The phytoplankton of Lake Atnsjøen, Norway - A long-term investigation

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 521, Issue 1-3, 2004, Pages 141-147

  Brettum, Pål ^a   Halvorsen, Gunnar ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR WATER RESEARCH   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biovolume; Long term; Oligotrophy; Phytoplankton; Seasonal variations; Species composition

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BIODIVERSITY; COMPOSITION; DATA REDUCTION; FLOODS;

CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS (CCA); PHYTOPLANKTON;

LAKES;

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; OLIGOTROPHIC ENVIRONMENT; PHYTOPLANKTON; SEASONAL VARIATION;

EURASIA; EUROPE; LAKE ATNSJOEN; NORTHERN EUROPE; NORWAY; SCANDINAVIA;

ALGAE; CHRYSOPHYCEAE; CRYPTOMONAS; CRYPTOPHYTA; DINOBRYON; DINOBRYON BORGEI; DINOBRYON CRENULATUM; DINOBRYON CYLINDRICUM; EUKARYOTA; KATHABLEPHARIS OVALIS; RHODOMONAS LACUSTRIS;

EID: 3543028704     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:HYDR.0000026356.09421.e3     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brettum, P., 1972. The Phytoplankton of Lake Øvre Heimdalsvatn, central South Norway. Norwegian Journal Botany 19: 79-90.
2. Brettum. P., 1989. Alger som indikator på vannkvalitet i norske innsjøer. Planteplankton. NIVA rapport 2344: 1-111 (in Norwegian).
3. De Bernardi, R., G. Giussani, M. Manca & D. Ruggiu, 1988. Long-term dynamics of plankton communities in Lago Maggiore (N. Italy). Verhandlungen der internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 23: 729-733.
4. Elliott, J. M., 1990. The need for long-term investigations in ecology and contribution of the Freshwater Biological Association. Freshwater Biology 23: 1-5.
5. Fagernæs, K., 1989. Artssammensetning og sesongvariasjoner i fytoplanktonet i Atnsjøen 1987. MVU-rapport (no number). 16 pp. (in Norwegian)
6. Gophen, M., S. Serruya & S. Therelkeld, 1990. Long term patterns in nutrients, phytoplankton and zooplankton of Lake Kinneret and future predictions for ecosystem structure. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 118: 449-160.
7. Hessen, D. O., B. A. Faafeng & T. Andersen, 1995. Replacement of herbivore zooplankton species along gradients of ecosystem productivity and fish predation pressure. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences 52: 733-742.
8. Holtan, H., P. Brettum, B. Hals & G. Holtan, 1982. Glåma i Hedmark. Delrapport om innsjøer. Undersøkelser i tidsrommet 1978-1980. NIVA Rapport 1397: 1-96 (in Norwegian).
9. Lund, J. W. G., C. Kipling & E. D. Le Cren, 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers, and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143-170.
10. McCune, B., 1997. Influence of noisy environmental data on canonical correspodence analysis. Ecology 78: 2617-2623.
11. Nordli, P. Ø. & A. A. Grimenes, 2004. The climate of Atndalen. Hydrobiologia 521: 7-20.
12. Olrik, K., P. Blomqvist, P. Brettum, G. Cronberg & P. Eloranta, 1998. Methods for Quantitative Assessment of Phytoplankton in Freshwaters, Part I. Report from Naturvårdsverket, Sweden, no. 4860, 86 pp.
13. Palmer, M. W., 1993. Putting things into even better order; the advantages of canonical correspondence analysis. Ecology 74: 2215-2230.
14. Rott, E., 1981. Some results from phytoplankton counting intercalibrations. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrologie 43: 34-62.
15. Tangen, K. & P. Brettum, 1978. Phytoplankton and pelagic primary productivity in Øvre Heimdalsvatn. Holarctic Ecology 1: 128-147.
16. Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1986. Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology 67: 1167-1179.
17. Tvede, A. M., 2004. Hydrology of Lake Atnsjøen and River Atna. Hydrobiologia 521: 21-34.
18. Utermöhl, H., 1958. Zur Vervollkommung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-Methodik. Mitteilungen der internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 9: 1-38.
19. Venrick, E. L., 1978. How many cells to count? In Sournia, A. (ed.), Phytoplankton Manual. Monographies on Oceanographic Methodology 6, UNESCO Paris: 167-180.