Programs assessing implementation and effectiveness of state forest practice rules and BMPs in the West

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution: Focus

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 143-169

  Ice, George G ^a   Dent, Liz ^b   Robben, Josh ^b   Cafferata, Pete ^c   Light, Jeff ^d   Sugden, Brian ^d   Cundy, Terry ^e  

^a NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT   (United States)

^b Oregon Department of Forestry   (United States)

^c California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection   (United States)

^d Plum Creek Timber Company   (United States)

^e Potlatch Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

Arizona; BMPs; California; Colorado; Forest practices; Idaho; Montana; Nevada; New Mexico; Oregon; Utah; Washington; Water quality; Wyoming

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; FORESTRY PRACTICE; MONITORING SYSTEM; NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION; POLLUTION CONTROL; WATER QUALITY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3543065567     PISSN: 15677230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:WAFO.0000012821.68577.6b     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Bauer, S. B., Almas, D., Johnson, M., Stender, P. and Martin, D.: 1988, State of Idaho Forest Practices Water Quality Management Plan, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare - Division of Environment, Water Quality Bureau, Boise, ID, 144 pp.
2. Cafferata, P. H. and Munn, J. R.: 2002, Hillslope Monitoring Program: Monitoring Results from 1996 through 2001, Monitoring Study Group Final Report prepared for the California State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, CA, 114 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof. fire.ca.gov/pdfs/ComboDocument_8_.pdf (March 18, 2003).
3. Cafferata, P. H. and Spittler, T. F.: 1998, 'Logging impacts of the 1970's vs. the 1990's in the Caspar creek watershed', in R. R. Ziemer, technical coordinator, Proceedings from the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 8, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR-168, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp. 103-115. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects /water/caspubs.html (March 18 2003).
4. California State Board of Forestry (CSBOF): 1993, Assessing the Effectiveness of California's Forest Practice Rules in Protecting Water Quality: Recommendations for a Pilot Monitoring Project and Longer Term Assessment Program, prepared by the Monitoring Study Group with assistance from William M. Kier Associates, Sacramento, CA, 55 pp.
5. California State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection (CSBOF): 1999, Hillslope Monitoring Program: Monitoring Results from 1996 through 1998, interim report prepared by the Monitoring Study Group, Sacramento, CA, 70 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/rept9.pdf (March 18, 2003).
6. California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB): 1987, Final Report of the Forest Practice Rules Assessment Team to the State Water Resources Control Board (the 208 Report), California State Water Resources Control Board, Sacramento, CA, 200 pp.
7. Colla, J. and DuPont, J.: 2000, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 1999, Idaho Department of Lands, Coeur d'Alene, ID, 34 pp.
8. Colorado State Forest Service (CSFS): 1998, Colorado Forest Stewardship Guidelines to Protect Water Quality - Best Management Practices for Colorado, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.
9. Cook, P. S. and O'Laughlin, J.: 2000, Toward Sustainable Forest Management. Part II - The Role and Effect of Timber Harvesting in Idaho, Idaho Forest, Wildlife and Range Policy Analysis Group, Report 19, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID. On the world wide web at www.uidaho.edu/cfwr/pag/pdfs /Report19.pdf (March 18, 2003).
10. Corner, R. A., Bassman, A. and Moore, B. C.: 1996, 'Monitoring timber harvest impacts on stream sedimentation: Instream vs. upslope methods, Western Journal of Applied Forestry 11 (1): 25-32.
11. Cundy, T., Ice, G., Whittemore, R., Chen, C. and Bolton, S.: 2001, 'The Mica Creek watershed study: Hydrologic model testing and comparison, in Proceedings of the 2001 NCASI West Coast Regional Meeting, National Council for Air and Stream Improvement, Inc., Research Triangle Par, NC.
