Specific and reactive sensitivities of skin resistance response and respiratory apnea in a japanese concealed information test (CIT) of criminal guilt

Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 202-209

  Suzuki, Reiko ^a   Nakayama, Makoto ^a,c   Furedy, John J ^b  

^a Forensic Science Laboratory   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c Forensic Science Laboratory   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543020297     PISSN: 0008400X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087230     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barland, G. H., & Raskin, D. C. (1973). The use of electrodermal activity in the detection of deception. In W. F. Prokasy & D. C. Raskin (Eds.), Electrodermal activity in psychological research. New York: Academic Press.
2. Barry, R. J., & Furedy, J. J. (1993). Stimulus intensity and novelty interact in elicitation of the phasic electrodermal orienting response. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 14, 249-54.
3. Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Future prospects of psychophysiological detection: Replacing the CQT by the GKT. In J. Jennings, M. Coles, & P. Acles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: Vol. 4. London: Kingsley.
4. Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: Psychophysiological and cultural perspectives. New York: Springer-Verlag.
5. Bitterman, M. E., Reed, P., & Krauskopf, J. (1952). The effect of the duration of the unconditioned stimulus upon conditioning and extinction. American Journal of Psychology, 65, 256-62.
6. Furedy, J. J. (1987). Beyond heart-rate in the cardiac psychophysiological assessment of mental effort: The T-wave amplitude component of the electrocardiogram. Human Factors, 29, 183-94.
7. Furedy, J. J. (1996a). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: Disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 97-105.
8. Furedy, J. J. (1996b). Some elementary distinctions, and comments concerning, the "control" question "test" polygrapher's many problems. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 97-102
9. Furedy, J. J. (2002). IRBs: Ethics, yes - epistemology, no. American Psychological Society Observer, February issue.
10. Furedy, J. J., & Heslegrave, R. J. (1991a). The forensic use of the polygraph: A psychophysiological analysis of current trends and future prospects. In J. Jennings, M. Coles, & P. Acles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: Vol. 4. London: Kingsley.
11. Furedy, J. J., & Heslegrave, R. J. (1991b). A reply to commentators: Some elaborations on the specific effects orientation's application to the North American CQT polygraph. In J. Jennings, M. Coles, & P. Acles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: Vol. 4. London: Kingsley.
12. Furedy, J. J., Heslegrave, R. J., & Scher, H. (1992). T-wave amplitude utility revisited: Some physiological and psychophysiological considerations. Biological Psychology, 33, 241-48.
13. Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-388.
14. Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. Anterican Psychologist, 29, 725-739.
15. Lykken, D. T. (1981). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum Press.
16. Nakayama, M. (2001). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In K. Murray (Ed.), The handbook of polygraph test (pp.89-86). London: Academic Press.
17. Nakayama, M., & Yamamura, T. (1990). Changes of respiration pattern to the critical question on guilty knowl-. edge technique. Polygraph, 19, 188-198.
18. Saxe, L. (1991). Science and the CQT polygraph: A theoretical critique. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 223-31.