An investigation into the Winkler modeling of the cyclic response of rigid footings

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 44-57

  Allotey, Nii ^a   El Naggar, M Hesham ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cyclic; Rocking; Seismic; Settlement; Shallow foundations; Sliding; Winkler model

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CYCLIC LOADS; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SEISMOLOGY; SETTLEMENT OF STRUCTURES;

CYCLIC RESPONSE; ROCKING; WINKLER MODELING;

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

CYCLIC LOADING; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FOOTING; GROUND SETTLEMENT; MODELING; PILE RESPONSE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SLIDING; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; WINKLER FOUNDATION;

EID: 35448986491     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Allotey NK, El Naggar MH. Soil-structure interaction in performance-based design-a review. In: Predictions, analysis and design in geomechanical applications, proceedings of 11th international conference on computational methods and advances in geomechanics, vol. 3, Torino, Italy; 2005, p. 595-602.
2. Auvinet G, Mendoza MJ. Comportamiento de diversos tipos de cimentacion en la zone lascustre de la Ciudad de Mexico durante el sismo del 19 septiembre de 1985. In: Proceedings of symposium-Los Sismos de 1985: casos deMecanica de Suelos, Mexico; 1986 (in Spanish).
3. Gazetas G. SSI issues in two European projects and a recent earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 2nd US-Japan workshop on soil-structure interaction, Tsukuba, Japan; 2001.
4. Comartin CD, Keaton JR, Grant PW, Martin GR, Power MS. Transitions in seismic analysis and design procedures for buildings and their foundations. In: Proceedings of 6th workshop on the improvement of structural design and construction practice in the US and Japan. Applied Technology Council Report, ATC 15-5, Victoria, BC; 1996.
5. Trifunac M.D., and Todorovska M.I. Reduction of structural damage by nonlinear soil response. J Struct Eng ASCE 125 1 (1999) 89-97
6. Paolucci R. Simplified evaluation of earthquake-induced permanent displacements of shallow foundations. J Earthquake Eng 1 3 (1997) 563-579
7. Cremer C., Pecker A., and Davenne L. Cyclic macro-element for soil-structure interaction: material and geometrical nonlinearities. Int J Numer Methods Geomech 25 (2001) 1257-1284
8. Houlsby G.T., and Cassidy M.J. A plasticity model for the behaviour of footings on sand under combined loading. Geotechnique 52 2 (2002) 117-129
9. Gajan S, Thomas JM, Kutter BL. Physical and analytical modeling of cyclic load-deformation behaviour of shallow foundations. In: Proceedings of 57th annual meeting of earthquake engineering research institute, Mexico; 2005.
10. Housner G.W. The behaviour of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 53 (1963) 403-417
11. Chopra A.K., and Yim C.S. Earthquake responses of structures with partial uplift on Winkler foundation. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 12 (1984) 265-281
12. Psycharis I.N., and Jennings P.C. Rocking of slender rigid bodies allowed to uplift. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 11 (1984) 57-76
13. Taylor P.W., Bartlett P.E., and Wiessing P.R. Foundation rocking under earthquake loading. Proceedings of 10th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering vol. 3 (1981), AA Balkema, Stockholm, Sweden, Rotterdam, Netherlands 313-322
14. Filiatrault A., Anderson D.L., and DeVall R.H. Effect of weak foundation on the seismic response of core-wall type buildings. Can J Civ Eng 19 (1992) 530-539
15. Anderson D.L. Effect of foundation rocking on the seismic response of shear walls. Can J Civ Eng 30 (2003) 360-365
16. Chen X.C., and Lai Y.M. Seismic response of bridge piers on elastic-plastic Winkler foundation allowed to uplift. J Sound Vib 266 5 (2003) 957-965
17. Gazetas G, Apostolou M. Nonlinear soil-structure interaction: foundation uplifting and soil yielding. In: Proceedings of 3rd US-Japan workshop on soil-structure interaction, Menlo Park, California; 2004.
18. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). FEMA 273/274-NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, vol. I-guidelines, vol. II-commentary, Washington, DC, 1997.
19. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). FEMA-356-Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Washington, DC, 2000.
