Capture locations of coyotes, Canis latrans, bobcats, Lynx rufus, and raccoons, Procyon lotor, relative to home range boundaries

Canadian Field-Naturalist

Volumn 117, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 472-474

  Gipson, Philip S ^a   Kamler, Jan F ^a,b  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAMMAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Bobcat; Canis latrans; Capture locations; Coyote; Home range boundaries; Lynx rufus; Procyon lotor; Raccoon

Indexed keywords

CANID; HOME RANGE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION; VULNERABILITY;

KANSAS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

CANIDAE; CANIS; CANIS LATRANS; LYNX; LYNX RUFUS; PROCYON; PROCYON LOTOR;

EID: 3543085732     PISSN: 00083550     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22621/cfn.v117i3.811     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Andelt, W. F. 1985. Behavioral ecology of coyotes in south Texas. Wildlife Monographs 94. 45 pages.
2. Bowen, W. O. 1982. Determining age of coyotes, Canis latrans, by tooth sections and tooth wear patterns. Canadian Field-Naturalist 96: 339-341.
3. Crowe, D. M. 1975. Aspects of aging, growth and reproduction of bobcats in Wyoming. Journal of Mammalogy 56: 177-198.
4. Gese, E. M., O. J. Rongstad, and W. R. Mytton. 1988. Home range and habitat use of coyotes in southeastern Colorado. Journal of Wildlife Management 52: 640-646.
5. Gier, H. T. 1968. Coyotes in Kansas. Revised. Kansas State College Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 393. 97 pages.
6. Harris, C. E. 1983. Differential behavior of coyotes with regard to home range limits. Ph.D. dissertation. Utah State University, Logan. 120 pages.
7. Hibler, S. J. 1977. Coyote movement patterns with emphasis on home range characteristics. M.S. thesis, Utah State University, Logan. 112 pages.
8. Kamler, J. F. 1998. Ecology and interspecific relationships of mammalian predators on Fort Riley Military Reservation, Kansas. M.S. thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan. 150 pages.
9. Kamler, J. F., and P. S. Gipson. 2000. Space and habitat use by resident and transient coyotes. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 2106-2111.
10. Kaufmann, J. H. 1982. Raccoon and allies. Pages 567-585 in Wild mammals of North America. Edited by J. A. Chapman and G. A. Feldhamer. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.
11. Kie, J. G., J. A. Baldwin, and C. J. Evans. 1994. CALHOME: home range analysis program. U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Fresno, California. 19 pages.
12. Kleiman, D. G., and J. F. Eisenberg. 1973. Comparisons of canid and felid social systems from an evolutionary perspective. Animal Behaviour 21: 637-659.
13. Laundré, J. W., and B. L. Keller. 1981. Home range use by coyotes in Idaho. Animal Behaviour 19: 449-461.
14. Laundré, J. W., and B. L. Keller. 1983. Trappability of coyotes relative to home range boundaries. Canadian Journal of Zoology 61: 1932-1934.
15. Messier, F., and C. Barrette. 1982. The social system of the coyote (Canis latrans) in a forested habitat. Canadian Journal of Zoology 60: 1743-1753.
16. Mohr, C. O. 1947. Table of equivalent populations of North American small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37: 223-249.
17. Sacks, B. N., K. M. Blejwas, and M. M. Jaeger. 1999. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to removal methods on a northern California ranch. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 939-949.
18. Sandell, M. 1989. The mating tactics and spacing patterns of solitary carnivores. Pages 164-182 in Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, volume 1. Edited by J. L. Gittleman. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York.
19. Travaini, A., J. Aldama, and M. Delibes. 1993. Red fox capture locations in relation to home range boundaries. Mammalia 57: 448-451.
20. Wells, M. C., and M. Bekoff. 1981. An observational study of scent-marking in coyotes, Canis latrans. Animal Behaviour 29: 332-350.
21. Windberg, L. A., and F. F. Knowlton. 1988. Management implications of coyote spacing patterns in southern Texas. Journal of Wildlife Management 52: 632-640.
22. Windberg, L. A., and F. F. Knowlton. 1990. Relative vulnerability of coyotes to some capture procedures. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18: 282-290.
23. Woodruff, R. A., and B. L. Keller. 1982. Dispersal, daily activity, and home range of coyotes in southeastern Idaho. Northwest Science 56: 199-207.