Searching strategies for the Hungarian language

Information Processing and Management

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 310-324

  Savoy, Jacques ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEUCHÂTEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

CLEF; Decompounding; Evaluation; Hungarian information retrieval; Hungarian language; n gram indexing

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; QUERY LANGUAGES; SEARCH ENGINES;

HUNGARIAN LANGUAGE; LIGHT STEMMERS; RETRIEVAL EFFECTIVENESS; SEARCHING STRATEGIES;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 35548942663     PISSN: 03064573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ipm.2007.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abdou S., and Savoy J. Statistical and comparative evaluation of various indexing and search models. Proceedings AIRS 2006 LNCS #4182 (2006), Springer, Berlin 362-373
2. Amati G., and van Rijsbergen C.J. Probabilistic models of information retrieval based on measuring the divergence from randomness. ACM-Transactions on Information Systems 20 4 (2002) 357-389
3. Braschler M., and Peters C. Cross-language evaluation forum: Objective, results, achievements?. IR Journal 7 1-2 (2004) 7-31
4. Braschler M., and Ripplinger B. How effective is stemming and decompounding for German text retrieval?. IR Journal 7 3-4 (2004) 291-316
5. Buckley C., Singhal A., Mitra M., and Salton G. New retrieval approaches using smart. Proceedings of TREC-4 (1996), The NIST Publication, Gaithersburg 25-48
6. Buckley C., and Voorhees E. Retrieval system evaluation. TREC, experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005), The MIT Press, Cambridge 53-75
7. Chen A. Cross-language retrieval experiments at CLEF 2002. Advances in cross-language information retrieval LNCS #2785 (2003), Springer, Berlin 28-48
8. Di Nunzio G.M., Ferro N., Melucci M., and Orio N. Experiments to evaluate probabilistic models for automatic stemmer generation and query word translation. Comparative evaluation of multilingual information access systems LNCS #3237 (2004), Springer, Berlin 220-235
9. Fox C. A stop list for general text. SIGIR Forum 24 1-2 (1990) 19-35
10. Gordon M., and Pathak P. Finding information on the world wide web: The retrieval effectiveness of search engines. Information Processing and Management 35 2 (1999) 141-180
11. Haláscy, P. (2006). Benefits of deep NLP-based lemmatization for information retrieval. http://clef.iei.pi.cnr.it/2006/working_notes/workingnotes2006/halacsyCLEF2006.pdf.
12. Harman D. How effective is suffixing?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 42 1 (1991) 7-15
13. Harman D.K. The TREC ad hoc experiments. TREC, experiment and evaluation in information retrieval (2005), The MIT Press, Cambridge 79-97
14. Harter S.P. Online information retrieval: concepts, principles and techniques (1986), Academic Press, San Diego
15. Hiemstra, D. (2000). Using language models for information retrieval. CTIT Ph.D. Thesis.
16. Hull D. Stemming algorithms: A case study for detailed evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 47 1 (1996) 70-84
17. Kettunen K., and Airo E. Is a morphologically complex language really that complex in full-text retrieval?. Advances in Natural Language Processing LNCS #4139 (2006), Springer, Berlin 411-422
18. Korenius T., Laurikkala J., Järvelin K., and Juhola M. Stemming and lemmatization in the clustering of Finnish text documents. Proceedings of the ACM-CIKM (2004), The ACM Press, New York 625-633
19. Krovetz R. Viewing morphology as an inference process. Proceedings of the ACM-SIGIR (1993), The ACM Press, New York 191-202
20. Lovins J.B. Development of a stemming algorithm. Mechanical Translation and Computational Linguistics 11 1 (1968) 22-31
21. McNamee P., and Mayfield J. Character n-gram tokenization for European language text retrieval. IR Journal 7 1-2 (2004) 73-97
22. Moulinier I. Thomson Legal and Regulatory at NTCIR-4: Monolingual and pivot-language retrieval experiments. Proceedings NTCIR-4 (2004), National Institute of Informatics, Tokyo 158-171
23. Noriko, K., (Ed.). (2005). NTCIR Workshop 5 Meeting. Tokyo: National Institute of Informatics.
24. In: Peters C., Gonzalo J., Braschler M., and Kluck M. (Eds). Comparative evaluation of multilingual information access systems LNCS #3237 (2004), Spinger-Verlag, Berlin
25. In: Peters C., Gey F.C., Gonzalo J., Müller H., Jones G.J.F., Kluck M., et al. (Eds). Accessing multilingual information repositories LNCS #4022 (2006), Spinger-Verlag, Berlin
26. Porter M.F. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program 14 3 (1980) 130-137
27. Robertson S.E., Walker S., and Beaulieu M. Experimentation as a way of life: Okapi at trec. Information Processing and Management 36 1 (2000) 95-108
28. Savoy J. Stemming of French words based on grammatical category. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 44 1 (1993) 1-9
29. Savoy J. Statistical inference in retrieval effectiveness evaluation. Information Processing and Management 33 4 (1997) 495-512
30. Savoy J. A stemming procedure and stopword list for general French corpora. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 10 (1999) 944-952
31. Savoy, J. (2003). Report on CLEF 2002 experiments. Advances in cross-language information retrieval (LNCS #2785, pp. 66-90). Berlin: Springer.
32. Savoy, J. (2004). Report on CLEF 2003 monolingual tracks. Comparative evaluation of multilingual information access systems (LNCS #3237, pp. 322-336). Berlin: Springer.
33. Sproat R. Morphology and computation (1992), The MIT Press, Cambridge
34. TM at CLEF 2003. Comparative evaluation of multilingual information access systems LNCS #3237 (2004), Springer, Berlin 286-300
35. Xu J., and Croft B. Corpus-based stemming using cooccurrence of word variants. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 16 1 (1998) 61-81