Implementing river water quality modelling issues in mesoscale watershed models for water policy demands - An overview on current concepts, deficits, and future tasks

Physics and Chemistry of the Earth

Volumn 29, Issue 11-12 SPEC. ISS., 2004, Pages 725-737

  Horn, Andreas L ^a   Rueda, Francisco J ^b   Hörmann, Georg ^a   Fohrer, Nicola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Habitat simulation; River assessment; TMDL; Water framework directive; Water quality; Watershed models

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; OCEAN HABITATS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; RIVERS; WATERSHEDS;

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICIES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; POLITICAL AWARENESS;

WATER QUALITY;

POLICY APPROACH; RIVER WATER; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

DATA BASES; OCEANS; POLLUTION CONTROL; RIVERS; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 3543088590     PISSN: 14747065     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2004.05.001     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Al-Khudhairy, D.H.A., Leemhuis, C., Hoffmann, V., Shepherd, I.M., Thompson, J.R., Gavin, H., Gasca-Tucker, D., Zalidis, G., Bilas, G., Sørensen, H.R., Refsgaard, A., Papadimos, D., Argentieri, A., 2001. SHYLOC Final Report. EUR 19755 EN, European Communities. p. 342
2. Anderson, J.R., 1993. State of the Rivers Project, Report 1. Development and Validation of the Methodology. Department of Primary Industries, Queensland, Australia
3. Arnold J.G. Srinivasan R. Muttiah R.S. Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment, Part I. Model development Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34 1 1998 73-89
4. ATV (German Association for Water, Wastewater and Waste), 1996. Allgemein verfügbares Gewässergütemodell. Projektabschlussbericht 02 WA9104/4. ATV, Hennef, Germany. p. 51
5. Baffaut, C., Arnold, J.R., Schumacher, J.S., 2003. Fecal coliform fate and transport simulation with SWAT. Condensed papers of the 2nd International SWAT Conference, Bari, Italy. pp. 10-13
6. Bain, M., Loucks, D.P., 1999. Linking hydrology and ecology in simulations for impact assessments. In: Proceedings of the 26th Water Resources Planning and Management Conference. American Society of Civil Engineers, Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Available from: http://www.cfe.cornell.edu/research/urbanwater/ project%20description/IRAS%20specific/MBB-DPL.htm (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.cfe.cornell.edu/research/urbanwater/ project%20description/IRAS%20specific/MBB-DPL.htm http://www.cfe.cornell.edu/research/urbanwater/project%20description/ IRAS%20specific/MBB-DPL.htm
7. Barbour, M.T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B.D., Stribling, J.B., 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, 2nd Ed. Report EPA 841-B-99-002. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA. p. 339
8. BAW (German Federal Waterways Engineering and Research Institute), 1998. TRIM-2D Standard Validation Document, Version 2.0. BAW, Hamburg, Germany. p. 65
9. Beasley D.B. Huggins L.F. Monke E.J. ANSWERS: A model for watershed planning Transactions of the ASAE 23 4 1980 938-944
10. Beven K.J. Rainfall-Runoff Modelling: The Primer 2000 Wiley Chichester, UK p. 360
11. Bicknell, B.R., Imhoff, J.C., Kittle Jr., J.L., Jobes, T.H., Donigian Jr., A.S., 2001. Hydrological Simulation Program--FORTRAN, HSPF, Version 12. User's manual. AQUA TERRA Consultants, Mountain View, California, USA. p. 873
12. Boon P.J. Holmes N.T.H. Maitland P.S. Rowell T.A. Davies J. A system for evaluating rivers for conservation (SERCON): Development, structure and function Boon P.J. Howell D.L. Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? 1997 299-326 The Stationery Office Edinburgh, UK
13. Bouraoui F. Dillaha T.A. ANSWERS-2000: Non-point-source nutrient planning model Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE 126 11 2000 1045-1055
14. Brierley, G., Fryirs, K., Cohen, T., 1996. Development of a generic geomorphic framework to assess catchment character, Part 1. A geomorphic approach to catchment characterisation. Working Paper 9603. Graduate School of the Environment, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
15. Brown, L.C., Barnwell, T.O., 1987. The enhanced stream water quality models QUAL2E and QUAL2E-UNCAS: Documentation and user manual. Report EPA/600/3-87/007. US EPA, Athens, Georgia, USA. p. 189
16. BYU-EMRL (Brigham Young University--Environmental Modeling Research Laboratory), 2002. SMS--Surface Water Modeling System, Tutorials, Version 8.0. Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA. p. 360
17. Cerco, C.F., Cole, T., 1995. User's guide to the CE-QUAL-ICM three-dimensional eutrophication model, Release Version 1.0. Technical Report EL-95-15. US Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA. p. 320
