Effect of within- and between-talker variability on word identification in noise by younger and older adults

Canadian Acoustics - Acoustique Canadienne

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 108-109

  Goy, Huiwen ^a   Pichora Fuller, Kathy ^a,b   Van Lieshout, Pascal ^a,b,c   Singh, Gurjit ^a,b   Schneider, Bruce ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDIOMETERS; EARPHONES; NOISE ABATEMENT; SOUND REPRODUCTION; THRESHOLD ELEMENTS;

AUDIOMETRIC THRESHOLDS; CONTEXT-SENTENCES; MULTI-TALKER BABBLE; WORD IDENTIFICATION;

SPEECH ANALYSIS;

EID: 35448934404     PISSN: 07116659     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. L. E. Lombard. (1911). Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Ann. Mal. Oreil. Larynx, 37, 101-119.
2. T. Letowski, T. Frank, & J. Caravella. (1993). Acoustical properties of speech produced in noise presented through supraaural earphones. Ear & Hearing, 14, 332-338.
3. J. Junqua. (1993). The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. JASA, 93, 510-524.
4. W. V. Summers, D. B. Pisoni, R. H. Bernacki, R. I. Pedlow & M. A. Stokes. (1988). Effects of noise on speech production: Acoustic and perceptual analyses. JASA, 84, 917-928.
5. M. K. Pichora-Fuller & P. Souza. (2003). Effects of aging on auditory processing of speech. Int. J. Audiol. 42, S11-S16.
6. R. Bilger, J. Nuetzel, W. Rabinowitz & C. Rzeczkowski. (1984). Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise. JSHR, 27, 32-48.
7. P. Boersma and D. Weenik, "Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 4.5.08)" [Computer program], 2006 Apr 4 [cited 2007 Jul 22], Available HTTP: http://www.praat.org/