Implementation evaluation of the Blueprint multi-component drug prevention programme: Fidelity of school component delivery

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 653-664

  Stead, Martine ^a,b   Stradling, Robert ^b   MacNeil, Morag ^b   MacKintosh, Anne Marie ^a   Minty, Sarah ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^c LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drug education; Evaluation; Fidelity; Implementation; School; UK

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CURRICULUM; EVALUATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHOOL; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; STANDARD; STUDENT; UNITED KINGDOM; UNIVERSITY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CURRICULUM; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FACULTY; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 35448948185     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09595230701613809     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Mihalic S. The importance of implementation fidelity. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence, Colorado University, 2000.
2. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M, Hansen WB. A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 2003;18:237-56.
3. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Filazzola AD, Botvin EM. A cognitive-behavioral approach to substance abuse prevention: one-year follow-up. Addict Behav 1990;15:47-63.
4. Battistich V, Schaps E, Watson M, Solomon D. Prevention effects of the child development project early findings from an ongoing multisite demonstration trial. J Adolesc Res 1996;11:12-35.
5. Hansen WB, Graham JW, Wokenstein BH, Rohrbach LA. Program integrity as a moderator of prevention program effectiveness: results for fifth-grade students in the Adolescent Alcohol Prevention Trial. J Stud Alcohol 1991;52: 568-79.
6. Dane AV, Schneider BH. Program integrity in primary and early secondary intervention: are implementation effects out of control? Clin Psychol Rev 1998;18:23-4.
7. Gottfredson GD, Gottfredson DC, Czeh ER. National study of delinquency prevention in schools. Maryland, USA: Gottfredson Associates, 2000.
8. Domitrovich CE, Greenberg MT. The study of implementation: current findings from effective programs for school aged children. J Educ Psychol Consult 2000;11:193-222.
9. Dent CW, Sussman S, Hennesy M, et al. Implementation and process evaluation of a school-based drug abuse prevention program: project towards no drug abuse. J Drug Educ 1998;28:361-75.
10. Basen-Engquist K, O'Hara-Tompkins N, Lovato CY, Lewis MJ, Parcel GS, Gingiss P. The effect of two types of teacher training on implementation of Smart Choices: a tobacco prevention curriculum. J School Health 1994;64:334-9.
11. Giles SM, Harrington NG, Fearnow-Kenney M. Evaluation of the All Stars Program: student and teacher factors that influence mediators of substance use. J Drug Educ 2001;31:385-97.
12. Pentz MA, Trebow EA, Hansen WB, et al. Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: the Midwestern Prevention Project. Adolesc Drug Use Behav 1990;14:264-89.
13. Harachi TW, Abbott RD, Catalano RF, Haggerty KP, Fleming CB. Opening the black box: using process evaluation measures to assess implementation and theory building. Am J Commun Psychol 1999;27:711-31.
14. Baker PJ. Developing a Blueprint for evidence-based drug prevention in England. Drugs Educ Prev Policy 2006; 13:17-32.
15. Flynn BS, Worden JK, Seeker-Walker RH, Badger GJ, Geller BM, Costanza MC. Prevention of cigarette smoking through mass media intervention and school programs. Am J Public Health 1992;82:827-34.
16. Johnson CA, Pentz MA, Weber MD, et al. Relative effectiveness of comprehensive community programming for drug abuse prevention with high risk and low risk adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990;58:447-56.
17. Pentz MA, Dwyer JH, MacKinnon DP, et al. A multi-community trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse. JAMA 1989;261:3259-66.
18. Perry CL, Kelder SH, Murray DM, Klepp K-I. Community-wide smoking prevention: Long-term outcomes of the Minnesota Heart Health Program and the Class of 1989 Study. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1210-16.
19. UNDCP. A participatory youth handbook for drug abuse prevention programmes. New York: United Nations, 2002.
20. White D, Pitts M. Educating young people about drugs: a systematic review. Addiction 1998;93:1475-87.
21. Tobler N, Stratton H. Effectiveness of school-based drug prevention programs: a meta-analysis of the literature. J Prim Prev 1997;18:71-128.
22. Tobler NS, Roona MR, Ochshorn P, Marshall DG, Streke AV, Stackpole KM. School-based adolescent drug prevention programs: 1998 meta-analysis. J Prim Prev 2000;20:275-336.
23. Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs. A systematic review. Addict Behav 2002;27:1009-23.
24. Midford R, Munro G, McBride N, Snow P, Ladzinski U. Principles that underpin effective school-based drug education. J Drug Educ 2002;32:363-86.
25. Gottfredson DC, Wilson DB. Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prev Sci 2003;4:27-38.
26. MacKinnon DP, Johnson CA, Pentz MA, et al. Mediating mechanisms in a school-based drug prevention program: first-year effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project. Health Psychol 1991;10:164-72.
27. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Tortu S, Botvin EM. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multimodal cognitive-behavioural approach: results of a 3-year study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1990b;58:437-46.
28. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz T, Scheier LM, Williams C, Epstein JA. Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addict Behav 2000;25:769-74.
