Softening the supersymmetric flavor problem in orbifold grand unified theories

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 69, Issue 11, 2004, Pages

  Kajiyama, Yuji ^a   Kubo, Jisuke ^a,b   Terao, Haruhiko ^a  

^a KANAZAWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PHYSIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543041277     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.69.116006     Document Type: Article

References (105)

1. For a recent review, see, for instance, G.L. Kane, TASI Lectures on Weak Scale Supersymmetry: A Top Motivated Bottom Up Approach, hep-ph/0202185, and references therein.
2. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D 26, 287 (1982)
3. N. Sakai and T. Yanagida, Nucl. Phys. B197, 533 (1982).
4. H. Murayama and A. Pierce, Phys. Rev. D 65, 055009 (2002).
5. Y. Kawamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 105, 691 (2001)
6. Prog. Theor. Phys.Y. Kawamura105, 999 (2001).
7. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 63, 105007 (2001).
8. G. Altarelli and F. Feruglio, Phys. Lett. B 511, 257 (2001).
9. L. Hall and Y. Nomura, Phys. Rev. D 64, 055003 (2001).
10. E. Witten, Talk given at (Formula presented) International Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions (SUSY02), Hamburg, Germany, 17–23 June 2002, hep-ph/0201018
11. T. Friedmann and E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 7, 577 (2003).
12. S. Dimopoulos and D. Sutter, Nucl. Phys. B452, 496 (1995).
13. L. Hall, V.A. Kostelecky, and S. Raby, Nucl. Phys. B267, 415 (1986)
14. F. Gabbiani and A. Masiero, Phys. Lett. B 209, 289 (1988).
15. J. Ellis and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 110B, 44 (1982)
16. Phys. Lett.R. Barbieri and R. Gatto, 110B, 211 (1982)
17. B.A. Campbell, Phys. Rev. D 28, 209 (1983)
18. M.J. Duncan, Nucl. Phys. B221, 285 (1983)
19. J.F. Donoghue, H.P. Nilles, and D. Wyler, Phys. Lett. 128B, 55 (1983).
20. J. Ellis, S. Ferrara, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Phys. Lett. 114B, 231 (1982)
21. Phys. Lett.W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, 121B, 321 (1983)
22. Phys. Lett.J. Polchinski and M.B. Wise, 125B, 393 (1983)
23. Phys. Lett.F. del Aguila, M.B. Gavela, J.A. Grifols, and A. Méndez, 126B, 71 (1983)
24. Phys. Lett.D.V. Nanopoulos and M. Srednicki, 128B, 61 (1983).
25. S. Bertolini, F. Borzumati, A. Masiero, and G. Ridolfi, Nucl. Phys. B353, 591 (1991)
26. R. Barbieri and G.F. Giudice, Phys. Lett. B 309, 86 (1993).
27. F. Gabbiani, E. Gabrielli, A. Masiero, and L. Silvestrini, Nucl. Phys. B477, 321 (1996)
28. A. Bartl, T. Gajdosik, E. Lunghi, A. Masiero, W. Porod, H. Stremnitzer, and O. Vives, Phys. Rev. D 64, 076009 (2001), and references therein.
29. M. Dine and A.E. Nelson, Phys. Rev. D 48, 1277 (1993)
30. Phys. Rev. DM. Dine, A.E. Nelson, and Y. Shirman, 51, 1362 (1995)
31. for a review, see G.F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi, Phys. Rep. 322, 419 (1999).
32. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, Nucl. Phys. B557, 79 (1999)
33. G.F. Giudice, M.A. Luty, H. Murayama, and R. Rattazi, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 027 (1998).
34. D.E. Kaplan, G.D. Kribs, and M. Schmaltz, Phys. Rev. D 62, 035010 (2000)
35. Z. Chacko, M.A. Luty, A.E. Nelson, and E. Ponton, J. High Energy Phys. 01, 003 (2000).
36. In Refs. 19202122, permutation symmetries have been used to soften the SUSY flavor problem.
37. L.J. Hall and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3985 (1995)
38. C.D. Carone, L.J. Hall, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 53, 6282 (1996).
39. K. Hamaguchi, M. Kakizaki, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 68, 056007 (2003).
40. K.S. Babu, T. Kobayashi, and J. Kubo, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075018 (2003).
41. T. Kobayashi, J. Kubo, and H. Terao, Phys. Lett. 568B, 83 (2003).
42. M. Lanzagorta and G.G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B 364, 163 (1995)
43. Phys. Lett. BP.M. Ferreira, I. Jack, and D.R.T. Jones, 357, 359 (1995)
44. Phys. Lett. BS.A. Abel and B.C. Allanach, 415, 371 (1997)
45. S.F. King and G.G. Ross, Nucl. Phys. B530, 3 (1998)
46. I. Jack and D.R.T. Jones, Phys. Lett. B 443, 177 (1998)
47. G.K. Yeghiyan, M. Jurcisin, and D.I. Kazakov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 14, 601 (1999)
48. Mod. Phys. Lett. AM. Jurcisin and D.I. Kazakov, 14, 671 (1999).
49. A. Karch, T. Kobayashi, J. Kubo, and G. Zoupanos, Phys. Lett. B 441, 235 (1998)
50. M. Luty and R. Rattazzi, J. High Energy Phys. 11, 001 (1999).
51. A.E. Nelson and M.J. Strassler, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 030 (2000)
52. T. Kobayashi and H. Terao, Phys. Rev. D 64, 075003 (2001).
