Disposition: A superfluous construct in teacher education

Journal of Teacher Education

Volumn 58, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 381-387

  Murray, Frank B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Disposition; Explanation; Levels of meaning; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 35449001627     PISSN: 00224871     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0022487107307950     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Cantor, N. (1990). From thought to behavior: "Having" and "doing " in the study of personality and cognition. American Psychologist, 45, 735-750.
2. Carroll, J. (1963). A model for school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
3. Carus, P. (Ed.). (1949). Kant's Prolegomena (Religion of Sciences Library No. 53). La Salle, IL: The Open Court.
4. Gagne R. (1970). The conditions of learning (2 nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
5. Hines, L.M. (2007). Return of the thought police. Education Next, 2, 59-65.
6. Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC). (1992). Model standards for beginning teacher licensure and development. A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
7. Katz, L.G., & Raths, J.D. (1985). Dispositions as goals for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 301-307.
8. O'Gorman, F. (Ed.). (2004). Victorian poetry: An annotated anthology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Raths, J.D. (2007). Experiences with dispositions in teacher education. Unpublished manuscript, University of Delaware, Newark.
10. Reese, H., & Overton, W. (1970). Models and theories of development. In L. Goulet & P. Baltes (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology (pp. 115-145). New York: Academic Press.
11. Underwood, B. (1957). Psychological research. New York: Appleton -Century-Crofts.