Productivity costs associated with cardiometabolic risk factor clusters in the United States

Value in Health

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 443-450

  Sullivan, Patrick W ^a   Ghushchyan, Vahram ^a   Wyatt, Holly R ^a   Wu, Eric Q ^b   Hill, James O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^b ANALYSIS GROUP   (United States)

Author keywords

Cardiovascular disease; Cost and cost analyses; Indirect costs; Productivity; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COST OF ILLNESS; EFFICIENCY; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METABOLIC SYNDROME X; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREVALENCE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK FACTORS; SICK LEAVE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 35548934140     PISSN: 10983015     EISSN: 15244733     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00199.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M. The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005 28 : 2289 304.
2. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2005 Update. Dallas, TX : American Heart Association, 2005.
3. Ford ES. Risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes associated with the metabolic syndrome: a summary of the evidence. Diabetes Care 2005 28 : 1769 78.
4. Bonow RO, Smaha LA, Smith SC Jr, et al. World Heart Day 2002: the international burden of cardiovascular disease: responding to the emerging global epidemic. Circulation 2002 106 : 1602 5.
5. Guico-Pabia CJ, Murray JF, Teutsch SM, et al. Indirect cost of ischemic heart disease to employers. Am J Manag Care 2001 7 : 27 34.
6. Zwerling C, Whitten PS, Sprince NL, et al. Workforce participation by persons with disabilities: the national health interview survey disability supplement, 1994 to 1995. J Occup Environ Med 2002 44 : 358 64.
7. Grover SA, Ho V, Lavoie F, et al. The importance of indirect costs in primary cardiovascular disease prevention: can we save lives and money with statins? Arch Intern Med 2003 163 : 333 9.
8. Reynolds MW, Frame D, Scheye R, et al. A systematic review of the economic burden of chronic angina. Am J Manag Care 2004 10 (11 Suppl. S347 57.
9. Zethraeus N, Molin T, Henriksson P, Jonsson B. Costs of coronary heart disease and stroke: the case of Sweden. J Intern Med 1999 246 : 151 9.
10. Hartunian NS, Smart CN, Thompson MS. The incidence and economic costs of cancer, motor vehicle injuries, coronary heart disease, and stroke: a comparative analysis. Am J Public Health 1980 70 : 1249 60.
11. Chestnut LG, Keller LR, Lambert WE, Rowe RD. Measuring heart patients' willingness to pay for changes in angina symptoms. Med Decis Making 1996 16 : 65 77.
12. Goetzel RZ, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S. The health and productivity cost burden of the "top 10" physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2003 45 : 5 14.
13. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. PUF Documentation Files. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Available from: http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/PUFFiles/H60/H60doc.htm [Accessed April 28, 2006].
14. Machlin S, Wu W, Zodet M. Computing Standard Errors for MEPS Estimates. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available from: http://www.meps. ahrq.gov/mepsweb/survey_comp/standard_errors.jsp.[AccessedDecember,2003].
15. Elixhauser A, Andrews RM, Fox S. Clinical Classifications for Health Policy Research: Discharge Statistics by Principal Diagnosis and Procedure. Rockville : Agency for Health Policy and Research, 1993. AHCPR Publication No. 93-0043.
16. United States Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey: Occupational Wages in the United States, 2004. August 2005. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/ncs/ocs/sp/ncbl0727.pdf [Accessed February 6, 2006].
17. Tunceli K, Bradley CJ, Nerenz D, et al. The impact of diabetes on employment and work productivity. Diabetes Care 2005 28 : 2662 7.
18. Vijan S, Hayward RA, Langa KM. The impact of diabetes on workforce participation: results from a national household sample. Health Serv Res 2004 39 (6 Pt 1 1653 69.
19. Ramsey S, Summers KH, Leong SA, et al. Productivity and medical costs of diabetes in a large employer population. Diabetes Care 2002 25 : 23 9.
20. Ford ES. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome defined by the International Diabetes Federation among adults in the U.S. Diabetes Care 2005 28 : 2745 9.
21. Ford ES, Abbasi F, Reaven GM. Prevalence of insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome with alternative definitions of impaired fasting glucose. Atherosclerosis 2005 181 : 143 8.
22. Federation ID. The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. Available from: http://www.idf.org/webdata/docs/ Metabolic_syndrome_definition.pdf [Accessed November 8, 2006].
23. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB, et al. The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Ann Intern Med 2004 140 : 945 50.
24. Harris MI, Flegal KM, Cowie CC, et al. Prevalence of diabetes, impaired fasting glucose, and impaired glucose tolerance in U.S. adults. Diabetes Care 1998 21 : 518 24.
25. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. The continuing increase of diabetes in the US. Diabetes Care 2001 24 : 412.
26. Hajjar I, Kotchen TA. Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000. JAMA 2003 290 : 199 206.
27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the U.S., 2000. Atlanta, GA : Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002.
28. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, Weinstein MC, eds. Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. New York : Oxford University Press, 1996.
29. Mishan EJ. Evaluating life and limb: a theoretical approach. Polit Econ 1971 79 : 687 705.
30. Edwards DS, Winn DM, Kuriantzik V. Evaluation of the National Health Interview Survey Diagnostic Reporting. Hyattsville, MD : National Center for Health Statistics, 1994.
31. Berkanovic E, Telesky C. Mexican-American, black-American and white-American differences in reporting illnesses, disability and physician visits for illnesses. Soc Sci Med 1985 20 : 567 77.
32. Stewart AL, Napoles-Springer A. Health-related quality-of-life assessments in diverse population groups in the United States. Med Care 2000 38 (9 Suppl. S102 24.
33. Johnson TP, O'Rourke D, Chavez N, Sudman S. Cultural variations in the interpretation of health survey questions. In : Warnecke RB, ed. Health Survey Research Methods. Hyattsville, MD : National Center for Health Statistics, 1996.
34. Palta M, Prineas RJ, Berman R, Hannan P. Comparison of self-reported and measured height and weight. Am J Epidemiol 1982 115 : 223 30.
35. Rowland ML. Self-reported weight and height. Am J Clin Nutr 1990 52 : 1125 33.
36. Greenlund KJ, Zheng ZJ, Keenan NL, et al. Trends in self-reported multiple cardiovascular disease risk factors among adults in the United States, 1991-1999. Arch Intern Med 2004 164 : 181 8.