12. Cupp, C. E., Metzler, J., Grost, R. T. and Tappel, P.: 1999, Monitoring Approach and Procedures to Evaluate Effectiveness of Culverts in Providing Upstream Passage of Salmonids, TFW-MAG1-99-006, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 53 pp.
13. Dent, L.: 2001, Harvest Effects on Riparian Functions and Structure under Current Oregon Forest Practice Rules, technical report 12, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR. On the world wide web at http://159.121.125.11/FP/fpmp/Projects/Riparian_Inventory/ RipFunFinal.pdf (March 18, 2003).
14. Dent, L.: 2002, Forest Practices Monitoring Program Strategy, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR, 32 pp. On the world wide web at http://159. 121.125.11/FP/fpmp/default.htm (March 18, 2003).
15. Department of Natural Resources (DNR): 2002, Forests and Fish Report (1999). On the world wide web at http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/ forestpractices /rules/forestsandfish.pdf (March 18, 2003).
16. Durgin, P. B., Johnston, R. R. and Parsons, A. M.: 1989, Critical Sites Erosion Study, Technical Repoli Vol. I: Causes of Erosion on Private Timberlands in Northern California: Observations of the Interdisciplinary Team, final report prepared by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Arcata, CA, 50 pp.
17. Ethridge, R.: 2003, Montana Forestry Best Management Practices Monitoring - The 2002 Forestry BMP Audit Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Missoula, MT.
18. Ethridge, R. and Heffernan, P.: 2001, Montana Forestry Best Management Practices Monitoring - The 2000 Forestry BMP Audit Report, Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation, Missoula, MT, 69 pp.
19. Green, W. P., Hashim, W. A., Roberts, D., Hempleman, C. and Filip, D.: 2000, Washington's Water Quality Management Plan to Control Nonpoint Source Pollution, Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 583 pp.
20. Grizzel, J., McGowan, M., Smith, D. and Beechie, T.: 2000, Streamside Buffers and Large Woody Debris Recruitment: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Watershed Analysis Prescriptions in the North Cascades Region, TFW-MAG1-00-003, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 38 pp.
21. HDR Engineering, Inc.: 2002, Lochsa River Temperature Model, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID.
22. Helms, J. A. (ed.): 1998, The Dictionary of Forestry, Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD.
23. Hoelscher, B., DuPont, J., Robertson, C., Hinson, J., McGreer, D. and Schult, D.: 2001, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 2000, Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID, 36 pp.
24. Holter, J.: 2001, The History of Washington's Forest Practices Rules, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 12 pp.
25. Hosking, D., Henson, S. and Kappe, K.: 1982, Utah Silvicultural Nonpoint Source Assessment Report, State of Utah, Natural Resources and Energy, Division of State Lands and Forestry.
26. Ice, G. G.: 2002, 'Assessing nonpoint source pollution and setting water quality standards: Lessons from forest watershed research', Hydrologic Science and Technology 18 (1-4): 101-111.
27. Ice, G. G. and Binkley, D.: 2003, 'Forest streamwater concentrations of nitrogen and phosphorus: A comparison with EPA's proposed water quality criteria', Journal of Forestry 101 (1): 21-29.
28. Ice, G., Loehle, C., Beebe, J. and Cundy, T.: 2002, 'Calibrating and validating hydrologic model performance for a forested watershed in a snow regime: The dueling model mica creek watershed study', in Proceedings of the Second Federal Interagency Hydrologic Modeling Conference, Las Vegas, NV. On CD-ROM.
29. Ice, G. and Reiter, M.: in press, 'Lessons learned about watershed assessments', in Proceedings of the 2002 American Institute of Hydrology Annual Meeting, American Institute of Hydrology, St. Paul, MN.
30. Ice, G. G. and Stuart, G. W.: 2001, 2000 Progress Report. State Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Programs for Silviculture - Sustained Success, National Association of State Foresters (NASF), Washington, DC.
31. Lee, W. K.: 2002, Wyoming Silvicultural Best Management Practices Field Audit: Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation, Wyoming Timber Industry Association c/o Louisiana Pacific Corporation, Saratoga, WY.
