Data-driven approaches for information structure identification

HLT/EMNLP 2005 - Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 9-16

  Postolache, Oana ^a   Kruijff Korbayová, Ivana ^a   Kruijff, Geert Jan M ^b  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b GERMAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DFKI   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; DECISION TREES; FORESTRY;

AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION; BASELINE SYSTEMS; DATA-DRIVEN APPROACH; DERIVED FEATURES; INFORMATION STRUCTURES; NODE ATTRIBUTE; PRAGUE DEPENDENCY TREEBANK; RULE INDUCTION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35448949100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1220575.1220577     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Eva Buráňová, Eva Hajičová, and Petr Sgall. 2000. Tagging of very large corpora: Topic-Focus Articulation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), pages 139-144.
2. Jan Hajič. 1998. Building a syntactically annotated corpus: The Prague Dependency Treebank. In Eva Hajičová, editor, Issues of valency and Meaning. Studies in Honor of Jarmila Panevová. Karolinum, Prague.
3. Eva Hajičová and Petr Sgall. 2001. Topic-focus and salience. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2001), pages 268-273, Toulose, France.
4. Eva Hajičová, Barbara Partee, and Petr Sgall. 1998. Topic-focus articulation, tripartite structures, and semantic content. In Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy, number 71. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
5. M. Halliday. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in english, part ii. Journal of Linguistic, (3):199-244.
6. Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová and Mark Steedman. 2003. Discourse and Information Structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, (12):249-259.
7. Ivana Kruijff-Korbayová, Stina Erricson, Kepa J. Rodrígues, and Elena Karagjosova. 2003. Producing Contextually Appropriate Intonation in an Information-State Based Dialog System. In Proceeding of European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Budapest, Hungary.
8. Johanna Moore, Mary Ellen Foster, Oliver Lemon, and Michael White. 2004. Generating Tailored, Comparative Description in Spoken Dialogue. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Sociey Conference.
9. Scott Prevost and Mark Steedman. 1994. Information Based Intonation Synthesis. In Proceedings of the ARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, Princeton, USA.
10. Petr Sgall, Eva Hajičová, and Jarmila Panevová. 1986. The Meaning of the Sentence in Its Semantic and Pragmatic Aspects. Reidel, Dordrecht.
11. Petr Sgall. 1967. Functional sentence perspective in a generative description. Prague Studies in Mathematical Linguistics, (2):203-225.
12. Mark Steedman. 2000. Information Structure and the syntax-phonology interface. Linguistic Inquiry, (34):649-689.
13. Malgorzata Stys and Stefan Zemke. 1995. Incorporating Discourse Aspects in English-Polish MT: Towards Robust Implementation. In Recent Advances in NLP, Velingrad, Bulgaria.
14. Enrich Vallduví and Maria Vilkuna. 1998. On rheme and kontrast. In P. Culicover and L. McNally, editors, Syntax and Semantics Vol 29: The Limits of Syntax. Academic Press, San Diego.
15. Enrich Vallduví. 1990. The information component. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
16. Frantisěk Cěrmaḱ. 1997. Czech National Corpus: A Case in Many Contexts. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, (2):181-197.
17. Kateřina Veselá, Jiří Havelka, and Eva Hajičova. 2004. Annotators' Agreement: The Case of Topic-Focus Articulation. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2004).
18. Ian H. Witten and Eibe Frank. 2000. Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.