Camera calibration from vanishing points in a vision system

Optics and Laser Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 555-561

  He, B W ^a,b   Li, Y F ^c  

^a FUZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b TIANJIN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Geometrically intuitive; Intrinsic parameters; Vanishing and image edges

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDGE DETECTION; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

GEOMETRICALLY INTUITIVE; IMAGE EDGES; INTRINSIC PARAMETERS; TRANSLATION MATRIX;

IMAGING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35448993864     PISSN: 00303992     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.optlastec.2007.09.001     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Faugeras O, Laveau S. Representing three-dimensional data as a collection of images and fundamental matrices for image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on pattern recognition, Jerusalem (Israel), 1994. p. 689-91.
2. Hartley R.I. Lines and points in three views and the trifocal tensor. Int J Comput Vision 22 2 (1997) 125-140
3. Pollefeys M, Koch R, Van Gool L. Self-calibration and metric reconstruction inspite of varying and unknown internal camera parameters. In: Proceedings of sixth IEEE international conference on computer vision, Bombay, India, 1998. p. 90-5.
4. Heyden A, Astrom K. Euclidean reconstruction from constant intrinsic parameters. In: ICPR, Vienna, Austria, 1996. p. 339-43.
5. Triggs B. Auto-calibration and the absolute quadric. In: CVPR, Puerto Rico, 1997. p. 609-14.
6. Pollefeys M, Van Gool L, Proesmans M. Euclidean 3d reconstruction from image sequences with variable focal lengths. In: ECCV, Cambridge, UK, 1996. p. 31-42.
7. Heyden A, Astrom K. Euclidean reconstruction from image sequences with varying and unknown focal length and principal point. In: CVPR, 1997. p. 438-43.
8. Bougnoux S. From projective to Euclidean space under any practical situation, a criticism of self-calibration. In: ICCV, Bombay, 1998. p. 790-6.
9. Polleyeys M, Van Gool L, Osterlinck A. The modulus constraint: anew constraint for self-calibration. In: ICPR, 1996. p. 31-42.
10. Zhang Z.Y. Camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 26 7 (2004) 892-899
11. Wu F.C., Hu Z.Y., and Zhu H.J. Camera calibration with moving one dimensional objects. Pattern Recogn 38 5 (2005) 755-765
12. Hammarstedt P, Sturm P, Heyden A. Degenerate cases and closed-form solutions for camera calibration with one-dimensional objects. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on computer vision, 2005. p. 317-24.
13. Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature 293 (1981) 133-135
14. Guillemaut J.-Y., Aguado A.S., and Illingworth J. Using points at infinity for parameter decoupling in camera calibration. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27 2 (2005) 265-270
15. Caprile B., and Torre V. Using vanishing points for camera calibration. IJCV (1990) 127-140
16. Beardsley P, Murray D. Camera calibration using vanishing points. In: BMVC'92, 1992.
17. Stevenson D, Fleck M. Robot aerobics: Four easy steps to a more flexible calibration. In: ICCV'95, 1995. p. 34-9.
18. Shufelt J.A. Performance evaluation and analysis of vanishing point detection techniques. Pattern Anal Mach Intell 21 3 (1999) 282-288