Forest health, collective behaviors, and management

Environmental Management

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 620-636

  Kijtewachakul, Nitaya ^a   Shivakoti, Ganesh P ^a   Webb, Edward L ^a  

^a ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Collective behaviors; Community based forest management; Forest health; Natural regeneration; Shifting cultivation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SOCIAL ASPECTS; TIMBER; WATERSHEDS; WOOD PRODUCTS;

COLLECTIVE BEHAVIORS; COMMUNITY-BASED FOREST MANAGEMENT (CBFM); FOREST HEALTH;

FORESTRY;

COMMUNITY FORESTRY; FOREST HEALTH; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY PRODUCTION;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM REGENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FOREST; FORESTRY; PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIAL CLASS; THAILAND; WATERSHED; WOOD;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; FORESTS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TREES; WATER; WOOD PRODUCTS;

ASIA; EURASIA; NAN; NORTHERN REGION [THAILAND]; SOUTHEAST ASIA; THAILAND;

EID: 3543113869     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-3024-z     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Allin, C. W. 1990. Congress or the agencies: Who'll rule wilderness in the century? Pages 19-29 in P. C. Reed (compiler), Preparing to manage wilderness in the 21st century: Proceedings of the conference. State Botanical Gardens, Athens, Georgia. General Technical Report; no. SE-66, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
2. Apichatvullop, Y. 1993. Local participation in social forest. Regional Development Dialogue 14:34-42.
3. Blockhus, J., A. Ingles, D. Gilmour, and A. Mittelman. 1997. Supporting income generation from community? forests: Some policy and practical considerations. Pages 15-30 in M. Victor (ed.), Income generation through community forestry. Proceedings of an international seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand, 18-20 October 1996. RECOFTC Report 13, Bangkok, Thailand.
4. Chamarik, S., and Y. Santasombat. 1993. Community forestry in Thailand: Directions for development (Vol. 1). Local Development Institute, Bangkok [in Thai].
5. Community Forest Section. 1994. Guideline for community forest development project. Royal Forest Department (RFD), Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok, Thailand, 38 pp.
6. Duaglamyai, P. 2001. Centralized power and lack of participation: political problems in forest and land management. Pages 2-30 in A. Rakyutitum (ed.), Forest land/watershed resource management through people participation. Proceeding in the seminar of administrative and management of natural resources in watershed areas through people participation. B.S.D. Publisher: Chinag Mai, Thailand [in Thai].
7. Ekachai, S. 1997. Forests clearly deserve better. Bangkok Post, 28 May. Bangkok, Thailand.
8. Ekachai, S. 2000. Tribal trusts. Bangkok Post, 19 December. Bangkok, Thailand.
9. Ganjanapan, A. 1992. Community forestry in Northern Thailand: Learning from local practices. Pages 93-88 in H. Wood, and W. H. H, Mellink. (eds.), Sustainable and effective management systems for community forestry: Proceedings of a workshop held in Bangkok, Thailand, 15-17 January 1992. The Regional Community Forestry Training Center (RECOFTC), Bangkok, Thailand.
10. Ganjanapan, A. 1998. The politics of conservation and the complexity of local control of forests in the northern Thai highlands. Mountain Research and Development 18:71-82.
11. Ganjanapan, A. 2000. Local control of land and forest: Cultural dimensions of resource management in Northern Thailand. Regional Center for Social Science and Sustainable Development (RCSD), Faculty of Social Science, Chiang Mai University, Thailand 235.
12. Ganjanapan, A., and M. Kaosa-ard, 1995. Evolution of land pioneering for agriculture: A case study of the upper northern region, Research Monograph No. 13. Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI), Thailand, [in Thai] 167.
13. Ganjanapan, A., and S. Ganjanapan. 1991. The cases of community forestry in the north. Social Research Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
14. Gilmour, D. A. 1995. Conservation and development: Seeking the linkages. Pages 7-20 in H. Wood, M. McDaniel, and K. Warner. (eds.), Community development and conservation of forest biodiversity through community forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar held in Bangkok, Thailand, 26-28 October 1994. RECOFTC report 12, Bangkok, Thailand.
