Inter-rater reliability of pressure ulcer staging: Ordinal probit Bayesian hierarchical model that allows for uncertain rater response

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 26, Issue 25, 2007, Pages 4602-4618

  Gajewski, Byron J ^a   Hart, Sara ^b   Bergquist Beringer, Sandra ^b   Dunton, Nancy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Intraclass correlation coefficient; NDNQI; Random effects model; Rater reliability; Shrinkage

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHI SQUARE TEST; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECUBITUS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL CARE; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PATIENT MONITORING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STAGING; WOUND CARE;

BAYES THEOREM; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRESSURE ULCER; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 35448986503     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.2877     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR), Panel for the Prediction and Prevention of Pressure Ulcers. Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention. AHCPR Publication No. 92-0050, Clinical Practice Guideline, No. 3. AHRQ, Rockville, MD, 1992.
2. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Understanding your body: what are pressure ulcers? Life sciences education and health literacy. AHRQ, Rockville, MD, 2000, accessed via the World Wide Web at: http://www.ahrq.gov/consumer/bodysys/edbody6.htm (August 2000).
3. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure Ulcers in America: Prevalence, Incidence and Implications for the Future. NPAUAP: Reston, VA, 2001.
4. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Pressure ulcers in adults: prediction and prevention, and treatment. AHCPR Publication #92-0047, 2000. AHRQ, Rockville, MD, 2002.
5. Allman R. Pressure ulcers: using what we know to improve quality of care. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 2001; 49:996-997.
6. Allman R, Goode P, Burst N, Bartolucci A, Thomas D. Pressure ulcer, hospital complications, and disease severity: impact on hospital costs and length of stay. Advances in Wound Care 1999; 12:22-30.
7. Langemo KK, Melland H, Hanson K, Olson B, Hunter S. The lived experience of having a pressure ulcer: a qualitative analysis. Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2000; 13:225-235.
8. Szor J, Bourguignon D. Description of pressure ulcer pain at rest and at dressing change. Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 1999; 26:115-120.
9. Gajewski BJ, Thompson S, Dunton N, Becker A, Wrona M. Inter rater reliability of nursing home surveys: a Bayesian latent class approach. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25(2):325-344.
10. Gonin R, Lipsitz SR, Fitzmaurice GM, Molenberghs G. Regression modelling of weighted kappa by using generalized estimating equations. Applied Statistics 2000; 49(1):1-18.
11. Johnson VE, Albert JH. Ordinal Data Modeling. Springer: Berlin, 2001.
12. Donner A, Eliasziw M. Sample size requirements for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine 1987; 6:441-448.
13. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979; 86:420-428.
14. Ridout MS, Demetrio CGB, Firth D. Estimating intraclass correlation for binary data. Biometrics 1999; 55:137-148.
15. Barlow WE. Measurement of interrater agreement with adjustment for covariates. Biometrics 1996; 52:695-702.
16. Donner A, Wells G. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient. Biometrics 1986; 42:401-412.
17. Commenges D, Jacqmin H. The intraclass correlation coefficient: distribution-free definition and test. Biometrics 1994; 50:517-526.
18. Bansal NK, Bhandary M. Robust M-estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient. The Australian Journal of Statistics 1994; 36:297-301.
19. Giraudeau B, Mary JY. Planning a reproducibility study: how many subjects and how many replicates per subject for an expected width of the 95 percent confidence interval of the intraclass correlation coefficient. Statistics in Medicine 2001; 20(21):3205-3214.
20. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. Springer: New York, NY, 2000.
21. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB. Bayesian Data Analysis (2nd edn). Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Washington, DC, 2004.
22. Goldestein H. Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd edn). Oxford University Press: New York, NY, 2003.
23. McCullagh P. Regression models for ordinal data (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1980; 42(2):109-142.
24. Agresti A. Modelling patterns of agreement and disagreement. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1992; 1:201-218.
25. Uebersax JS. A review of modelling approaches for the analysis of observer agreement. Investigative Radiology 1992; 27:738-743.
26. Uebersax JS, Grove WM. A latent trait finite mixture model for the analysis of rating agreement. Biometrics 1993; 49:823-835.
27. Uebersax JS. Statistical modeling of expert ratings on medical treatment appropriateness. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88:421-427.
28. Albert JH, Chib S. Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1993; 88:669-679.
29. Gajewski BJ, Sedwick JD, Antonelli P. A log-normal distribution model of the effect of bacteria and ear fenestration on hearing loss: a Bayesian approach. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23(3):493-508.
30. Tanner TA, Wong WH. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1987; 85:829-839.
31. Mwalili SM, Lesaffre E, Declerck D. A Bayesian ordinal logistic regression model to correct for interobserver measurement error in a geographical oral health study. Applied Statistics 2005; 54(1):77-93.
32. Gilks WR, Thomas A, Spiegelhalter DJ. A language and program for complex Bayesian modelling. Statistician 1994; 43:169-177.
33. Gilks WR, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ. Markov Chain Monte Carlo in Practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: London, U.K., 1996.
34. Spiegelhalter DJ, Best NG, Carlin BP, van der Linde A. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 2002; 64:583-640.
35. Congdon P. Bayesian Statistical Modelling. Wiley: Chichester, 2001.
36. Johnson VE. A Bayesian chi-square test for goodness of fit. Annals of Statistics 2004; 32(6):2361-2384.
37. Gelman A, Meng XL, Stern H. Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies with discussion. Statistica Sinca 1996; 6:733-807.
38. Muthen LK, Muthen BO. Mplus Statistical Analysis with Latent Variables. Muthen & Muthen: Los Angeles, 2001.
39. Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press: New York, 1998.
40. Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press: Washington, DC, 2004.
41. Chib S, Greenberg E. Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika 1998; 85(2):347-361.