Salt-induced changes in the vegetative anatomy of Prosopis strombulifera (Leguminosae)

Canadian Journal of Botany

Volumn 82, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 618-628

  Reinoso, Herminda ^a   Sosa, Laura ^b   Ramírez, Lucía ^c   Luna, Virginia ^d  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE QUÍMICA   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE SAN LUIS   (Argentina)

^c PUBLIC UNIVERSITY OF NAVARRE   (Spain)

^d National University of Rio Cuarto Laboratorio de Fisiologia Vegetal   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Anatomical changes; Hydroponics; NaCl; Prosopis strombulifera

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; PLANT CELL CULTURE; SALINITY MEASUREMENT; SALTS; SEED; VEGETATION;

HYPOCOTYLS; LIGNIFICATION;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ANATOMY; BOTANY; SALT;

FABACEAE; PROSOPIS; PROSOPIS STROMBULIFERA;

EID: 3543085749     PISSN: 00084026     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1139/b04-040     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, D.L., Del Aguila, J.B., and Bernardon, A.E. 1970. Las formaciones vegetales en la provincia de San Luis. Revista de Investigación Agropecuaria, INSTA. Buenos Aires, Argentina. [In Spanish.]
2. Baayen, R.P., Ouellette, G.B., and Rioux, D. 1996. Compartmentalization of decay in carnations resistant to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. dianthi. Phytopathology, 86: 1018-1031.
3. Bradbury, M., and Ahmad, R. 1990. The effect of silicon on the growth of Prosopis juliflora growing in saline soil. Plant Soil, 125: 71-74.
4. Burkart, A. 1937. Estudios morfológicos y etológicos en el género Prosopis. Darwiniana, 3: 27-47. [In Spanish.]
5. Burkart, A. 1952. Las Leguminosas Argentinas. Acme Agency, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [In Spanish.]
6. Burkart, A. 1976. A monograph of the genus Prosopis (Leguminosae subfam. Mimosoideae). Catalogue of the reconized species of Prosopis. J. Arnold Arbor. Harv. Univ. 57: 450-525.
7. Cantero, J.J., Cantero, A., and Cisneros, J.M. 1996. La vegetación de los paisajes hidro-halomórficos del centro de Argentina. Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina. [In Spanish.]
8. Cutter, E.G. 1980. Plant anatomy: experiment and interpretation, Part II. Organs. Edward Arnold, London.
9. D'Ambrigio de Argüeso, A. 1986. Manual de técnicas en histología Vegetal. Ed. Hemisferio Surm Buenos Aires, Argentina. [In Spanish.]
10. de la Vega, A. 1996. Variabilidad genética y estructuración poblacional en especies del género Prosopis (Leguminosae). Recurso biótico para reforestar zonas áridas. Doctoral thesis, ETSIA, Universidad Pública de Navarra, España. [In Spanish.]
11. Fahn, A. 1990. Plant anatomy. 4th ed. Butterworth, Heinemann, Jordan Hill, Oxford.
12. Fahn, A., and Cutler, D. 1992. Xerophytes. Gebrüder Borntraeger Berlin, Stuttgart.
13. Glenn, E.P., Brown, J.J., and Blumwald, E. 1999. Salt tolerance and crop potential of Halophytes. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 18: 227-255.
14. Grattan, S.R., and Grieve, C.M. 1999. Handbook of plant and crop stress. Edited by M. Pessarakli. Dekker, New York.
15. Greenway, H., and Munns, R. 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 149-190.
16. Grossoni, P., Bussotti, F., Tani, C., Gravano, E., Santorelli, S., and Bottacci, A. 1998. Morpho-anatomical alterations in leaves of Fagus sylvatica L., and Quercus ilex L. in different environmental stress condition. Chemosphere, 36: 919-924.
17. Hajibagheri, M.A., Yeo, A.R., and Flowers, T.J. 1985. Salt tolerence in Suaeda maritime (L.) Dum. Fine structure and ion concentrations in the apical region of roots. New Phytol. 99: 331-343.
18. Hwang, Y.H., and Chen, S.C. 1995. Anatomical resonses in Kandelia candel (L.) Druce seedling growing in the presence of different concentrations of NaCl. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. (Taipei), 36: 181-188.
