Functional response: An overview and experimental guide;La respuesta funcional: Una revisión y guía experimental

Ecologia Austral

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 83-93

  Fernández Arhex, Valeria ^a   Corley, Juan C ^a  

^a Inst Nac de Tecnol Agropecuaria   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Behavioural response; Density dependence; Insects; Logistic regression

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; FUNCTIONAL RESPONSE; PARASITOID; PREDATION; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION;

ANIMALIA; HEXAPODA; HYMENOPTERA; IBALIA; IBALIA LEUCOSPOIDES; IBALIIDAE; INSECTA;

EID: 3543136078     PISSN: 03275477     EISSN: 1667782X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. BEGON, M; JL HARPER & CR TOWNSEND. 1995. Ecología: individuos, poblaciones y comunidades. Ed. Omega. Barcelona.
2. BERNSTEIN, C. 2000. Host-parasitoid models: the story of successful failure. Pp. 41-57 en: M Hochberg & A Ives (eds). Population biology of host-parasitoid interactions. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
3. BERRYMAN, AA. 1999. The theoretical foundations of biological control. Pp. 3-21 en: BA Hawkins & HV Cornell (eds). Theoretical approaches to biological control. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
4. BURNETT, T. 1958a. Effect of host distribution on the reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Can. Entomol. 90:179-191.
5. BURNETT, T. 1958b. Effect of area of search on reproduction of Encarsia formosa Gahan (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Can. Entomol. 90:225-229.
6. CASAS, J & B HULLINGER. 1994. Statistical analysis of functional response experiments. Biocontrol Sci. Techn. 4:133-145.
7. CHEKE, RA. 1974. Experiments on the effect of host spatial distribution on the numerical response of parsitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 43:107-114.
8. CHESSON, P & M ROSENZWEIG. 1991. Behaviour, heterogeneity, and the dynamics of interacting species. Ecology 72:1187-1195.
9. COLLINS, MD; SA WARD & AFG DIXON. 1981. Handling time and the functional response of Aphelinus thomsoni, a predator and parasite of the aphid Drepanosiphum platanoidis. J. Anim. Ecol. 50:479-487.
10. COOK, RM & SF HUBBARD. 1977. Adaptative searching strategies in insect parasites. J. Anim. Ecol. 46:115-125.
11. FERNÁNDEZ-ARHEX, V & JC CORLEY. 2003. The functional response of parasitoids and its implications for biological control. Biocontrol Sci. Techn. 13:403-413.
12. GETZ, WM & NJ MILLS. 1997. Host-parasitoid coexistence and egg-limited encounter rates. Am. Nat. 148:333-347.
13. GRIFFITHS, KJ. 1969. The importance of coincidence in the functional and numerical responses of two parasites of the European pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer. Can. Entomol. 101:673-713.
14. GULLAN, PJ & PS CRANSTON. 2000. The insects: an outline of Entomology, 2da edn. Blackwell Science. Carleton.
15. HASSELL, MP. 1978. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
16. HASSELL, MP. 2000. The spatial and temporal dynamics of host-parasitoid interactions. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
17. HASSELL, MP; JH LAWTON & JR BEDDINGTON. 1977. Sigmoid functional responses by invertebrate predators and parasitoids. J. Anim. Ecol. 46:249-262.
18. HASSELL, MP & RM MAY. 1973. Stability in host-parasite models. J. Anim. Ecol. 42:693-726.
19. HASSELL, MP & RM MAY. 1974. Aggregation in predators and insect parasites and its effect on stability. J. Anim. Ecol. 43:567-594.
20. HERTLEIN, MB & K THORARINSSON. 1987. Variable patch times and the functional response of Leptopilina boulardi (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae). Environ. Entomol. 16:593-598.
21. HOLLING, CS. 1959. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91:385-398.
22. HOLLING, CS. 1965. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 45:3-60.
23. HOLLING, CS. 1966. The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 48:1-86.
24. HOUCK, MA & RE STRAUSS. 1985. The comparative study of functional responses: experimental design and statistical interpretation. Can. Entomol. 117:617-629.
25. IVLEV, VS. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University Press. New Haven.
26. JULIANO, S.A. 1993. Nonlinear curve fitting: predation and functional response curves. Pp. 159-182 en: SM Scheiner & J Gurevitch (eds). Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Chapman & Hall, Nueva York.
27. JULIANO, SA & FM WILLIAMS. 1987. A comparison of methods for estimating the functional response parameters of the random predator equation. J. Anim. Ecol. 56:641-653.
28. VAN LENTEREN, JC & K BAKKER. 1976. Functional responses in invertebrates. Neth. J. Zool. 26:567-572.
29. VAN LENTEREN, JC & K BAKKER. 1978. Behavioural aspects of the functional responses of a parasite (Pseudeucoila bochei Weld) to its host (Drosophila melanogaster). Neth. J. Zool. 28:213-233.
30. LIVDHAL, TP. 1979. Evolution and handling time: the functional response of a predator to the density of sympatric and allopatric strains of prey. Evolution 33:765-768.
31. LIVDHAL, TP & AE STIVEN. 1983. Statistical difficulties in the analysis of predator functional response data. Can. Entomol. 115:1365-1370.
32. MADDEN, JL, & D PIMENTEL. 1965. Density and spatial relationships between a wasp parasite and its housefly host. Can. Entomol. 97:1031-1037.
33. MANLY, BFJ & CD JAMIENSON. 1999. Functional response and parallel curve analysis. Oikos 85:523-528.
34. MORRISON, G. 1986. "Searching time aggregation" and density dependent parasitism in a laboratory host-parasitoid interaction. Oecologia 68:298-303.
35. MURDOCH, WW & A OATEN. 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9:1-131.
36. NICHOLSON, AJ & VA BAILEY. 1935. The balance of animal populations. Part 1. P. Zool. Soc. Lond. 3:551-598.
37. OATEN, A. 1977. Optimal foraging in patches: a case for stochasticity. Theor. Popul. Biol. 12:263-285.
38. OATEN, A & WW MURDOCH. 1975. Functional response and stability in predator-prey systems. Am. Nat. 109:289-298.
39. O'NEIL, RJ. 1989.Comparison of laboratory and field measurements of the functional response of Podisus maculaventris (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). J. Kansas Entomol. Soc. 62:148-155.
40. ROGERS, D. 1972. Random search and insect population models. J. Anim. Ecol. 41:369-383.
41. ROYAMA, T. 1971. A comparative study of models for predation and parasitism. Res. Popul. Ecol. 1:1-91.
42. SAS INSTITUTE INC. 1999. SAS® system for Microsoft® Windows®, v. 8.0 (TSMO). SAS Institue Inc. Cary.
43. SOLOMON, JE. 1949. The natural control of animal populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 18:1-35.
44. THOMPSON, DJ. 1975. Towards a predator-prey model incorporating age structure: effects of predator and prey size on the predation of Daphnia magna by Ischnura elegans. J. Anim. Ecol. 44:907-916.
45. THOMPSON, WR. 1930. The utility of mathematical methods in relation to work on biological control. Ann. Appl. Biol. 17:641-648.
46. TREXLER, JC; CE MCCULLOGH & J TRAVIS. 1988. How can the functional response best be determined? Oecologia 76:206-214.
47. WALDE, SJ & WW MURDOCH. 1988. Spatial density dependence in parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 33:441-446.
48. WILLIAMS, FM & SA JULIANO. 1985. Further difficulties in the analysis of functional response experiments and a resolution. Can. Entomol. 117:631-640.