18. Chapra S.C. Surface Water-Quality Modeling 1997 McGraw-Hill New York, USA p. 844
19. Cheng R.T. Casulli V. Gartner J.W. Tidal, Residual, Intertidal Mudflat (TRIM) model and its applications to San Francisco Bay, California Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 36 1993 235-280
20. Chun K.C. Chang R.-W. Williams G.P. Chang Y.-S. Tomasko D. LaGory K. Ditmars J. Chun H.-D. Lee B.-K. Water quality issues in the Nakdong River Basin in the Republic of Korea Environmental Engineering and Policy 2 2001 131-143
21. Cole, T.M., 2002. CE-QUAL-W2, A 2D hydrodynamic and water quality model for rivers, lakes, reservoirs, and estuaries. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Reservoir Limnology and Water Quality, ResLim 2002. České Budějovice, Czech Republic. pp. 71-74
22. Cole, T.M., Wells, S.A., 2003. CE-QUAL-W2: A two-dimensional, laterally averaged, hydrodynamic and water quality model, Version 3.1. Instruction Report EL-03-1. US Army Engineering and Research Development Center, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA. p. 619
23. Cooper J.A.G. Ramm A.E.L. Harrison T.D. The Estuarine Health Index: A new approach to scientific information transfer Ocean - Coastal Management 25 1994 103-141
24. Copp, R.S., von Christierson, B., Nath, A., 2002. Simulation of surface and ground water responses for the restoration of the Southern Golden Gate Estates Wetlands. In: Proceedings of the 1st North American DHI Software Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA. Available from: http://www.dhisoftware.com/Orlando2002/ Proceedings/Tracks/Watersourcesack.htm (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.dhisoftware.com/Orlando2002/Proceedings/ Tracks/Watersourcesack.htm
25. Cox B.A. A review of currently available in-stream water-quality models and their applicability for simulating dissolved oxygen in lowland rivers The Science of the Total Environment 314-316 2003 335-377
26. Crawford, N.H., Linsley, R.K., 1966. Digital simulation in hydrology: Stanford watershed model IV. Technical Report No. 39. Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. p. 210
27. CWA (Clean Water Act), 1972. Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 USC. §§. 1251-1387
28. Davies N.M. Norris R.H. Thoms M.C. Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large-scale catchment characteristics Freshwater Biology 45 2000 343-369
29. Desmond, E., Ward, A.D., 1998. ADAPT: Agricultural Drainage and Pesticide Transport, User Manual, Version 4.2. Department of Agricultural Engineering, The Ohio State University, Colombus, Ohio, USA. p. 101
30. DHI Water - Environment, 2000. MIKE 11, A modelling system for rivers and channels. User Guide. DHI Water - Environment, Hørsholm, Denmark, p. 384
31. Dillaha, T.A., Wolfe, M.L., Shirmohammadi, A., Byne, F.W., 2001. ANSWERS-2000. In: Parsons, J.E., Thomas, D.L., Huffman, R.L. (Eds.), Agricultural non-point source water quality models: Their use and application. Southern Cooperative Series Bulletin 398, Southern Association of Agricultural Experiment Station Directors, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA. pp. 28-44
32. Di Luzio M. Srinivasan R. Arnold J.G. Integration of watershed tools and SWAT model into BASINS Journal of the American Water Resource Association 38 4 2002 1127-1141
33. DIN (German Institute for Standardization), 1990. DIN 38410-2: German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge; biological-ecological analysis of water (group M); determination of the saprobic index (M 2). Beuth, Berlin, Germany, p. 18
34. Di Toro D.M. Fitzpatrick J.J. Thomann R.V. Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) and Model Verification Program (MVP)--Documentation 1983 Hydroscience, Inc. Westwood, New York, USA
35. Donigian Jr., A.S., 1996. Bibliography for HSPF and related references. Available from: http://www.soe.uoguelph.ca/webfiles/wjames/homepage/ Research/hspfrefs.html (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.soe.uoguelph.ca/webfiles/wjames/homepage/Research/ hspfrefs.html
36. Donigian Jr., A.S., 2003. Bibliography for HSPF and related references. Available from: http://www.aquaterra.com/hspfbib.html (date of access: 10 Feb 2004) http://www.aquaterra.com/hspfbib.html
37. Donigian Jr., A.S., Imhoff, J.C., 2002. From the Stanford model to BASINS: 40 years of watershed modeling. ASCE Task Committee on Evolution of Hydrologic Methods Through Computers. ASCE 150th Anniversary Celebration. November 3-7, 2002. Washington, DC, USA. Available from: http://www.aquaterra.com/STANFORDSINS.doc (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.aquaterra.com/ STANFORDSINS.doc
38. El-Kaddah D. Carey A.E. Water quality modeling of the Cahaba River, Alabama Environmental Geology 45 2003 323-338
39. EU (European Union), 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327/1, 22.12.2000
