The battle for the use of drugs for therapeutic purposes in optometry: Lessons for clinical psychology

Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 323-328

  Wallis, Norman ^a   Wedding, Danny ^b,c  

^a Natl Bd of Examiners in Optometry ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543044401     PISSN: 07357028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.35.4.323     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Borish, I. M. (2001). Optometry: Its heritage and its future. Indiana Journal of Optometry, 4(2). Retrieved July 19, 2003, from http://www.opt. indiana.edu/IndJOpt/fall01/borish.htm
2. Hayes, S. C., & Heiby, E. M. (1998). Prescription privileges for psychologists: A critical appraisal. Reno, NV: Context Press.
3. Heiby, E. M. (2002). It is time for a moratorium of legislation enabling prescription privileges for psychologists. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 256-258.
4. Robiner, W. N., Bearman, D. L., Berman, M., Grove, W. M., Colón, E., Armstrong, J., & Mareck, S. (2002). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A looming health hazard? Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 231-248.
5. Sammons, M. T., Paige, R. U., & Levant, R. F. (Eds.). (2003). Prescriptive authority for psychologists: A history and guide. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.