Towards a classification framework for interoperability of enterprise applications

International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 727-740

  Panetto, H ^a  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN AUTOMATIQUE DE NANCY   (France)

Author keywords

Applications interoperability; Enterprise integration; Integration standards; Maturity models

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DATA ACQUISITION; ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT EXCHANGE; INTEROPERABILITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

APPLICATIONS INTEROPERABILITY; ENTERPRISE INTEGRATION; INTEGRATION STANDARDS; MATURITY MODELS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 35448939107     PISSN: 0951192X     EISSN: 13623052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09511920600996419     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANSI/ISA S95, (2000) Enterprise-control system integration, ANSI/ISA 95.00.01 Part 1: Models and Terminology; ANSI/ISA 95.00.02 Part 2: Object Model Attributesm 2000 (ISA: Raleigh, North Carolina, USA).
2. Baïna, S., Panetto, H, and Morel, G., Holon-oriented b2m process modelling approach for applications interoperability in manufacturing systems environment, Proceedings of the IFAC World Congress, 4-7 July 2005, Prague, Czech Republic.
3. Berio G. et al., D3.1: Requirements analysis: initial core constructs and architecture. UEML TN 1ST 2001 34229, 2002. Available online at: http://www.ueml.org
4. C4ISR Architectures Working Group report, Levels of Information Systems Interoperability (LISI), DoD, February 1998, Washington, DC.
5. Chen, D. and Vernadat, F.B., Enterprise Interoperability: a standardisation view. IFIP International Conference on Enterprise Integration and Modelling Technology (ICEIMT'02), pp. 273-282, 2002 (Kluwer Academics: Valencia, Spain).
6. Clark, T. and Jones, R., Organisational interoperability maturity model for C2. In Proceedings of the Command And Control Research And Technology Symposium (CCRTS), 29 June 1999, 1 July 1999, Newport, RI, USA.
7. Doan, A., Madhavan, J., Dhamankar, R., Domingos, P. and Halevy A., Learning to match ontologies on the Semantic Web. The VLDB Journal The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases Archive, 12/4, pp. 303-319, 2003 (Springer-Verlag: New York).
8. Doumeingts, G., Vallespir, B. and Chen, D., Decision modelling GRAI grid, chapter. In Handbook on architecture for Information Systems, edited by P. Bernus, K. Mertins and G. Schmidt, 1998 (SpringerVerlag: New York).
9. EIF, European Interoperability Framework for pan-European eGovernment Services. Interoperable Delivery of European eGovernment Services to public Administrations, Businesses and Citizens (IDABC), November, Luxembourg, 2004.
10. Euzenat, J., Towards a principled approach to semantic interoperability. CEUR Proceedings of the IJCAI-01 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, USA, 4-5 August 2001, 47, 19-25. Available online at: http://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/Publications/CEUR-WS// Vol-47/
11. IEC 62264, IEC 62264-1:2002. Enterprise-control system integration, Part 1. Models and terminology, 2002 (ISO/IEC: Geneva).
12. IEEE STD 610.12, Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology, 1990 (IEEE: New York).
13. INTEROP NoE, Interoperability Research for Networked Enterprises Applications and Software. Technical annex (restricted) IST FP6 Network of Excellence 1ST 2003-508011, November, 2003. Available online at: http://www.interop-noe.org
14. ISO 14528, Industrial Automation Systems - Concepts and rules for Enterprise Models, TC 184/SC5/WG1, Geneva, Switzerland, 1999.
15. ISO 16100. Manufacturing Software Capability Profiling for interoperability, Part 1: Framework, TC 184/SC5/WG4, Geneva, Switzerland, ICS 25.040.01, 2002.
16. ISO EN DIS 19440, Enterprise integration - Constructs of enterprise modelling, Draft version, TC 184/SC5/WG1, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.
17. Mellor S.J., Kendall S., Uhl A. and Weise D., Model Driven Architecture, 2004 (Addison-Wesley: New York).
18. Morel G., Panetto H., Zaremba M.B. and Mayer F., Manufacturing enterprise control and management system engineering: paradigms and open issues. IFAC Annual Reviews in Control, 2003, 27, 199-209.
19. NATO Allied Data Publication 34 (ADatP-34). NATO C3 Technical Architecture (NC3TA), Version 4.0, 2003.
20. Nguyen, G.T and Vernadat, F., Cooperative information systems in integrated manufacturing environments. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems. Toronto, Canada. May 1994.
21. Noy, N.F. and Musen, M.A., The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Human-Comput. Studies, 2003, 59, 983-1024.
22. OASIS, Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards. ebXML specification, February 2002. Available online at: http://www.oasis-open.org
23. Panetto, H., Berio G., Benali, K., Boudjlida, N. and Petit, M., A unified enterprise modelling language for enhanced interoperability of enterprise models. Proceedings of IFAC INCOM Symposium, Salvador de Bahia, Brazil, 7-9 April 2004.
24. Patwardhan, S., Banerjee S. and Pedersen T., Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. Proceedings of Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: 4th International Conference, CICLing 2003, Mexico City, Mexico, February 16-22, 2003, pp. 241257. LNCS 2588, 2003 (Springer Verlag: New York).
25. Rahm, E. and Bernstein, P. A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. The VLDB Journal, 2001, 10, 334-350.
26. Roddick, J.F., Hornsby, K. and de Vries, D., A unifying semantic distance model for determining the similarity of attribute values. Proceedings of the twenty-sixth ACM Australasian Computer Science Conference on Conference in Research and Practice in Information Technology, Adelaide, Australia, ACM. International Conference Proceedings Series, 2003, Vol. 16, pp. 111-118.
27. Rodriguez, A. and Egenhofer, M., Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Engng. 2003, 15, 442-456.
28. Tolk, A., Beyond technical interoperability - introducing a reference model for measures of merit for coalition interoperability. In Proceedings of the 8th International Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium (ICCRTS), 17-19 June. Washington DC: Command and Control Research Program (CCRP), 2003.
29. UEML. Unified Enterprise Modelling Language (UEML) Thematic Network. IST-2001-34229, 2003. Available online at: http://www. ueml.org
30. UML, Unified modeling language. UML 2.0 Superstructure, v2.0 formal 05/07/04. OMG, 2005.
31. Vernadat, F.B., Enterprise modelling and integration: principles and applications, 1996 (Chapman & Hall: London).
32. W3C, XML Schema Definition Language 1.0, W3C specification, March 2001. Available online at: http://www.w3c.org
33. W3C, Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP) 1.2, W3C specification, February 2003. Available online at: http://www.w3c.org
34. W3C, XML, Extensible Mark-up Language, W3C XML 1.1 recommendation, February 2004a. Available online at: http://www.w3c.org
35. W3C, Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 2.0, W3C specification. August 2004b. Available online at: http://www.w3c.org