Towards a UML profile for QoS: A contribution in the reliability domain

Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Software and Performance, WOSP'04

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 197-206

  Cortellessa, Vittorio ^a   Pompei, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF L'AQUILA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Component based software systems; Software Performance; Software Reliability; UML profile

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER HARDWARE; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ERROR ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBABILITY; QUALITY OF SERVICE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPONENT-BASED SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE PERFORMANCE; SOFTWARE RELIABILITY; UML PROFILE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 3543055809     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. J. Aagedal and E. Ecklund, Modelling QoS: Towards a UML profile, In proc. UML2002.
2. L. Apvrille et al., A new UML profile for Real-Time system formal design and validation, In proc. UML2001.
3. V. Cortellessa et al., Early reliability assessment of UML-based software models, In proc. WOSP2002.
4. H. Gomaa, Designing Concurrent, Distributed, and Real-Time Applications with UML, Addison-Wesley, 2000.
5. K. Goseva-Popstojanova and K. S. Trivedi, Architecture-based approach to reliability assessment of software systems, Performance Evaluation, vol.45, no.2/3, June 2001.
6. D. Hamlet, Properties of software systems synthesized from components, submitted to Journal of Systems and Software, October 2002, www.cs.pdx.edu/ ~hamlet/jss.pdf
7. L. Heaton, UML profile for CORBA specification, formal/02-04-01, OMG.
8. J. Horgan and A. Mathur, Software Testing and Reliability, in Handbook of Software Reliability Engineering, Michael R. Lye (edt.), McGraw-Hill, 1996, pp531-566.
9. ISO/IEC JTC1/SC21, "QoS - Basic framework", January 1995.
10. A. Zarras and V. Issarny, UML-based modelling of software reliability, In proc. ICSE 2001.
11. J.C. Laprie, Dependable computing and fault tolerance: concepts and terminology, In proc. FTCS 1985.
12. N. Medvidovic et al., Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language, ACM TOSEM 11(1): 2-57 (2002).
13. Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Core Proposal, Revised Submission to OMG RFP ad/01-11-14
14. OMG, "White Paper on Profile mechanism", ad/99-04-07, April, 1999.
15. OMG, "UML profile for modelling Quality of Service and Fault Tolerance characteristics and mechanisms", Request for Proposal, ad/02-01-07, January 2002.
16. OMG, "UML 2 Superstructure Final Adopted Specification", ptc/03-08-02, August 2003.
17. S. Pllana and T. Farhinger, On customizing the UML for modelling performance-oriented applications, In proc. UML2002.
18. th ed., Addison Wesley, 2001.
19. J. B. Warmer, A. G. Kleppe, The Object Constraint Language: Precise Modeling with UML, Addison Wesley, 1998.
20. "UML Profile for Schedulability, Performance, and Time Specification", ptc/02-03-02, OMG Adopted Specification.