40. EUROHARP 2003. EUROHARP project description. Available from: http://www.euroharp.org/pd/pd/index.htm (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.euroharp.org/pd/pd/index.htm
41. Flowers, J.D., Hauck, L.M., Kiesling, R.L., 2001. Water quality modeling of Lake Waco using CE-QUAL-W2 for assessment of phosphorus control strategies. USDA Lake Waco-Bosque River Initiative. Texas Institute for Applied Environmental Research, Stephenville, Texas, USA. 76
42. Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., de Marsily, G., Bidoglio, G., 2003. Validation of a statistical model of source apportionment of riverine nitrogen loads by the physical model SWAT. Condensed papers of the 2nd International SWAT Conference, Bari, Italy. pp. 70-73
43. Hafnø K. Madsen M.N. Dørge J. MIKE11 - a generalized river modelling package Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995 733-782 Water Resources Publications Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA
44. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Takashi, M., van Loosdrecht, M., 2000. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2D and ASM3. Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. IWA Publishing, London, UK. p. 121
45. Huggins, L.F., Monke, E.J., 1966. The mathematical solution of the hydrology of small watersheds. Technical Report No. 1. Water Resources Research Center, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
46. Ivanov, P., Masliev, I., Kularathna, M., De Marchi, C., Somlyódy, L., 1996. DESERT - Decision Support System for Evaluating River Basin Strategies, User's Manual. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, p. 162
47. Jacobsen, T.V., 1999. Caloosahatchee Basin integrated surface water - ground water model. Final report to the South Florida Water Management District. Project No. 50155. West Palm Beach, Florida, USA. p. 107
48. Johanson, R.C., Imhoff, J.C., Davis Jr., H.H., 1980. User's manual for Hydrological Simulation Program - FORTRAN (HSPF). Research Grant No. R804971-01. Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency. Athens, Georgia, USA. p. 684
49. King K.W. Balogh J.C. Water quality impacts associated with converting farmland and forests to turfgrass Transactions of the ASAE 44 3 2001 569-576
50. Kirchesch V. Schöl A. Das Gewässergütemodell QSIM - Ein Instrument zur Simulation und Prognose des Stoffhaushalts und der Planktondynamik von Fließgewässern Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung 43 6 1999 302-309
51. Krysanova V. Müller-Wohlfeil D.-I. Becker A. Development and test of a spatially distributed hydrological/water quality model for mesoscale watersheds Ecological Modelling 160 1998 261-289
52. Ladson, A.R., 2000. A multi-component indicator of stream condition for waterway managers, Balancing scientific rigour with the need for utility. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, p. 338
53. Leavesley, G.H., Restrepo, P.J., Markstrom, S.L., Dixon, M., Stannard, L.G., 1996. The Modular Modeling System--MMS: User's Manual: US Geological Survey Open File Report 96-151. US Geological Survey and University of Colorado, Center for Advanced Decision Support for Water and Environmental Systems, Denver, Colorado, USA. p. 182
54. Leavesley G.H. Stannard L.G. The precipitation-runoff modelling system - PRMS Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995 281-310 Water Resources Publications Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA
55. Martin, J.L., 1987. Application of a two-dimensional model of hydrodynamics and water quality CE-QUAL-W2 to DeGray Lake, Arkansas. Technical Report E-87-1. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA
56. Martin J.L. McCutcheon S.C. Schottman R.W. Hydrodynamics and Transport for Water Quality Modeling 1999 Lewis Publ. Boca Raton, USA p. 794
57. Martin, J.L., Kennedy, R.H., 2000. Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs): A Perspective. Report No. ERDC/TN EEDP-01-46. US Army Engineer Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi, USA. p. 20
58. McKinnie, W., Hendricks, G., 2001. ADAPT (Agricultural Drainage and Pesticide Transport), A brief description. Simulation of Agricultural Watershed Systems, Paper 1. Agricultural and Biological Engineering Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA. p. 23
59. Orth D.J. Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow-habitat models Regulated Rivers 1 1987 171-181
60. Parsons, M., Thoms, M., Norris, R., 2002. Australian River Assessment System: Review of physical river assessment methods--a biological perspective. Monitoring River Health Initiative Technical Report No. 21. Commonwealth of Australia and University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia. p. 65
61. Petersen R.C. The RCE: A riparian channel and environmental inventory for small streams in the agricultural landscape Freshwater Biology 27 1992 295-306
