Recollection biases in hindsight judgments

Social Cognition

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 114-131

  Erdfelder, Edgar ^a   Brandt, Martin ^a   Bröder, Arndt ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH ON COLLECTIVE GOODS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35548951743     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.114     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 57-86.
2. Bäuml, K. -H. (1991). Retroaktive Hemmung: Der Einfluss des interpolierten Kategorienmaterials auf die Verfügbarkeit von Information [Retroactive inhibition: The influence of interpolated, material on the accessibility of information]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 38, 169-187.
3. Bayen, U. J., Erdfelder, E., Bearden, J. N., & Lozito, J. P. (2006). The interplay of memory and judgment in effects of aging on hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1003-1018.
4. Blank, H. (2002). The role of horizontal categorization in retroactive and proactive interference. Experimental Psychology, 49, 196-207.
5. Blank, H., Fischer, V., & Erdfelder, E. (2003). Hindsight bias in political elections. Memory, 11, 491-504.
6. Bröder, A., & Erdfelder, E. (1997). Hindsight Bias: beeinträchtigte Erinnerung, verzerrte Rekonstruktion oder beides? [Hindsight bias: Memory impairment, biased, reconstruction, or both?]. In H. Mandl (Ed.), Bericht über den 40. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in München 1996 (pp. 31-36). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
7. Dehn, D., & Erdfelder, E. (1998). What kind of bias is hindsight bias? Psychological Research, 61, 135-146.
8. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387-414.
9. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight ≠ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288-299.
10. Hawkins, S. A., & Hastie, R. (1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 311-327.
11. Hell, W., Gigerenzer, G., Gauggel, S., Mall, M., & Müller, M. (1988). Hindsight bias: An interaction of automatic and motivational factors? Memory & Cognition, 16, 533-538.
12. Hertwig, R., Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1997). The reiteration effect in hindsight bias. Psychological Review, 104, 194-202.
13. Hoffrage, U., Hertwig, R., & Gigerenzer, G. (2000). Hindsight bias: A by-product of knowledge updating? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 566-581.
14. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
15. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Deceiving the elderly: Effects of accessibility bias in cued-recall performance. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 417-436.
16. McCloskey, M., & Zaragoza, M. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1-16.
17. McGeoch, J.A., & McDonald, W.T. (1931). Meaningful relation and retroactive inhibition. American Journal of Psychology, 43, 579-588.
18. Mussweiler, T., & Strack, F. (1999). Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 136-164.
19. Newton, J.M., & Wickens, D.D. (1956). Retroactive inhibition as a function of the temporal position of interpolated learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 149-154.
20. Pohl, R. F. (1993). Der Rückschau-Fehler. Ein Modell zur Analyse und Erklärung systematisch verfälschter Erinnerungen. [Hindsight bias. A model to analyze and to explain systematically distorted recollections]. Habilitationsschrift [Habilitation thesis]. Trier, Germany: Fb-Psychologie der Universität Trier.
21. Pohl, R. F. (1998). The effects of feedback source and plausibility on hindsight bias. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 191-212.
22. Pohl, R. F. (2004). Hindsight bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: A handbook on fallacies and biases in thinking, judgement, and memory (pp. 363-378). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
23. Pohl, R. F., Eisenhauer, M., & Hardt, O. (2003). SARA: A cognitive process model to simulate the anchoring effect and hindsight bias. Memory, 11, 337-356.
24. Pohl, R. F., & Gawlik, B. (1995). Hindsight bias and the misinformation effect: Separating blended recollections from other recollection types. Memory, 3, 21-55.
25. Pohl, R. F., Ludwig, M. & Ganner, J. (1999). Kein Zusammenhang zwischen Grad der Elaboration und Ausmaß des Rückschaufehlers [Degree of elaboration and strength of hindsight bias are unrelated]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 46, 275-287.
26. Postman, L., Stark, K., & Fraser, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
27. Postman, L., & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Critical issues in interference theory. Memory & Cognition, 1, 19-40.
28. Ruoss, M. (1997). Schmerzpatienten zeigen einen höheren Hindsight Bias [Pain patients show a stronger hindsight bias]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 44, 561-588.
29. Ruoss, M., & Becker, H. -W. (2001). Der Hindsight Bias trägt zur Chronifizierung von Schmerzen bei [Hindsight bias contributes to chronic pain], Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 209, 316-342.
30. Schwarz, S., & Stahlberg, D. (2003). Strength of hindsight bias as a consequence of meta-cognitions. Memory, 11, 395-410.
31. Stahlberg, D., Eller, F., & Frey, D. (1990). Effekte nachträglicher Informationen auf die Erinnerungsleistung - Zur Konvergenz zweier Forschungsrichtungen. [Effects of post-event information on memory performance; On the convergence of two research programs]. In D. Frey (Ed.), Bericht über den 37. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Kiel 1990. Band 1: Kurzfassungen (p. 143). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
32. Stahlberg, D., Eller, F., Maass, A., & Frey, D. (1995). We knew it all along. Hindsight bias in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63, 46-58.
33. Stahlberg, D., & Maass, A. (1998). Hindsight bias: Impaired memory or biased reconstruction? European Review of Social Psychology, 8, 105-132.
34. Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (1997). Explaining the enigmatic anchoring effect: Mechanisms of selective accessibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 437-446.
35. Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
37. Werth, L., Strack, F., & Förster, J. (2002). Certainty and uncertainty: The two faces of the hindsight bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 323-341.
38. Winman, A., Juslin, P., & Björkman, M. (1998). The confidence-hindsight mirror effect in judgment: An accuracy-assessment model for the knew-it-all-along phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 415-431.