메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 132, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 748-751

Point: The ethics of unilateral "do not resuscitate" orders - The role of "informed assent"

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NOTE; RESUSCITATION; TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;

EID: 35448937221     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: 19313543     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0745     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (77)

References (26)
  • 6
    • 0025936815 scopus 로고
    • Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy
    • American Thoracic Society
    • American Thoracic Society. Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Ann Intern Med 1991; 115:478-485
    • (1991) Ann Intern Med , vol.115 , pp. 478-485
  • 7
    • 0000916263 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments
    • The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine
    • The Ethics Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Consensus statement of the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee regarding futile and other possibly inadvisable treatments. Crit Care Med 1997; 25:887-891
    • (1997) Crit Care Med , vol.25 , pp. 887-891
  • 10
    • 0028887929 scopus 로고
    • Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders
    • Curtis JR, Park DR, Krone MR, et al. Use of the medical futility rationale in do-not-attempt-resuscitation orders. JAMA 1995; 273:124-128
    • (1995) JAMA , vol.273 , pp. 124-128
    • Curtis, J.R.1    Park, D.R.2    Krone, M.R.3
  • 13
    • 0036219814 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The medical futility debate: Patient choice, physician obligation, and end-of-life care
    • Burt RA. The medical futility debate: patient choice, physician obligation, and end-of-life care. J Palliat Med 2002; 5:249-254 (Pubitemid 34275021)
    • (2002) Journal of Palliative Medicine , vol.5 , Issue.2 , pp. 249-254
    • Burt, R.A.1
  • 14
    • 0034721254 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The rise and fall of the futility movement
    • DOI 10.1056/NEJM200007273430411
    • Helft PR, Siegler M, Lantos J. The rise and fall of the futility movement. N Engl J Med 2000; 343:293-296 (Pubitemid 30490400)
    • (2000) New England Journal of Medicine , vol.343 , Issue.4 , pp. 293-296
    • Helft, P.R.1    Siegler, M.2    Lantos, J.3
  • 15
    • 33744512630 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit
    • Stapleton RD, Engelberg RA, Wenrich MD, et al. Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2006; 43:1679 -1685
    • (2006) Crit Care Med , vol.43 , pp. 1679-1685
    • Stapleton, R.D.1    Engelberg, R.A.2    Wenrich, M.D.3
  • 19
    • 0025424487 scopus 로고
    • Developments in the law: Medical technology and the law
    • Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F. 2d 772 (D.C.Circuit 1972). D.C. Circuit 1972, ed.103
    • Canterbury v. Spence, 464 F. 2d 772 (D.C.Circuit 1972). Developments in the law: medical technology and the law. In: D.C. Circuit 1972, ed.103. Harvard Law Review, 1990; 1643-1676
    • (1990) Harvard Law Review , pp. 1643-1676
  • 21
    • 0037344210 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The seriously ill hospitalized patient: Preferred role in end-of-life decision making?
    • DOI 10.1053/jcrc.2003.YJCRC2
    • Heyland DK, Tranmer J, O'Callaghan CJ, et al. The seriously ill hospitalized patient: preferred role in end-of-life decision making? J Crit Care 2003; 18:3-10 (Pubitemid 36356511)
    • (2003) Journal of Critical Care , vol.18 , Issue.1 , pp. 3-10
    • Heyland, D.K.1    Tranmer, J.2    O'Callaghan, C.J.3    Gafni, A.4
  • 22
    • 0033540998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Medical futility in end-of-life care: Report of the Council on Ethical and Judical affairs
    • Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs
    • Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Medical futility in end-of-life care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judical affairs. JAMA 1999; 281:937-941
    • (1999) JAMA , vol.281 , pp. 937-941
  • 23
    • 85031186181 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Jones v. Malloy. 412 NW2d 837 (Nebraska Supreme Court 1987)
    • Jones v. Malloy. 412 NW2d 837 (Nebraska Supreme Court 1987)
  • 24
    • 85031181226 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Kovacs v. Freeman. 957 SW2d 251 (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997)
    • Kovacs v. Freeman. 957 SW2d 251 (Kentucky Supreme Court 1997)
  • 25
    • 85031178999 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bornneke v. Rutherford. 89 P3d 40 (Nevada Supreme Court 2004)
    • Bornneke v. Rutherford. 89 P3d 40 (Nevada Supreme Court 2004)
  • 26
    • 84864832249 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Saint Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, Section 118
    • Corpus juris secundum physicians and surgeons. Saint Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 2007; Vol 70, Section 118
    • (2007) Corpus Juris Secundum Physicians and Surgeons , vol.70


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.