15. Gilmour, D. A., and R. J. Fisher. 1998. Evolution in community forestry: Contesting forest resources. Pages 27-44 in Victor M, C. Lang, and J. Bornemeier. (eds.), Community forestry at a crossroads: Reflections and future directions in the development of community forestry. Proceedings of an International Seminar, held in Bangkok, Thailand, 17-19 July 1998. RECOFTC report no. 16, Bangkok, Thailand.
16. Habeak, J. R. 1968. Forest succession in the Glacier Park Cedar-Hemlock Forests. Ecology 49:872-880.
17. Hirsch, P. 1997a. Seeing forests for trees. Pages 1-14 in P. Hirsch (ed.), Seeing forests for trees: Environment and environmentalism in Thailand. Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
18. Hirsch, P. 1997b. Environment and environmentalism in Thailand: Material and ideological bases. Pages 15-36 in P. Hirsch (ed.), Seeing Forests for Trees: Environment and Environmentalism in Thailand. Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
19. Hurbert, S. H. 1971. The non-concept of species diversity: A critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577-586.
20. Kent, M., and P. Coker. 1992. Vegetation description and analysis: A practical approach. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK 363.
21. Ludwig, J. A., and J. F. Reynolds. 1988. Statistical ecology: A primer on methods and computing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York 377.
22. Makarabhirom, P. 1999. How to consider the appropriate of the Community Forest Act. [in Thai]. Forest and Community Newsletter 6:38-39.
23. Narintarangkul Na Ayuthaya, P. 1996. Community forestry and watershed networks in northern Thailand. Pages 116-146 in P. Hirsch (ed.), Seeing forests for trees: Environment and environmentalism in Thailand. Silkworm Books, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
24. Noikorn, P. 2000. Villagers make big fails to settle dispute. Bangkok Post 29 February, Bangkok, Thailand.
25. Noss, R. F. 1990. What can wilderness do for biodiversity? Pages 49-61 in P. C. Reed (compiler), Preparing to manage wilderness in the 21st century: Proceedings of the conference. State Botanical Gardens, Athens, Georgia. General Technical Report; no. SE-66, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.
26. Ostrom, E. 1999. International Forestry Resources and Institutions (IFRI) Research Program: Field Manual. Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.
27. Peet, R. K. 1978. Forest vegetation of the Colorado front range: patterns of species diversity. Vegetation 37:65-78.
28. Poffenberger, M., and B. McGean. 1993. Upland Philippine communities: Guardians of the final forest frontiers. University of California, Center for Southeast Asia Studies, Berkeley 66.
29. Pragtong, K. 1993. Social forestry in Thailand: Policy evolution and institutional arrangements. Regional Development Dialogue 14:59-69.
30. Punthasain, A. 1999. How to restore forest and green areas. Thammasart University Publishing, Bangkok, Thailand, [in Thai] 180.
31. Punthasain, A. 2002. The sustainable directions of Thai society and community forests: Economics perspectives. Pages 55-69 in S. Wankaew (ed.), The sustainable directions of Thai society and community forests: interdisciplinary perspectives. Center for Social Development Studies (CSDS), Faculty of Political Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand [in Thai].
32. Ramitanondh, S. 1989. Forests and deforestation in Thailand: A pandisciplinary approach. culture and environment in Thailand. Pages 23-50 in a symposium of the Siam Society. The Siam Society under Royal Patronage, Bangkok.
33. Samabuddhi, K. 2002. Senators add crucial clause before giving passage to bill. Bangkok Post 16 March, Bangkok, Thailand.
34. Soulé, M., and K. A. Kohm (eds). 1989. Research priorities for conservation biology. Published in cooperation with the Society for Conservation Biology. Island Press Critical Issue Series #1, Washington D.C., pp. 97.
35. Sukrung, K. 1997. The fight for the forests. Bangkok Post 19 June, Bangkok, Thailand.
36. Sukwong, S. 2002. Theories of biodiversity and forest resource management. [in Thai]. Forest and Community Newsletter 9:18-29.
37. Tan-Kim-Yong, U. 1993. Participation land-use planning as a sociological methodology for natural resource management. Regional Development Dialogue 14:70-83.
38. Wittayapak, C. 2002. Community as a political space for struggles over access to natural resources and cultural meaning. Pages 275-297 in P. Dearden (ed.), Environmental protection and rural development in Thailand: Challenges and opportunities. White Lotus Press, Thailand.
39. Wittayapak, C., and P. Dearden. 1999. Decision-making arrangements in community-based watershed management in Northern Thailand. Society and Natural Resources 12:673-691.