32. Lewis, J.: 1998, 'Evaluating the impacts of logging activities on erosion and suspended sediment transport in the caspar creek watersheds', in R. R. Ziemer, technical coordinator, Proceedings from the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 6, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR-168, USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, CA, pp. 55-69. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us /projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).
33. Lewis, J., Mori, S. R., Keppeler, E. T. and Ziemer, R. R.: 2001, 'Impacts of logging on storm peak flows, flow volumes and suspended sediment loads in Caspar Creek, California', in M. S. Wigmosta and S. J. Burges (eds.), Land Use and Watersheds: Human Influence on Hydrology and Geomorphology in Urban and Forest Areas. Water Science and Application Volume 2, American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, pp. 85-125. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs.fed.us/projects/water/ caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).
34. Lewis, J. and Rice, R.: 1989, Critical Sites Erosion Study Tech. Rep. Vol. II: Site Conditions Related to Erosion on Private Timberlands in Northern California, final report prepared by the USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station and the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Arcata, CA, 95 pp.
35. Ligon, F., Rich, A., Rynearson, G., Thornburgh, D. and Trush, W.: 1999, Report of the Scientific Review Panel on California Forest Practice Rules and Salmonid Habitat, California Resources Agency, Sacramento, CA, 92 pp. On the world wide web at http://ceres.ca.gov/cra/srp.html (March 18, 2003).
36. McGreer, D. J., Cundy, T. W. and Gravelle, J. A.: 1995, 'Mica creek cumulative watershed effects study', in T. J. Ward (ed.), Watershed Management: Planning for the 21st Century, pp. 300-309, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York.
37. Montana Environmental Quality Council (EQC): 1988, House Joint Resolution 49 - Forest Practices and Watershed Effects, Report to the 51st Montana Legislature, 93 pp.
38. Montana Department of Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ): 2001, Montana Nonpoint Source Management Plan: A Watershed Approach, Montana Department of Environmental Quality Helena, MT. On the world wide web at http://www.deq.state.mt.us/ppa/nonpoint/NonpointPlan.asp (March 18, 2003).
39. O'Connell, M. A., Hallett, J. G., West, S. D., Kelsey, K. A., Manuwal, D. A., and Pearson, S. F.: 2000, Effectiveness of Riparian Management Zones in Providing Habitat for Wildlife, TFW-LWAG1-00-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 461 pp.
40. Oregon Department of Forestry (ODF) and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ): 2002, Oregon Department of Forestry and Department of Environmental Quality Sufficiency Analysis: A Statewide Evaluation of FPA Effectiveness in Protecting Water Quality, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR.
41. Paul, J., Dent, L. and Allen, M.: 2002, ODF Compliance with Fish Passage and Peak Flow Requirements at Stream Crossing, Final Study Results, ODF Technical Report 14, Oregon Department of Forestry, Salem, OR. On the world wide web at http://159.121.125.11/FP/fpmp/default.htm (March 18, 2003).
42. Pentec Environmental, Inc.: 1991, Methods of Testing Effectiveness of Washington's Forest Practice Rules and Regulations with Regard to Sediment Production and Transport to Streams, TFW-WQ8-91-008, Pentec Environmental, Inc., Edmonds, WA, 133 pp.
43. Plum Creek Timber Company: 2000, Final Native Fish Habitat Conservation Plan. On the world wide web at http://www.plumcreek. com/environment/HCP-fish.cfm (March 18, 2003).
44. Rae, S. P.: 1995, Board of Forestry Pilot Monitoring Program: Instream Component, report submitted to the California Department of Forestry under Interagency Agreement No. 8CA28103, Vol. 1, 49 pp., Vol. 2: Data Tables and Training Materials, California Department of Forestry, Sacramento, CA.
45. Rashin, E., Clishe, C., Loch, A. and Bell, J.: 1999, Effectiveness of Forest Road and Timber Harvest Best Management Practices with Respect to Sediment-Related Water Quality Impacts, TFW-WQ6-99-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 118 pp. plus appendices.
46. Rashin, E. and Graber, C.: 1992, Effectiveness of Washington's Forest Practice Riparian Management Zone Regulations for Protection of Stream Temperature, TFW-WQ6-92-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 88 pp.
