want: Expertise and Advocacy in Laboratory Animal Welfare Policy. (Oxford University Press, New York, 2004).
30. White, W.J., Balk, M.W. & Lang, C.M. Use of cage space by Guineapigs. Lab. Anim. 23, 208-214 (1989).
31. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. Final Rule: Animal Welfare; Standards; 9 CFR Part 3. Federal Register, vol. 55, no. 32. February 15, 1991. P. 6426-6505.
32. Latham, N. & Mason, G. From house mouse to mouse house: the behavioural biology of free-living Mus musculus and its implications for laboratory housing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 86, 261-289 (2004).
33. Whitten, W.K. Occurrence of anoestrus in mice caged in groups. J. Endocrinol. 18, 102-107 (1959).
34. Bouwknecht, J.A., Olivier, B. & Paylor, R.E. The stress-induced hyperthermia paradigm as a physiological animal model for anxiety: a review of pharmacological and genetic studies in the mouse. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 31, 41-59 (2007).
35. resting, M.F. Design and statistical methods in studies using animal models of development. ILAR 47, 5-14 (2006).
36. Wurbel, H. & Garner, J.P. Refinement of rodent research through environmental enrichment and systematic randomization. NC3Rs - National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research at 〈http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/news.asp?id=395〉 (2007).
37. Whitaker, J. et al. The effect of cage size on reproductive performance and behavior in C57BL/6 mice. Lab Anim. (NY) 38, 32-39 (2007).
38. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Animal Welfare Enforcement. Fiscal Year 1997: Report of the Secretary of Agriculture to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Appendix, Table 2. APHIS 41-35-054.
39. Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. Scientific Aspects of the Welfare of Food Animals Report 91 (Ames, Iowa, 1981).
40. Dawkins, M.S. Animal Suffering: The Science of Animal Welfare (Chapman & Hall, London, 1980).
41. Duncan, I.J.H. Animal rights - animal welfare: a scientist's assessment. Poult. Sci. 60, 489-499 (1981).
42. Rollin, B. E. The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain and Science (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).
43. Gartner, K. et al. Stress response of rats to handling and experimental procedures. Lab. Anim. 14, 267-274 (1980).
44. Edwards, E.A. & Dean, L.M. Effects of crowding mice on humoral antibody formation and protection to lethal antigenic challenge. Psychosom. Med. 39, 19-24 (1977).
45. Harvey, P.W. & Chevins, P.F. Crowding during pregnancy delays puberty and alters estrous cycles of female offspring in mice. Experientia 43, 306-308 (1987).
46. Hurst, J.L., Barnard, C.J., Tolladay, U., Nevison, C.M. & West, C.D. Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: Effects of cage stocking density and behavioural predictors of welfare. Anim. Behav. 58, 563-586 (1999).
47. Ishida, H., Mitsui, K., Nukaya, H., Matsumoto, K. & Tsuji, K. Study of active substances involved in skin dysfunction induced by crowding stress. I. Effect of crowding and isolation on some physiological variables, skin function and skin blood perfusion in hairless mice. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 26, 170-181 (2003).