62. Plafkin, J.L., Barbour, M.T., Porter, K.D., Gross, S.K., Hughes, R.M., 1989. Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for use in streams and rivers: Benthic macroinvertebrates and fish. Report EPA 440-4-89-001. US EPA, Office of Water Regulations and Standards, Washington, DC, USA. p. 194
63. Ramanarayanan, T.S., Srinivasan, R., Arnold, J.G., 1996. Modelling Wister Lake Watershed using a GIS-linked basin scale hydrologic/water quality model. In: Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating Geographic Information Systems and Environmental Modelling, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. Available from: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/ conf/SANTA-ROM/program.html (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/SANTA-ROM/program.html
64. Rauch W. Henze M. Koncsos L. Reichert P. Shanahan P. Somlyódy L. Vanrolleghem P. River water quality modelling: I. State of the art Water Science and Technology 38 11 1998 237-244
65. Raven P.J. Fox P. Everard M. Holmes N.T.H. Dawson F.H. River Habitat Survey: A new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality Boon P.J. Howell D.L. Freshwater Quality: Defining the Indefinable? 1997 215-234 The Stationery Office Edinburgh, UK
66. Refsgaard J.C. Storm B. MIKE SHE Singh V.P. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995 809-846 Water Resources Publications Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA
67. Refsgaard, J.C., Sørensen, H.R., 1997. The Danubian lowland ground water model, Part 1. Establishment of an integrated modelling system for modelling the hydrological and ecological impacts of the Gabcikovo Hydropower plant. In: Proceedings of the 2nd DHI Software User Conference, Helsingør, Denmark. Available from: http://www.dhi.dk/usercon/papers/98/uc97-p1.htm (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.dhi.dk/usercon/papers/98/uc97-p1.htm
68. Reichert P. AQUASIM - a tool for simulation and data analysis of aquatic systems Water Science and Technology 30 2 1994 21-30
69. Reichert P. Borchardt D. Henze M. Rauch W. Shanahan P. Somlyódy L. Vanrolleghem P. River Water Quality Model No. 1 (RWQM1): II. Biochemical process equations Water Science and Technology 43 5 2001 11-30
70. Rosenberg D.M. Resh V.H. Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates 1993 Chapman and Hall New York p. 488
71. Santhi C. Arnold J.G. Williams J.R. Hauck L.M. Dugas W.A. Application of a watershed model to evaluate management effects on point and nonpoint source pollution Transactions of the ASAE 44 6 2001 1559-1570
72. Santhi C. Arnold J.G. Williams J.R. Dugas W.A. Srinivasan R. Hauck L.M. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37 5 2001 1169-1188
73. Shanahan P. Borchardt D. Henze M. Rauch W. Reichert P. Somlyódy L. Vanrolleghem P. River water quality model No. 1 (RWQM1): I. Modelling approach Water Science and Technology 43 5 2001 1-9
74. Simpson J.C. Norris R.H. Biological assessment of river quality: Development of AUSRIVAS models and outputs Wright J.F. Sutcliffe D.W. Furse M.T. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters. RIVPACS and Other Techniques 2000 125-142 Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside, UK
75. Singh V.P. Frevert D.K. Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology 2002 Water Resources Publications LLC, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA p. 891
76. Singh V.P. Frevert D.K. Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications 2002 Water Resources Publications LLC, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA p. 950
77. Singh V.P. Woolhiser D.A. Mathematical modeling of watershed hydrology Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7 2002 270-292
78. Sivapalan M. Viney N.R. Zammit C. LASCAM: Large scale catchment model Singh V.P. Frevert D.K. Mathematical Models of Large Watershed Hydrology 2002 579-648 Water Resources Publications LLC, Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA
79. Stalnakner, C., Lamb, B.L., Henriksen, J., Bovee, K., Bartholow, J., 1995. The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology: A primer for IFIM. Biological Report 29. National Biological Service. US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, USA. p. 49
80. Tarboton, K.C., 2001. Hydrology based ecological habitat suitability indices for evaluating alternative management strategies. Presentation to the Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades Ecosystem. Available from: http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/regp/hsi/ HSIApr01⊤ogee.pdf (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.sfwmd.gov/org/pld/hsm/regp/hsi/HSIApr01⊤ogee.pdf
81. Tong S.T.Y. Chen W. Modeling the relationship between land use and surface water quality Journal of Environmental Management 66 2002 377-393
