Effects of incentive and preparation time on performance and classification accuracy of standard and malingering-specific memory tests

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 817-823

  Shum, David H K ^a   O'Gorman, John G ^a   Alpar, Arlene ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Malingering; Memory impairment; Memory tests

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTION TEST; HUMAN; MALE; MALINGERING; MEMORY; MOTIVATION; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 3543028112     PISSN: 08876177     EISSN: 18735843     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acn.2003.10.002     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bernard L.C. Prospects for faking believable memory deficits on neuropsychological tests and the use of incentives in simulation research. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 12:1990;715-728
2. Bianchini K., Mathias C.W., Greve K.W. Symptom validity testing: A critical review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 15:2001;19-45
3. Frederick R.I., Sarfaty S.D., Johnston J.D., Powel J. Validation of a detector of response bias on a forced-choice test of nonverbal ability. Neuropsychology. 8:1994;118-125
4. Guilmette T.J., Hart K., Giuliano A.J., Leininger B.E. Detecting simulated memory impairment: Comparison of the Rey Fifteen-Item Test and the Hiscock forced-choice procedure. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 8:1994;283-294
5. Iverson G.L., Franzen M.D. Detecting malingered memory deficits with the Recognition Memory Test. Brain Injury. 12:1998;275-282
6. Johnson J.L., Lesniak-Karpiak K. The effect of warning on malingering on memory and motor tasks in college samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 12:1997;231-238
7. Martin R.C., Bolter J.F., Todd M.E., Gouvier W.D., Niccolls R. Effects of sophistication and motivation on the detection of malingered memory performance using a computerized force-choice task. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 15:1993;867-880
8. Martin R.C., Hayes J.S., Gouvier W.D. Differential vulnerability between postconcussion self-report and objective malingering tests in identifying simulated mild head injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 18:1996;265-275
9. Niccolls, R., & Bolter, J. (1991). Multi-Digit Memory Test (computer version). Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.
10. Orey S.A., Cragar D.E., Berry D.T.R. The effects of two motivational manipulations on the neuropsychological performance of mildly head-injured college students. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 15:2000;335-348
11. Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France.
12. Rose F.E., Hall S., Szalda-Petree A.D., Bach P.J. A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 13:1998;349-363
13. Vickery C.D., Berry D.T.R., Inman T.H., Harris M.J., Orey S.A. Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic review of selected procedures. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. 16:2001;45-73
14. Wechsler, D. A. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale - Revised manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.