Breaking the species barrier: Derivation of germline-competent embryonic stem cells from Mus spretus x C57BL/6 hybrids

Stem Cells

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 441-447

  Hochepied, Tino ^a   Schoonjans, Luc ^b   Staelens, Jan ^a   Kreemers, Veerle ^b   Danloy, Sophie ^b   Puimège, Leen ^a   Collen, Désiré ^b   Van Roy, Frans ^a   Libert, Claude ^a,c  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Embryonic stem cell; Germline transmission; Mus spretus; TNF

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL TYPE; CHIMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA POLYMORPHISM; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CELL; EMBRYO STEM CELL; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MOLECULAR CLONING; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS SPRETUS; MUTAGENESIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROGENY; RABBIT; RAT; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STEM CELL;

ANIMALIA; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS SPRETUS; MUSCULUS; ORYCTOLAGUS CUNICULUS;

EID: 3543044964     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.22-4-441     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bonhomme F, Guenet JL, Dod B et al. The polyphyletic origin of laboratory inbred mice and their rate of evolution. J Linnean Soc 1987;30:51-58.
2. Silver M. Systematics of the Mus species group, the house mouse, and the classical inbred strains. In: Silver M, ed. Mouse Genetics: Concepts and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995:376.
3. Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton-Davidian J et al. Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus. Biochem Genet 1984;22:275-303.
4. Bonhomme F, Martin S, Thaler L. [Hybridization between Mus musculus L. and Mus spretus Lataste under laboratory conditions (author's transl).] Experientia 1978; 34:1140-1141.
5. Guenet JL, Bonhomme F. Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model. Trends Genet 2003;19:24-31.
6. Manenti G, Gariboldi M, Elango R et al. Genetic mapping of a pulmonary adenoma resistance (Par1) in mouse. Nat Genet 1996;12:455-457.
7. Nagase H, Bryson S, Cordell H et al. Distinct genetic loci control development of benign and malignant skin tumours in mice. Nat Genet 1995;10:424-429.
8. Santos J, Montagutelli X, Acevedo A et al. A new locus for resistance to gamma-radiation-induced thymic lymphoma identified using inter-specific consomic and inter-specific recombinant congenic strains of mice. Oncogene 2002;21:6680-6683.
9. Staelens J, Wielockx B, Puimege L et al. Hyporesponsiveness of SPRET/Ei mice to lethal shock induced by tumor necrosis factor and implications for a TNF-based antitumor therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002;99: 9340-9345.
10. Schoonjans L, Kreemers V, Danloy S et al. Improved generation of germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from inbred mouse strains. STEM CELLS 2003; 21:90-97.
11. Schoonjans L, Moreadith R. Pluripotent embryonic stem (ES) cell lines, improved methods for their production, and their use for germ line transmission and for the generation of genetically modified animals. Patent application WO 02/00847A2, January 3, 2002.
12. Bradley A. Production and analysis of chimeric mice. In: Robertson E, ed. Teratocarcinomas and Embryonic Stem Cells: A Practical Approach. Oxford: JRI Press, 1987:113-151.
13. Robertson E, Bradley A, Kuehn M et al. Germ-line transmission of genes introduced into cultured pluripotential cells by retroviral vector. Nature 1986;323:445-448.
14. Forejt J. Hybrid sterility in the mouse. Trends Genet 1996;12:412-417.
15. Bishop CE, Boursot P, Baron B et al. Most classical Mus musculus domesticus laboratory mouse strains carry a Mus musculus musculus Y chromosome. Nature 1985; 315:70-72.
16. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292:154-156.
17. Graves KH, Moreadith RW. Derivation and characterization of putative pluripotential embryonic stem cells from preimplantation rabbit embryos. Mol Reprod Dev 1993;36:424-433.
18. Iannaccone PM, Taborn GU, Garton RL et al. Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the rat are capable of producing chimeras. Dev Biol 1994;163:288-292.
19. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY et al. Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotechnol 2000;18:399-404.
20. Auerbach W, Dunmore JH, Fairchild-Huntress V et al. Establishment and chimera analysis of 129/SvEv- and C57BL/6-derived mouse embryonic stem cell lines. Biotechniques 2000;29:1024-1028,1030,1032.
21. Kress C, Vandormael-Pournin S, Baldacci P et al. Non permissiveness for mouse embryonic stem (ES) cell derivation circumvented by a single backcross to 129/Sv strain: establishment of ES cell lines bearing the Omd conditional lethal mutation. Mamm Genome 1998; 9:998-1001.
22. McWhir J, Schnieke AE, Ansell R et al. Selective ablation of differentiated cells permits isolation of embryonic stem cell lines from murine embryos with a non-permissive genetic background. Nat Genet 1996;14:223-226.
23. Van der Auwera I, Pijnenborg R, Koninckx PR. The influence of in-vitro culture versus stimulated and untreated oviductal environment on mouse embryo development and implantation. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2570-2574.
24. Haldane JBS. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J Genet 1922;12:101-109.
25. Eggan K, Akutsu H, Loring J et al. Hybrid vigor, fetal overgrowth, and viability of mice derived by nuclear cloning and tetraploid embryo complementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:6209-6214.
26. Brook FA, Evans EP, Lord CJ et al. The derivation of highly germline-competent embryonic stem cells containing NOD-derived genome. Diabetes 2003;52: 205-208.