82. USDA-ARS (United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service), 2003. AGNPS web site. Available from: http://www.sedlab.olemiss.edu/AGNPS.html (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.sedlab.olemiss.edu/AGNPS.html
83. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1991. Guidance for water quality-based decisions: The TMDL process. Report EPA 440/4-91-001, US EPA, Athens, Georgia, USA. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/decisions/ (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/decisions/
84. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 1997. New policies for establishing and implementing total maximum daily loads (TMDLs). Memorandum by R. Perciasepe. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/ratepace.html (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/tmdl/ratepace.html
85. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2001. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources, BASINS Version 3.0. User's Manual. Report EPA 823/B-01-001. US EPA, Athens, Georgia, USA. p. 343
86. US EPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency), 2003. National Section 303(d) List Fact Sheet. Internet: http://oaspub.epa.gov/waters/nationalpt.control (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://oaspub.epa.gov/waters/nationalpt.control
87. US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1980. Habitat evaluation procedures: 102 ESM. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Ecological Services, Washington, DC, USA. Available from: http://policy.fws.gov/ESMindex.html (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://policy.fws.gov/ESMindex.html
88. SGS (United States Geological Survey), 2001. PHABSIM for Windows, User's manual and exercises. Open File Report 01-340, Midcontinent Ecological Science Center, USGS, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA. p. 299
89. USGS (United States Geological Survey), 2003. Habitat suitability index models series. USGS National Wetlands Research Center. Available from: http://www.nwrc.gov/wdb/pub/hsi/hsiintro.htm (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.nwrc.gov/wdb/pub/hsi/ hsiintro.htm
90. Van Griensven, A., 2002. Developments towards integrated water quality modelling for river basins. Ph.D. thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Hydrologie Nr. 40. p. 280
91. Van Griensven, A., Arnold, J.G., Bauwens, W., 2002. Integrated modelling of point sources, non-point sources and instream processes in river basins: application on the Wister Lake basin, Oklahoma, USA. In: van Griensven, A. (Ed.), Developments Towards Integrated Water Quality Modelling for River basins. Ph.D. thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Hydrologie, vol. 40. pp. 131-136
92. Van Griensven, A., Bauwens, W., 2002a. River water quality management for the Senne river basin (Belgium). In: van Griensven, A. (Ed.), Developments Towards Integrated Water Quality Modelling for River Basins. Ph.D. thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Hydrologie, vol. 40. pp. 182-188
93. Van Griensven, A., Bauwens, W., 2002b. Concepts for river water quality processes for an integrated river basin modelling. In: van Griensven, A. (Ed.), Developments Towards Integrated Water Quality Modelling for River Basins. Ph.D. thesis. Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Hydrologie, vol. 40. pp. 123-130
94. Wallingford Software, A., 2003. ISIS flow/hydrology. Available from: http://www.wallingfordsoftware.com/products/isis/ (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.wallingfordsoftware.com/products/ isis/
95. Ward, A.D., Alexander, C.A., Fausey, N.R., Dorsey, J.D., 1988. The ADAPT Agricultural drainage and pesticide transport model. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Modeling Agricultural, Forest, and Rangeland Hydrology. Chicago, Illinois, USA
96. WL/Delft Hydraulics, 2003. Sobek product info. Available from: http://www.sobek.nl (date of access: 10 Feb. 2004) http://www.sobek.nl
97. Wool, T.A., Ambrose, R.B., Martin, J.L., Comer, E.A., 2001. Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP) Version 6.0 DRAFT: User's Manual. US EPA Region 4. Atlanta, Georgia, USA. p. 267
98. Wright J.F. Moss D. Armitage P.D. Furse M.T. A preliminary classification of running-water sites in Great Britain based on macro-invertebrate species and the prediction of community type using environmental data Freshwater Biology 14 1984 221-256
99. Wright J.F. An introduction to RIVPACS Wright J.F. Sutcliffe D.W. Furse M.T. Assessing the Biological Quality of Freshwaters RIVPACS and Other Techniques 2000 1-24 Freshwater Biological Association Ambleside, UK
100. Young R.A. Onstad C.A. Bosch D.D. Anderson W.P. AGNPS: A nonpoint-source pollution model for evaluating agricultural watersheds Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 44 2 1989 168-173