Visual processing speed: Effects of auditory input on visual processing

Developmental Science

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 734-740

  Robinson, Christopher W ^a   Sloutsky, Vladimir M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFANT; KINETICS; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RECOGNITION; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT; KINETICS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 35548949392     PISSN: 1363755X     EISSN: 14677687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00627.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bahrick, L.E. Lickliter, R. (2000). Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Developmental Psychology, 36, 190 201.
2. Campbell, A.L. Namy, L.L. (2003). The role of social-referential context in verbal and nonverbal symbol learning. Child Development, 74, 549 563.
3. Christie, J. Klein, R. (1995). Familiarity and attention: does what we know affect what we notice? Memory and Cognition, 23 (5 547 550.
4. Colavita, F.B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 409 412.
5. Colavita, F.B. Weisberg, D. (1979). A further investigation of visual dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 345 347.
6. Fantz, R.L. (1964). Visual experience in infants: decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science, 46, 668 670.
7. Fernald, A. Hurtado, N. (2006). Names in frames: infants interpret words in sentence frames faster than words in isolation. Developmental Science, 9, F33 F40.
8. Lewkowicz, D.J. (2000). The development of intersensory temporal perception: an epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 281 308.
9. Lickliter, R. Bahrick, L.E. (2000). The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 260 280.
10. Mather, E. Schafer, G. (2005, April). Familiarity and novelty preferences for visual stimuli in the second year of life: initial findings and new directions. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA.
11. Namy, L.L. Waxman, S.R. (2000). Naming and exclaiming: infants' sensitivity to naming contexts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 1, 405 428.
12. Napolitano, A.C. Sloutsky, V.M. (2004). Is a picture worth a thousand words? The flexible nature of modality dominance in young children. Child Development, 75, 1850 1870.
13. Robinson, C.W., Howard, E.M. Sloutsky, V.M. (2005). Mechanisms underlying the effects of labels on cognitive development. In B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXVII Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1878 1882). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
14. Robinson, C.W. Sloutsky, V.M. (2004a). Auditory dominance and its change in the course of development. Child Development, 75, 1387 1401.
15. Robinson, C.W. Sloutsky, V.M. (2004b). The effect of stimulus familiarity on modality dominance. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1167 1172). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
16. Robinson, C.W. Sloutsky, V.M. (2007). Linguistic labels and categorization in infancy: do labels facilitate or hinder? Infancy, 11, 233 253.
17. Roder, B.J., Bushnell, E.W. Sasseville, A.M. (2000). Infants' preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy, 1 (4 491 507.
18. Rose, S.A., Feldman, J.F. Jankowski, J.J. (2002). Processing speed in the 1st year of life: a longitudinal study of preterm and full-term infants. Developmental Psychology, 38, 895 902.
19. Sloutsky, V.M. Napolitano, A. (2003). Is a picture worth a thousand words? Preference for auditory modality in young children. Child Development, 74, 822 833.
20. Waxman, S.R. (2003). Links between object categorization and naming: origins and emergence in human infants. In D.H. Rakison L.M. Oakes (Eds.), Early category and concept development: Making sense of the blooming, buzzing confusion (pp. 213 241). London : Oxford University Press.
21. Woodward, A.L. Hoyne, K.L. (1999). Infants' learning about words and sounds in relation to objects. Child Development, 70, 65 77.
22. Xu, F. (2002). The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy. Cognition, 85, 223 250.