Software quality - Prevention versus cure?

Software Quality Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 197-210

  Dromey, R Geoff ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Acceptance testing; Component based quality; Defect prevention; Product quality models; Quality carrying properties; Software defects; Software inspection

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; PRODUCT DESIGN; QUALITY CONTROL;

ACCEPTANCE TESTING; COMPONENT-BASED QUALITY; DEFECT PREVENTION; PRODUCT QUALITY MODELS; QUALITY-CARRYING PROPERTIES; SOFTWARE DEFECTS; SOFTWARE INSPECTIONS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 3543110266     PISSN: 09639314     EISSN: 15731367     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025162610079     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Boehm, B. and In, H. 1996. Identifying quality requirement conflicts, IEEE Software 13(2): 25-36.
2. Crawford, A. 2003. Ph.D. Thesis (in preparation), Software Quality Institute, Griffith University, unpublished results.
3. Dromey, R.G. 1995. A model for software product quality, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (February): 146-162.
4. Dromey, R.G. 1996. Cornering the chimera, IEEE Software 13(1): 33-43.
5. Dromey, R.G. 1998. Software product quality: Theory, model, practice, see publications at http://www.sqi.gu. edu.au.
6. Hoare, C.A.R. 1969. An axiomatic basis for computer programming, Communications of ACM 12(10): 576-583.
7. Horowitz, E. 1998. WaiWin Reference Manual, A System for Collaboration and Negotiation, Technical Report, University of Southern California (see also http://sunset.usc.edu/classes/cs577a_99/EP.html).
8. Lauesen, S. and Younessi, H. 1998. Is software quality visible in code, IEEE Software 15(4): 69-73.
9. Leveson, N.G. 1995. Software: System Safety and Computers. Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
10. McDermid, J. 1999. Private communication.
11. Pfleeger, S.L., Fenton, N., and Page, S. 1994, Evaluating software engineering standards, Computer (September): 71-79.