20. Allotey NK, El Naggar MH. Cyclic soil-structure interaction model for performance-based design. In: Proceedings of geotechnical earthquake engineering satellite conference, TC4, ISSMGE, Osaka, Japan; 2005. p. 30-7.
21. SeismoSoft (2003). SeismoStruct-a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures. Available Online: 〈http://www.seismosoft.com〉.
22. Zeng X., and Steedman R.S. Bearing capacity of shallow foundations. Geotechnique 48 2 (1998) 235-256
23. Maugeri M., Musumeci G., Novita D., and Taylor C.A. Shaking table test of failure of a shallow foundation subjected to an eccentric load. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 20 (2000) 435-444
24. Allotey NK. Nonlinear soil-structure interaction in performance-based design. Ph.D. thesis, University of Western Ontario, London, Ont., Canada; 2006.
25. Allotey N.K., and El Naggar M.H. Analytic moment-rotation curves for rigid foundations based on a Winkler model. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 23 (2003) 367-381
26. Pecker A. Analytic formulae for the seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip foundations. In: Pinto S. (Ed). Seismic behaviour of ground and geotechnical structures (1997), AA Balkema, Rotterdam, Netherlands 261-268
27. Cassidy M.J., Byrne B.W., and Randolph M.F. A comparison of the combined load behaviour of spudcan and caisson foundations on soft normally consolidated clay. Geotechnique 54 2 (2004) 91-106
28. Vesic A.S. Analysis of ultimate loads on shallow foundations. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 98 SM3 (1973) 45-73
29. Schultze E. Distribution of stress distribution beneath a rigid foundation. In: Proceedings of 5th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, vol. 6; 1961. p. 807-13.
30. Kerr A.D. Tests and analysis of footings on a sand base. Soils Found 29 3 (1989) 83-94
31. Allotey NK, El Naggar MH. Modeling of cyclic response of shallow foundations with Winkler model: some issues. In: Proceedings of 9th Canadian conference on earthquake engineering, Paper no. 1156, Ottawa, Ont., Canada; 2007.
32. Negro P, Verzeletti G, Molina J, Pedretti S, Lo Presti D, Pedroni S. Large scale geotechnical experiments on soil-foundation interaction. In: Special Publication no. I.98.73, European Commission Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy; 1998.
33. Knappet J.A., Haigh S.K., and Madabhushi S.P.G. Mechanisms of failure for shallow foundations under earthquake loading. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 26 (2006) 91-102
34. Negro P, Paolucci R, Pedretti S, Faccioli E. Large scale soil-structure interaction experiments on sand under cyclic load. In: Proceedings of 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Paper no. 1191, Auckland, New Zealand; 2000.
35. Pais A., and Kausel E. Approximate formulas for dynamic stiffnesses of rigid foundations. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 7 4 (1988) 213-228
36. Faccioli E, Paolucci R, Vivero G. Investigation of seismic soil-footing interaction by large scale cyclic tests and analytical models. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, Paper no. SPL-5, San Diego, California; 2001.
37. Kutter BL, Martin G, Hutchinson TC, Harden C, Gajan S, Phalen JD. Study of modeling of nonlinear cyclic load-deformation behavior of shallow foundations. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Workshop Report, University of California, Davis; 2003.
38. Gajan S., Kutter B.L., Phalen J.D., Hutchinson T.C., and Martin G.R. Centrifuge modeling of load-deformation behaviour of shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 25 (2005) 773-783
39. Butterfield R., and Gottardi G. A complete three-dimensional failure envelope for shallow footings on sand. Geotechnique 44 1 (1994) 181-184
40. Okamura M., Mihara A., Takemura J., and Kuwano J. Effects of footing size and aspect ratio on the bearing capacity of sand subjected to eccentric loading. Soils Found 42 4 (2002) 43-56
41. Kucukarslan S., and Banarjee P.K. Behaviour of axially loaded pile group under lateral cyclic loading. Eng Struct 25 (2003) 303-311
42. Allotey N.K., and Foschi R.O. Coupled p-y t-z analysis of single piles in cohesionless soil under vertical and/or horizontal ground motion. J Earthquake Eng 9 6 (2005) 755-776
43. Gajan S, Phalen JD, Kutter BL. Soil-foundation-structure interaction: shallow foundations. Centrifuge Data Report for SSG02, Report no. UCD/CGMDR-03/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, University of California, Davis; 2003.