53. T. Kobayashi, H. Nakano, and H. Terao, Phys. Rev. D 65, 015006 (2002)
54. Phys. Rev. DT. Kobayashi, H. Nakano, T. Noguchi, and H. Terao, 66, 095011 (2002)
55. T. KobayashiH. NakanoT. NoguchiH. TeraoJ. High Energy Phys. 0302, 022 (2003).
56. M.A. Luty and R. Sundrum, Phys. Rev. D 65, 066004 (2002)
57. Phys. Rev. DM.A. LutyR. Sundrum67, 045007 (2003).
58. S.A. Abel and S.F. King, Phys. Rev. D 59, 095010 (1999)
59. Phys. Rev. DT. Kobayashi and K. Yoshioka, 62, 115003 (2000)
60. Phys. Rev. DM. Bando, T. Kobayashi, T. Noguchi, and K. Yoshioka, 63, 113017 (2001).
61. J. Kubo and H. Terao, Phys. Rev. D 66, 116003 (2002).
62. K-S. Choi, K-Y. Choi, and J.E. Kim, Phys. Rev. D 68, 035003 (2003)
63. K.-Y. Choi, J.E. Kim, and H.M. Lee, J. High Energy Phys. 06, 040 (2003).
64. T.R. Taylor and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B 212, 147 (1988); see also Ref. [32].
65. K. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, Nucl. Phys. B537, 47 (1999).
66. T. Kobayashi, J. Kubo, M. Mondragon, and G. Zoupanos, Nucl. Phys. B550, 99 (1999).
67. S. Ejiri, J. Kubo, and M. Murata, Phys. Rev. D 62, 105025 (2000).
68. Nonuniversalities of the soft terms induced by the Yukawa couplings have been studied in the four-dimensional GUT models R. Barbieri and L.J. Hall, Phys. Lett. B 338, 212 (1994)
69. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, and A. Strumia, Nucl. Phys. B445, 219 (1995)
70. Nucl. Phys.R. BarbieriL.J. HallA. StrumiaB449, 437 (1995)
71. Nucl. Phys.P. Ciafaloni, A. Romanino, and A. Strumia, B458, 3 (1996)
72. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Lett. B 391, 341 (1997)
73. J. Hisano, D. Nomura, Y. Okada, Y. Shimizu, and M. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. D 58, 116010 (1998)
74. J. Hisano, D. Nomura, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 437, 351 (1998).
75. J. Kubo, H. Terao, and G. Zoupanos, Nucl. Phys. B574, 495 (2000).
76. K.R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 061601 (2003).
77. G.F. Giudice and A. Masireo, Phys. Lett. B 206, 480 (1988).
78. Also in Ref. 7, this sort of supersymmetry breaking is discussed.
79. A. Anisimov, M. Dine, M. Graesser, and S. Thomas, Phys. Rev. D 65, 105011 (2002)
80. A. AnisimovM. DineM. GraesserS. ThomasJ. High Energy Phys. 0203, 036 (2002).
81. If the source of supersymmetry breaking is assumed only at the hidden sector brane, then the dynamical alignment does not occur. The point is to assume supersymmetry breaking terms in the bulk interactions.
82. A. Hebecker and J. March-Russell, Phys. Lett. B 539, 119 (2002).
83. Recently the SSB parameters in a 5D SU(5) GUT model with one extra dimension compactified on (Formula presented) have been considered in the second paper of [30]. The authors also reported that the compactification scale can be lowered and, therefore, enough alignment in the SSB parameters can be realized.
84. But we will not take the mass of the bottom quark very seriously. It becomes larger than its experimental value.
85. L.J. Hall, Y. Nomura, and A. Pierce, Phys. Lett. B 538, 359 (2002).
86. In practice, (Formula presented) turns out to be smaller than the bound as long as we use the bi-maximal form of the (Formula presented) matrix given by Eq. (44). However the more viable form of (Formula presented) matrix gives a sizable contribution. Anyway (Formula presented) exceeds the bound.
87. F. Borzumati and A. Masiero, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 961 (1986).
88. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 357, 579 (1995)
89. J. Hisano, T. Moroi, K. Tobe, and M. Yamaguchi, Phys. Rev. D 53, 2442 (1996)
90. Phys. Rev. DJ. Hisano and D. Nomura, 59, 116005 (1999)
91. W. Buchmüller, D. Delepine, and F. Vissani, Phys. Lett. B 459, 171 (1999)
92. M.E. Gomez, G.K. Leontaris, S. Lola, and J.D. Vergados, Phys. Rev. D 59, 116009 (1999)
93. J.R. Ellis, M.E. Gomez, G.K. Leontaris, S. Lola, and D.V. Nanopoulos, Eur. Phys. J. C 14, 319 (2000)
94. W. Buchmüller, D. Delepine, and L.T. Handoko, Nucl. Phys. B576, 445 (2000)
95. J.L. Feng, Y. Nir, and Y. Shadmi, Phys. Rev. D 61, 113005 (2000)
96. J. Sato, K. Tobe, and T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B 498, 189 (2001)
97. J. Sato and K. Tobe, Phys. Rev. D 63, 116010 (2001)
98. S. Lavignac, I. Masina, and C.A. Savoy, Nucl. Phys. B633, 139 (2002).
99. T. Moroi, J. High Energy Phys. 0003, 019 (2000)
100. T. MoroiPhys. Lett. B 493, 366 (2000)
101. N. Akama, Y. Kiyo, S. Komine, and T. Moroi, Phys. Rev. D 64, 095012 (2001)
102. Phys. Rev. DS. Baek, T. Goto, Y. Okada, and K.I. Okumura, 63, 051701 (2001)
103. Phys. Rev. DT. Goto, Y. Okada, Y. Shimizu, T. Shindou, and M. Tanaka, 66, 035009 (2002)
104. D. Chang, A. Masiero, and H. Murayama, Phys. Rev. D 67, 075013 (2003)
105. J. Hisano and Y. Shimizu, Phys. Lett. B 565, 183 (2003).