19. Johansen, D.A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company. Inc., New York.
20. Lloyd, J., Kriedemann, P.E., and Aspinall, A. 1989. Comparative sensitivity of "Prior Lisbon" lemon and "Valencia" orange trees to foliar sodium and chloride concentration. Plant Cell Environ. 12: 529-540.
21. Lloyd, J., Kriedemann, P.E., and Aspinall, A. 1990. Contrast between Citrus species in response to salinization an analysis of photosynthesis and water relations for different rootstocks combinations. Physiol. Plant. 78: 236-246.
22. Oppenheimer, H.R. 1960. Adaptation to drought: xerophytism. Plant-water relationships in arid and semiarid conditions. Arid Zone Res. 15: 105-138.
23. Oven, P., Torelli, N., Shortle, W.C, and Zupančič, M. 1999. The formation of a ligno-suberised layer and necrophylactic periderm in beech bark (Fagus sylvatica L.). Flora, 194: 137-144.
24. Reinoso, H., Sosa, L., Colombo, C., Ochoa, F., and Luna, V. 2000. Morphological and physiological responses of Prosopis strombulifera (Lam.) Benth., to increasing salt conditions. In Plant Biology 2000: American Society of Plant Physiologists Annual Meeting, San Diego, Calif., 15-19 July 2000. Edited by D. Bush, D. Cosgrove, R. Hangarter, R. Jorgensen, D. Delmer, P. Springer, W. Lucas, and D. Schnell. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Baltimore, Md. pp. 210-202. [Abstr.]
25. Rhodes, D., and Felker, P. 1988. Mass screening of Prosopis (Mesquite) seedlings for growth at seawater salinity concentrations. For. Ecol. Manage. 24: 169-176.
26. Rivero, R., Ruiz, J.M., García, P.C., López-Lefebre, L.R, Sánchez, E., and Romero, L. 2001. Resistance to cold and heat stress: accumulation of phenolic compounds in tomato and watermelon plants. Plant Sci. 160: 315-321.
27. Romero-Aranda, R., Bondada, B.R., Syvertsen, J.P., and Grosser, J.W. 1998. Leaf characteristics and net gas exchange of diploid and autotetraploid Citrus. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 79: 153-160.
28. Rozema, J., van de Staaij, J., Björn, L.O., and Caldwell, M. 1997. UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: stress and regulation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12: 22-28.
29. Saadeddin, R., and Doddema, H. 1986. Anatomy of the "extreme" halophyte Arthrocnemum fruticosum (L.) Moq. in relation to its physiology. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 57: 531-544.
30. Schreiber, L., Hartmann, K., Skrabs, M., and Zeier, J. 1999. Apoplastic barriers in roots: chemical composition of endodermal and hypodermal cell walls. J. Exp. Bot. 50: 1267-1280.
31. Serrato Valenti, G., Ferro, M., Ferraro, D., and Riveros, F. 1991. Anatomical changes in Prosopis tamarugo Phil. Seedlings growing at different levels of NaCl salinity. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 68: 47-53.
32. Serrato Valenti, G., Melone, L., Orsi, O., and Riveros, F. 1992. Anatomical changes in Prosopis cineraria (L.) Ducehil. Seedlings growing at different levels of NaCl salinity. Ann. Bot. (Lond.), 70: 399-404.
33. Shannon, M.C., Grieve, C.M., and Francois, L.E. 1994. Whole-plant response to salinity. In Plant-environment interactions. Edited by R.E. Wilkinson. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York. pp. 199-244.
34. Sosa, L., Reginato, M., Reinoso, H., and Luna, V. 2002. Efectos de cloruro y sulfato de Na sobre el crecimiento de plántulas de Prosopis strombulifera. In Actas XI Reunión Latinoamericana de Fisiología Vegetal, Punta del Este, Uruguay, 22-25 October 2002. El Copista, Córdoba, Argentina. [In Spanish.]
35. Waisel, Y. 1972. Biology of Halophytes. Academic Press, New York.
36. Wang, L.W, Showalter, A.M., and Ungar, I.A. 1997. Effect of salinity on growth, ion content, and cell wall chemistry in Atriplex prostata (Chenopodiaceae). Am. J. Bot. 84: 1247-1255.