YETI: A graduallY extensible trace interpreter

VEE'07: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Virtual Execution Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 83-93

  Zaleski, Mathew ^a   Brown, Angela Demke ^a   Stoodley, Kevin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b IBM TORONTO LAB   (Canada)

Author keywords

Interpreter; JIT compiler; Mixed mode; Traces

Indexed keywords

JIT COMPILER; MIXED MODE; MIXED-MODE SYSTEMS; PACKAGING VIRTUAL INSTRUCTIONS; SPEED OF EXECUTION;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE PORTABILITY; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; PROGRAM COMPILERS; PROGRAM INTERPRETERS;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 35448980366     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1254810.1254823     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. V. Bala, E. Duesterwald, and S. Banerjia. Dynamo: A transparent dynamic optimization system. In Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN 2000 Conf. on Prog. Language Design and Impl., pages 1-12, Jun. 2000.
2. M. Berndl, B. Vitale, M. Zaleski, and A. D. Brown. Context threading: A flexible and efficient dispatch technique for virtual machine interpreters. In Proc. of the 3rd Intl. Symp. on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 15-26, Mar. 2005.
3. D. Bruening and E. Duesterwald. Exploring optimal compilation unit shapes for an embedded just-in-time compiler. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-3), Dec. 2000.
4. D. Bruening, T. Garnett, and S. Amarasinghe. An infrastructure for adaptive dynamic optimization. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Symp. on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 265-275, Mar. 2003.
5. W.-K. Chen, S. Lemer, R. Chaiken, and D. Gillies. Mojo: A dynamic optimization system. In Proc. of the 3rd ACM Workshop on Feedback-Directed and Dynamic Optimization (FDDO-3), Dec. 2000.
6. J. C. Dehnert, B. K. Grant, J. P. Banning, R. Johnson, T. Kistler, A. Klaiber, and J. Mattson. The Transmeta code morphing software: Using speculation, recovery, and adaptive retranslation to address real-life challenges. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Symp. on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 15 24, Mar. 2003.
7. K. Driesen. Efficient Polymorphic Calls. Klumer Academic Publishers, 2001.
8. E. Duesterwald and V. Bala. Software profiling for hot path prediction: less is more. ACM SIGPLAN Notices, 35(11):202-211, 2000.
9. M. A. Ertl. Stack caching for interpreters. In Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN 1995 Corf. on Prog. Language Design and Impl., pages 315-327, June 1995.
10. M. A. Ertl and D. Gregg. Optimizing indirect branch prediction accuracy in virtual machine interpreters. In Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN 2003 Corf. on Prog. Language Design and Impl., pages 278-288, June 2003.
11. E. Gagnon and L. Hendren. Effective inline threading of Java bytecode using preparation sequences. In Proc. of the 12th Intl. Corf. on Compiler Construction, volume 2622 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 170-184. Springer, Apr. 2003.
12. A. Gal, C. W. Probst, and M. Franz. HotpathVM: an effective JIT compiler for resource-constrained devices. In Proc. of the 2nd Intl. Corf. on Virtual Execution Environments, pages 144-153, 2006.
13. K. Hazelwood and D. Grove. Adaptive online context-sensitive inlining. In Proc. of the 1st Intl. Symp. on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 253-264, Mar. 2003.
14. D. Hiniker, K. Hazelwood, and M. D. Smith. Improving region selection in dynamic optimization systems. In Proc. of the 38th Intl. Symp. on Microarchitecture, pages 141-154, Nov. 2005.
15. U. Hölzle. Adaptive Optimization For Self:Reconciling High Performance With Exploratory Programming. PhD thesis, Stanford University, 1994.
16. R. Lougher. JamVM [online]. Available from: http://jamvm.sourceforge.net/ .
17. M. Paleczny, C. Vick, and C. Click. The Java HotSpot™ server compiler. In Proc. of the USENIX Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium, pages 1-12, Apr. 2001.
18. I. Pechtchanski and V. Sarkar. Dynamic optimistic interprocedural analysis: A framework and an application. In Proc. of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 195-210, Oct. 2001.
19. I. Piumarta. Ccg: A tool for writing dynamic code generators. In OOPSLA'99 Workshop on simplicity, performance and portability in virtual machine design, Nov. 1999.
20. I. Piumarta and F. Riccardi. Optimizing direct-threaded code by selective inlining. In Proc. of the ACM SIGPLAN 1998 Corf. on Prog. Language Design and Impl., pages 291-300, June 1998.
21. SPECjvm98 benchmarks [online]. 1998. Available from: http://www.spec.org/ osg/jvm98/.
22. D. Sugalski. Implementing an interpreter [online]. Available from: http://www.sidhe.org/%7Edan/presentations/ Parrot%20Implementation.ppt. Notes for slide 21.
23. T. Suganuma, T. Ogasawara, M. Takeuchi, T. Yasue, M. Kawahito, K. Ishizaki, H. Komatsu, and T. Nakatani. Overview of the IBM Java just-in-time compiler. IBM Systems Journals, Java Performance Issue, 39(1), Feb. 2000.
24. T. Suganuma, T. Yasue, and T. Nakatani. A region-based compilation technique for dynamic compilers. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst., 28(1):134-174, 2006.
25. V. Sundaresan, D. Maier, P. Ramarao, and M. Stoodley. Experiences with multi-threading and dynamic class loading in a Java just-in-time compiler. In Proc. of the 4th Intl. Symp. on Code Generation and Optimization, pages 87-97, Mar. 2006.
26. D. Ungar, R. B. Smith, C. Chambers, and U. Hölzle. Object, message, and performance: how they coexist in Self. IEEE-COMPUTER, 25(10):53-64, Oct. 1992.
27. J. Whaley. Partial method compilation using dynamic profile information. In Proc. of the 16th ACM SIGPLAN Conf. on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 166-179, Oct. 2001.