29. Botvin GJ, Griffin KW, Diaz R, Ifill-Williams M. Drug abuse prevention among minority adolescents: posttest and one-year follow-up of a school-based preventive intervention. Prev Sci 2001;2:1-13.
30. Dusenbury L, Falco M. Eleven components of effective drug abuse prevention curricula. J School Health 1995;65:420-5.
31. Botvin GJ. Preventing drug abuse in schools: social and competence enhancement approaches targeting individual-level etiologic factors. Addict Behav 2000;25:887-97.
32. Hansen WB. School-based substance abuse prevention: a review of the state of the art in curriculum. Health Educ Res 1992;7:403-30.
33. Hansen WB, Graham JW. Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Prev Med 1991;20:414-30.
34. Stead M, Angus K. A review of the content and implementation of selected 'normative' prevention curricula, prepared for the Home Office and COI. Glasgow: Centre for Social Marketing, Strathclyde University, 2002.
35. Donaldson SI, Graham JW, Hansen WB. Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. J Behav Med 1994;17:195-216.
36. Donaldson SI, Graham JW, Piccinin AM, Hansen WB. Resistance skills training and the onset of alcohol use: evidence for beneficial and potentially harmful effects in public schools as in private Catholic schools. Health Psychol 1995;14:291-300.
37. Front Line Research. Blueprint resources: styles of illustration. COI Ref: 257367. London: Central Office of Information, 2003.
38. Front Line Research. Blueprint lessons 2 and 3. Report on qualitative research with year 8 pupils. COI Ref: 261146. London: Central Office of Information, 2004.
39. Botvin GJ, Baker E, Dusenbury L, Botvin EM, Diaz T. Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA 1995;273:1106-12.
40. Velleman R, Mistral W, Sanderling L. Taking the message home: involving parents in drugs prevention. London: Home Office, 2000.
41. Dishion TJ, Andrews DW, Kavanagh K, Soberman LH. Preventive interventions for high-risk youth: the adolescent transitions program. In: Peters R DeV, McMahon RJ, eds. Preventing childhood disorders, substance abuse, and delinquency. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1996:184-214.
42. Kumpfer KL. Selective prevention interventions: the Strengthening Families program. In: Ashery RS, Robertson E, Kumpfer KL, eds. Drug abuse prevention through family interventions. Rockville, MD: NIDA, 1998:160-207.
43. Kumpfer KL. Identification of drug abuse prevention programs - literature review. Parts A and B. Bethesda, MD: NIDA Resource Center for Health Services Research, 1997.
44. Abbey A, Pilgrim C, Hendrickson P, Buresh S. Evaluation of a family-based substance abuse prevention program targeted for the middle school years. J Drug Educ 2000; 30:213-28.
45. Perry CL, Williams CL, Forster JL, et al. Background, conceptualization and design of a community-wide research-program on adolescent alcohol-use Project Northland. Health Educ Res 1993;8:125-36.
46. Perry CL, Williams CL, Veblen-Mortenson S, et al. Project Northland: outcomes of a community-wide alcohol use prevention program during early adolescence. Am J Public Health 1996;86:956-65.
47. Liddle HA, Hogue A. A family-based, developmentalecological preventive intervention for high-risk adolescents. J Marital Fam Ther 2000;26:265-79.
48. Devlin E, McDermott L, Stead M, Angus K. A review of the effectiveness of youth access interventions. Prepared for Home Office and COI to inform the development of the Blueprint Programme. Glasgow: Centre for Social Marketing, University of Strathclyde, 2002.
49. Dorn N, Murji K. Drug prevention; a review of the English language literature. London: ISDD, 1992.
50. Edwards RW, Jumper-Thurman P,Plested BA, Oetting ER, Swanson L. Community readiness: research to practice. J Commun Psychol 2000;28:291-307.
51. Medical Research Council (MRC). A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: MRC, 2000.
52. Department for Education and Skills and Department of Health (DfES and DoH). National healthy school status. A guide for schools. London: DfES and DoH, 2005.
53. Yeaton WH, Sechrest L. Critical dimensions in the choice and maintenance of successful treatments: Strength, integrity, and effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981;49: 156-67.
54. McBride N, Farrington F, Midford R. Implementing a school drug education programme: reflections on fidelity. Int J Health Prom Educ 2002;40:40-50.
55. Parcel GS, O'Hara-Tompkins NM, Harrist RB, et al. Diffusion of an effective tobacco prevention program. Part II: evaluation of the adoption phase. Health Educ Res 1995;10:297-307.
56. Nutley S, Davies HTO. Making a reality of evidence-based practice: some lessons from the diffusion of innovations. Public Money Manage 2000;20:35-42.
57. MacDonald M, Green LW. Reconciling concept and context: the dilemma of implementation in school-based health promotion. Health Educ Behav 2001;28:749-68.
58. Parcel GS, Ross JG, Lavin AT, Portnoy B, Nelson GD, Winters F. Enhancing implementation of the teenage health teaching modules. J School Health 1991;61: 35-8.
59. Gottfredson GD. The Hawthorne misunderstanding (and how to get the Hawthorne effect in action research). J Res Crime Delinq 1996;33:28-48.
60. Buston K, Wight D, Hart G, Scott S. Implementation of a teacher-delivered sex education programme: obstacles and facilitating factors. Health Educ Res 2002;17:59-72.
61. Sellers CS, Taylor TJ, Esbensen FA. Reality check. Evaluating a school-based gang prevention model. Eval Rev 1998;22:590-608.
62. Hansen WB, McNeal RB. Drug education practice: results of an observational study. Health Educ Res 1999;14:85-97.
63. Rohrbach LA, Graham JW, Hansen WB. Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: predictors of program implementation. Prev Med 1993;22:237-260.