Momentum conservation implies anomalous energy transport in ID classical lattices

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 84, Issue 13, 2000, Pages

  Prosen, Tomaž ^a,b   Campbell, David K ^a,c  

^a CENTER FOR NONLINEAR STUDIES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

^c University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENERGY TRANSPORT; FOURIER LAW; LATTICE HAMILTONIANS; MOMENTUM CONSERVATION;

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CORRELATION THEORY; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; HAMILTONIANS; HARMONIC ANALYSIS; LINEARIZATION; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; THERMOANALYSIS;

CRYSTAL LATTICES;

EID: 3543092894     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2857     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. E. Fermi, J. Pasta, and S. Ulam, Los Alamos Report No. LA-1940 (1955); reprinted in E. Fermi, Collected Papers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965), Vol. II, p. 978.
2. E. Fermi, J. Pasta, and S. Ulam, Los Alamos Report No. LA-1940 (1955); reprinted in E. Fermi, Collected Papers (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965), Vol. II, p. 978.
3. R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957); R. Kubo, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W. Brittin (Interscience, New York, 1959), Vol. 1, p. 120.
4. R. Kubo, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570 (1957); R. Kubo, in Lectures in Theoretical Physics, edited by W. Brittin (Interscience, New York, 1959), Vol. 1, p. 120.
5. M. Toda, Phys. Rep. 18, 1 (1975).
6. W.M. Visscher, Methods Comput. Phys. 15, 371 (1976).
7. R.A. MacDonald and D.H. Tsai, Phys. Rep. 46, 1 (1978).
8. E.A. Jackson, Rocky Mt. J. Math. 8, 127 (1978).
9. M. Toda, Phys. Scr. 20, 424 (1979).
10. J. Ford, Phys. Rep. 213, 271 (1992).
11. Z. Rieder, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. Lieb, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 8, 1073 (1967).
12. M. Toda, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 22, 431 (1967).
13. L ∼ exp(const × L).
14. H. Kaburaki and M. Machida, Phys. Lett. A 181, 85 (1993).
15. S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1896 (1997).
16. E.A. Jackson and A.D. Mistriotis, J. Phys. C 1, 1223 (1989).
17. T. Hatano, Phys. Rev. E 59, R1 (1999).
18. B. Hu, B.-W. Li, and H. Zhao, Phys. Rev. E 57, 2992 (1998).
19. G. Casati, J. Ford, F. Vivaldi, and W.M. Visscher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1861 (1984).
20. T. Prosen and M. Robnik, J. Phys. A 25, 3449 (1992).
21. D. Alonso, R. Artuso, G. Casati, and I. Guarneri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1859 (1999).
22. S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, Physica (Amsterdam) 119D, 140 (1998).
23. S. Lepri, R. Livi, and A. Politi, cond-mat/9806133.
24. The validity of the linear response theory that underlies the Kubo formula is not an issue here, since we will be making analytic estimates that are valid for arbitrarily small temperature differences and since we take care to isolate the pathological cases of zero internal thermal gradients.
25. P. Mazur, Physica 43, 533 (1969).
26. G. Casati, Found. Phys. 16, 51 (1986).
27. T. Prosen and D. K. Campbell (to be published).
28. A. G. Izergin and V. E. Korepin, Vestn. Leningr. Gos. Univ., Fiz. Khim. 22, 88 (1981).