The business case for the global observing system

Oceanography

Volumn 16, Issue SPL.ISS. 4, 2003, Pages 68-76

  Altalo, Mary G ^a   Bogden, Philip ^b   Colgan, Charlie ^c   Lee Dantzler, H ^d   Davidson, Margaret ^e   Mundy, Phil ^f  

^a SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION   (United States)

^b Gulf of Maine Observing System Inc   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MAINE   (United States)

^d National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service   (United States)

^e CENTER FOR COASTAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND BIOMOLECULAR RESEARCH   (United States)

^f Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548954986     PISSN: 10428275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5670/oceanog.2003.10     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams, R. et al., 2000: The Economics of ISOOS: Benefits and the Rational For Public Funding. NOAA Office of Policy and Strategic Planning.
2. Altalo, M., 2000: Defining the Requirements of the U.S. Energy Industry for Climate, Weather and Ocean Information. NOAA Office of Oceanic and Atmospheric Research.
3. Altalo, M., C. Summerhayes, N. Flemming and P. Bernal, 2003: Demand side "pull" for EuroGOOS products: Identifying market and policy decisions impacted by new environmental information. In: Building the European Capacity in Operational Oceanography-Proceedings of the Third International Conference on EuroGOOS. Elsevier Press.
4. Altalo, M. and M. Hale, 2002: Requirements of the U.S. Recreation and Tourism Industry for Climate, Weather and Ocean Information. NOAA NOS Final Report.
5. Altalo, M., T. Davis and M. Hale, 2003: Northeast Energy Network Performance Analysis in Support of an Improved Energy Transmission Regime. NOAA Final Report.
6. Altalo, M. and M. Hale, 2003: Regional Market and Policy Imperatives as Driver for the U.S. Coastal Global Ocean Observing System Design: Northeast and Great Lakes. NOAA NOS Final Report.
7. Bishop, R. et al., 2000: Benefits of a sustained ocean observing system. Report for Global Ocean Observing thing. NOAA publication.
8. Bogden, P. and E. Richert, 2003: GoMOOS: An Institutional Structure in Support of Regional Marine Research, Operations and Applications. In press.
9. Chen, C. and B. McCarl., 2000: The Value of ENSO Information to Agriculture. Department of Economics, Texas A&M University.
10. Colgan, C., 2003: The Economic Benefits for Ocean Observing Systems. NOAA Magazine.
11. Dutton, J.A., 2002: Opportunities and Priorities in a New Era for Weather and Climate Services. Bull. Am. Met. Soc., Sept., 2000. 1303-11.
12. Flemming, N., 1999: Dividends from Investing in Ocean Observations: A European Perspective. In: Proceedings of OceanObs 99, October 1999, St. Raphael, France.
13. Kite Powell, H. and C. Colgan, 2001: The Economic Benefits of Coastal Ocean Observing Systems: The Gulf of Maine. NOAA Office of Policy and Strategic Planning
14. NOAA Economic Statistics, 2002: NOAA, Office of Policy and Strategic Planning, May 2002.
15. Rogers, D., M. Altalo and R. Spinrad, 2002: Marine Information for Shipping and Defense. In: Oceans 2020: Science, Trends, and the Challenge of Sustainability. J.G. Field, G. Hempel and C.P. Summerhayes, eds, Island Press.
16. Sassone P.G. and R. Weiher, 1999: Cost-Benefit Analysis of TOGA and the ENSO Observing System. In: Improving El Niño Forecasting: The Potential Economic Benefits. R. Weiher, ed., NOAA Office of Policy and Strategic Planning.
17. Solow, A. et al., 1998. The Value of Improved ENSO Prediction to U.S. Agriculture. Climate Change 39:47-60.
18. Weiher, R., 1999: The Value of Weather Forecasts. MIT Energy and Environment Policy Workshop, Cambridge, MA., available from rodney.f. weiher@ noaa. gov.