Gauge repeatability and reproducibility for accessing variability during dissolution testing: A technical note

AAPS PharmSciTech

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2007, Pages

  Gao, Zongming ^a   Moore, Terry ^a   Smith, Anjanette P ^a   Doub, William ^a   Westenberger, Benjamin ^a   Buhse, Lucinda ^a  

^a CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissolution test; Gauge R and R; Variability

Indexed keywords

PREDNISONE; DRUG;

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SOLUBILITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROBABILITY; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; TABLET FORMULATION; TIME; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; INSTRUMENTATION; PHARMACEUTICS; SOLUBILITY; STANDARD; TABLET;

CALIBRATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PREDNISONE; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOLUBILITY; TABLETS; TECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 35548956977     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15309932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1208/pt0804092     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Moore TW, Shangraw RF, Habib Y. Dissolution calibrator tablets: a recommendation for new calibrator tablets to replace both current USP calibrator tablets. Pharmacacop Forum. 1996;22:2423-2428.
2. Layloff T. Studies in the development of USP dissolution test method number 2. Pharmacacop Forum. 1983;9:3752-3757.
3. Cox DC, Furman WB, Thornton LK, Moore TW, Jefferson EH. Systematic error associated with apparatus 2 of the USP dissolution test III: limitations of calibrators and the USP suitability test. J Pharm Sci. 1983;72:910-913.
4. Cox DC, Furman WB. Collaborative study of the USP dissolution test for prednisone tablets with apparatus 2. J Pharm Sci. 1984;73:670-676.
5. Hamilton JF, Moore TW, Kerner CM. Reproducibility of dissolution test results. Pharmacacop Forum. 1995;21:1383-1386.
6. Qureshi SA, Shabnam J. Applications of a new device (spindle) for improved characterization of drug release (dissolution) of pharmaceutical products. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2003;19:291-297.
7. Kukura J, Baxter JL, Muzzio FJ. Shear distribution and variability in the USP apparatus 2 under turbulent conditions. Int J Pharm. 2004;279:9-17.
8. Healy AM, McCarthy LG, Gallagher KM, Corrigan OI. Sensitivity of dissolution rate to location in the paddle dissolution apparatus. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2002;54:441-444.
9. McCarthy LG, Kosiol C, Healy AM, Bradley G, Sexton JC, Corrigan OI. Simulating the Hydrodynamic Conditions in the United States Pharmacopeia Paddle Dissolution Apparatus. AAPS PharmSciTech [serial online]. 2003;4:article 22.
10. Bergeret F, Maubert S, Sourd P. Improving and applying destructive gauge capability. Qual Eng. 2002;14:59-66.
11. Early TA, Neagu R. Random and Fixed Factor ANOVA Models: Gauge R&R Studies. GE Research & Development Center, Technical Report. Piscataway, NJ: General Electric Company; 1999.
12. Phillips AR, Jeffries R, Schneider J, Frankoski SP. Using repeatability and reproducibility, studies to evaluate a destructive test method. Qual Eng. 1997;10:283-290.
13. Mast J, Trip A. Gauge R&R studies for destructive measurements. J Qual Technol. 2005;37:40-49.
14. The United States Pharmacopeia. USP 29: General Chapter, Physical Tests and Determinations, <711> Dissolutior. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention; 1995.
15. Gao Z, Moore TW, Smith AP, Doub WH, Westenberger BJ. Studies of variability in dissolution testing with USP apparatus 2. J Pharm Sci. 2007;96:1794-1801.
16. Statistics and Graphics Guide, JMP 5.1. Cary, NC: SAS; 1989.
17. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company; 1995.
18. Subcommittee on Dissolution Calibration. Dissolution calibration: recommendation for reduced chemical testing and enhanced mechanical calibration. Pharmacacop Forum. 2000;26:1149-1166.
19. Gao Z, Moore TW, Doub WH, Westenberger BJ, Buhse LF. Effects of deaeration methods on dissolution testing in aqueous media: a study using a total dissolved gas pressure meter. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95:1606-1613.
20. Mechanical Qualification of Dissolution Apparatus 1 ang 2. US Food and Drag Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Web site. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/offices/OTR/default.htm. Accessed February 8, 2007.
21. Moore TW. Dissolution testing: a fast, efficient procedure for degassing dissolution medium. Dissolution Technol. 1996;3:3-5.