Corrections to scaling are large for droplets in two-dimensional spin glasses

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 90, Issue 12, 2003, Pages

  Hartmann, A K ^a   Moore, M A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; CHEMICAL BONDS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DROP FORMATION; GROUND STATE; HAMILTONIANS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIZATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS; RANDOM PROCESSES;

BOUNDARY SPINS; DROPLET ENERGIES; ISING SPIN; TWO DIMENSIONAL SPIN GLASS;

SPIN GLASS;

EID: 3543025618     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. W.L. McMillan, J. Phys. C 17, 3179 (1984).
2. A.J. Bray and M. A. Moore, in Glassy Dynamics and Optimization, edited by J.L. van Hemmen and I. Morgenstern (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1986).
3. D.S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1601 (1986)
4. Phys. Rev. B 38, 386 (1988).
5. G. Parisi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1754 (1979)
6. J. Phys. A 13, 1101 (1980)
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1946 (1983).
8. M. Mézard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
9. E. Marinari, G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, and F. Zuliani, J. Stat. Phys. 98, 973 (2000).
10. J. R. Banavar and M. Cieplak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 832 (1982)
11. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 17, L463 (1984)
12. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. B 30, 476 (1984)
13. A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. E 59, 84 (1999).
14. A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. E 60, 5135 (1999)
15. K. Hukushima, Phys. Rev. E 60, 3606 (1999).
16. N. Kawashima and H. Rieger, Europhys. Lett. 39, 85 (1997).
17. A. K. Hartmann and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094419 (2002).
18. A. K. Hartmann and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 64, 180404 (2001).
19. A very extensive review of the 2D spin-glass problem has been given by N. Kawashima, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 987 (2000).
20. N. Kawashima, cond-mat/9910366.
21. M. Picco, F. Ritort, and M. Sales, cond-mat/0106554; cond-mat/0210576.
22. J. Lamarcq, J.-P. Bouchaud, O.C. Martin, and M. Mézard, Europhys. Lett. 58, 321 (2002)
23. J. Lamarcq, J.-P. Bouchaud, and O. C. Martin, cond-mat/0208100.
24. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3013 (2000).
25. M. Palassini and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3017 (2000).
26. A. C. Carter, A. J. Bray, and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077201 (2002).
27. J. Houdayer, F. Krzakala, and O. C. Martin, Eur. Phys. J. B 18, 467 (2000).
28. A. K. Hartmann and H. Rieger, Optimization Algorithms in Physics (Wiley-VCH, Berlin, 2001).
29. I. Bieche, R. Maynard, R. Rammal, and J. P. Uhry, J. Phys. A 13, 2553 (1980).
30. 2 is worse than or equal to the current fit, i.e., a small value indicates a bad fit while Q = 1 means that all data points are straight on the fitting function. W.H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W.T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in C (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1995).
31. A. A. Middleton, Phys. Rev. B 63, 060202 (2001).