47. Rashin, E. and Graber, C.: 1993, Effectiveness of Best Management Practices for Aerial Application of Forest Pesticides, TFW-WQ1-93-001, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA, 137 pp.
48. Rey, M.: 1980, 'The effect of the clean water act on forestry practices', in Proceedings: U. S. Forestry and Water and Water Quality: What Course in the 80's, pp. 11-30. Water Pollution Control Federation, Washington, DC.
49. Schuett-Harnes, D. and Conrad, B.: 2002, Proposed Study Design for Monitoring the Effectiveness of the FFR Riparian Prescriptions, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Olympia, WA, 27 pp.
50. Schuett-Harnes, D., Sturhan, N., Lautz, K., McIntosh, R., Gough, M. and Rodgers, C.: 1996, Proposal for a TFW Monitoring Strategy to Determine Effectiveness of Forest Practices in Protecting Aquatic Resources, TFW-AM9-96-007, Northwest Indian Fisheries Commission, Olympia, WA.
51. Soicher, A.: 1999a, Assessing the Effectiveness of Large Woody Debris Prescriptions in the Acme Watershed. Phase 1 - Baseline Data Collection, TFW-MAG1-99-002, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 48 pp.
52. Soicher, A.: 1999b, Assessing the Effectiveness of Mass Wasting Prescriptions in the Acme Watershed. Phase 1 - Baseline Data Collection, TFW-MAG1-99-003, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 31 pp.
53. Spittler, T. E.: 1995, Pilot Monitoring Program Geologic Input for the Hillslope Component, report submitted to the California Department of Forestry under Interagency Agreement No. 8CA38400, Sacramento, CA, 18 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/PMP-geology.pdf (March 18, 2003).
54. Timber, Fish and Wildlife Field Implementation Committee (TFW): 1991, 1991 Forest Practices Compliance Survey, TFW-000-98-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 173 pp.
55. Timber, Fish and Wildlife Field Implementation Committee (TFW): 1994, 1993 Riparian Management Zone Survey, TFW-000-94-001, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, 21 pp.
56. Tuttle, A. E.: 1995, Board of Forestry Pilot Monitoring Program: Hillslope Component, report submitted to CDF/CSBOF under Contract No. 9CA38120, Sacramento, CA, 29 pp plus Appendices A and B: Hillslope Monitoring Instructions and Forms. On the world wide web at http://www.bof.fire.ca.gov/pdfs/tuttle.pdf (March 18, 2003).
57. USDA Forest Service (USDAFS): 1992 Investigating Water Quality in the Pacific Southwest Region: Best Management Practices Evaluation Program - User's Guide, USDA Forest Service, Region 5, San Francisco, CA, 158 pp.
58. USDA Forest Service (USDAFS): 2002, Forest Resources of the United States, 2002. On the world wide web at http://www.ncrs.fs.fed.us/ 4801/FIADB/rpa_tabler/Draft_RPA_2002_Forest_Resource_Tables.pdf. (March 13, 2003).
59. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): 1977, SAM 31-Regulatory Programs for Nonpoint Source Control, September 22, 1977, EPA Water Planning Division, Washington, DC.
60. Washington Forest Practices Board: 1997, Standard Methodology for Conducting Watershed Analysis under Chapter 222-22 WAC, Version 4.0. On the world wide web at http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/fp/ops/wsamanual.html (March 18, 2003).
61. Wing, M. and Skaugset, An: 1998, 'GIS casts a line: Examining salmon habitat in Oregon streams, Geo Info Systems 8 (7): 36-41.
62. Zaroban, D. W., Love, B., Colla, J., Lesch, G., Heimer, J., Lehner, J., Lukens, B., Poirier, S., Lee, B. and David, K.: 1997, Forest Practices Water Quality Audit 1996, Idaho Department of Health and Welfare - Division of Environmental Quality, Boise, ID, 32 pp.
63. Ziemer, R. R., technical coordinator: 1998, Proceedings of the Conference on Coastal Watersheds: The Caspar Creek Story, May 6, 1998, Ukiah, CA, General Technical Report PSW GTR-168, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 149 pp. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw.fs. us/projects/water/caspubs.html (March 18, 2003).
64. Ziemer, R. R.: 2001, 'Caspar Creek', in T. Marutani, G. J. Brierley, N. A. Trustrum and M. Page, (eds.), Source-to-Sink Sedimentary Cascades in Pacific Rim Geo-systems, Matsumoto Sabo Work Office, Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Motomachi, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan, pp. 78-85. On the world wide web at http://www.rsl.psw/fs.fed.us/projects/ water/caspubs. html (March 18, 2003).