Environmental impact assessment in Turkey: Capacity building for European Union accession

Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 141-151

  Innanen, Sally E R ^a  

^a ROYAL HASKONINGDHV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Capacity building; EIA; EU accession; EU legislation; SEA; Turkey

Indexed keywords

CAPACITY BUILDING; DECENTRALIZATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; EUROPEAN UNION;

EURASIA; TURKEY;

AVES; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO;

EID: 3543117317     PISSN: 14615517     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154604781765987     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Ahmad, B., and Wood, C., 2002. “A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia”. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22:213–234.
2. Cherp, A., 2001. “Environmental assessment in countries in transition:evolution in a changing context”. Journal of Environmental Management, 62:357–374.
3. Cherp, A., 1999. Environmental Assessment in Countries in Transition, PhD thesis Manchester:University of Manchester, Faculty of Arts.
4. Cherp, Aleg, and Antypas, Alexios. 2003. “Dealing with continuous reform:towards adaptive EA policy systems in countries in transition”. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 5 (4):455–476.
5. EC, European Commission. 2001a. “Guidance on EIA:EIS review”, Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
6. EC, European Commission. 2001b. “Guidance on EIA:scooping”, Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
7. EC, European Commission. 2001c. “Guidance on EIA:screening”, Luxembourg:Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
8. EC, European Commission. 2001. “Turkish National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis”, Ankara, Turkey:Secretariat General for EU Affairs.
9. George, C., 2000. “Comparative review of environmental procedures and practice”. In Environmental Assessment in Developing and Transitional Countries, Edited by:Lee, N., and George, C., Chichester:John Wiley and Sons.
10. Lee, N., Colley, R., Bonde, J., and Simpson, J., 1999. “Reviewing the quality of environmental standards and environmental appraisals”, Department of Planning and Landscape, University of Manchester. Occasional paper no 55
11. METAP, Mediterranean Environmental Technical Assistance Programme and Manchester University. 2001. Evaluation and Future Development of the EIA system in Turkey report prepared under the METAP EIA Institutional Strengthening Project
12. Official Gazette. 1993. “Environmental impact assessment regulation”. Turkish Official Gazette, 21489 7 February
13. Official Gazette. 1997. “Environmental impact assessment regulation”. Turkish Official Gazette, 23028 23 June
14. Official Gazette. 2002. “Environmental impact assessment regulation”. Turkish Official Gazette, 24777 6 June
15. Official Gazette. 2003. “Environmental impact assessment regulation”. Turkish Official Gazette, 25318 16 December
16. Senter International. 2001. “Terms of reference for the project ‘Approximation and implementation of the EIA Directive in Turkey’”, The Netherlands:Senter International/Ministry of Economic Affairs.
17. Yilmaz, H., Albayrak, A., Ataman, S., Beba, A., and Innanen, S., 2002. “The EIA process in Turkey” paper presented to IAIA Congress 2002
18. Wood, Christopher, Barker, Adam, Jones, Carys, and Hughes, Johanna. 1996. “Evaluation of the performance of the EIA process. Final report”, Manchester:University of Manchester. Report to Contract B4–3040/95/451/ MAR/B2
19. World Bank. 1999. The World Bank's Study of Environmental Assessment systems of 28 Countries of Europe and Central Asia, Washington, D.C.:World Bank.
20. World Bank. 2002. “Environmental impact assessment systems in Europe and Central Asia Countries”, Washington, D.C.:Europe and Central Asia Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development Department.
21. World Bank. 2003. “Turkey corporate sector impact assessment report”, Private and Financial sector Development, Europe and Central Asia Region. Report no 23153-TU