Probability in the grammar of German and Dutch: Interfixation in triconstituent compounds

Language and Speech

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 83-106

  Krott, Andrea ^a   Libben, Gary ^b   Jarema, Gonia ^c   Dressler, Wolfgang ^d   Schreuder, Robert ^e   Baayen, Harald ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Compound structure; Distributional properties; Interfixes multiconstituent compounds; Separation hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 3543004114     PISSN: 00238309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00238309040470010401     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. ALBRIGHT, A., & HAYES, B. (2001). Rules versus analogy in English past tenses: A computational/experimental study. Unpublished Manuscript.
2. ARONOFF, M., & FUHRHOP, N. (2002). Restricting suffix combinations in English: Closing suffixes and the monosuffix constraint. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(3), 451-490.
3. BAAYEN, R. H., PIEPENBROCK, R., & GULIKERS, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM), Linguistic Data Consortium. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania.
4. BOD, R., HAY, J. B., & JANNEDY, S. (2002). Probability theory in linguistics. Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.
5. BOERSMA, P., & HAYES, B. (2001). Empirical tests of the gradual learning algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45-86.
6. BOOIJ, G. E. (2002). The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. DRESSLER, W., KILANI-SCHOCH, M., & KLAMPFER, S. (in press). How does a small child detect morphology. In R. H. Baayen & R. Schreuder (Eds.), Morphological structure in language processing. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
8. DRESSLER, W. U., LIEBEN, G., STARK, J., PONS, C., & JAREMA, G. (2001). The processing of interfixed German compounds. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1999 (pp. 185-220). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. ERNESTUS, M., & BAAYEN, R. (in press). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch. Language.
10. FLEISCHER, W. (1976). Wortbildung der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.
11. FUHRHOP, N. (1998). Grenzfälle Morphologischer Einheiten (Border Cases of Morphological Units). Tuebingen: Stauffenburg.
12. FUHRHOP, N. (2000). Zeigen Fugenelemente die Morphologisierung von Komposita an? In R. Thieroff, M. Tamrat, N. Fuhrhop, & O. Teuber (Eds.), Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 201-213). Tuebingen: Max Niemeyer.
13. GRIMM, J. (1878). Deutsche Grammatik. Hildesheim: Olms.
14. HAIDER, H. (2001). Riesengratulationskompositum - *Kompositumgratulationsriesen or: Why are there no complex head-initial compounds? In C. Schaner-Wolles, J. Rennison, & F. Neubarth (Eds.), Naturally! Linguistic studies in honor of Wolfgang Ulrich Dressler (pp. 165-174). Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.
15. KROTT, A. (2001). Analogy in morphology: The selection of linking elements in Dutch compounds. University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen.
16. KROTT, A., BAAYEN, R. H., & SCHREUDER, R. (2001). Analogy in morphology: Modeling the choice of linking morphemes in Dutch. Linguistics, 39(1), 51-93.
17. KROTT, A., SCHREUDER, R., & BAAYEN, R. H. (2002). A note on the function of Dutch linking elements. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marie (Eds.), Yearbook of Morphology 2001 (pp. 237-252). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
18. LIEBEN, G., JAREMA, G., DRESSLER, W., STARK, J., & PONS, C. (2002). Triangulating the effects of interfixation in the processing of German compounds. Folia Linguistica, 26, 23-43.
19. ORTNER, L., & MÜLLER-BOLLHAGEN, E. (1991). Deutsche Wortbildung. Vierter Hauptteil: Deutsche Substantivkomposita. Berlin: De Gruyter.
20. SCHREUDER, R., NEIJT, A., Van der WEIDE, F., & BAAYEN, R. H. (1998). Regular plurals in Dutch compounds: Linking graphemes or morphemes? Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 551-573.
21. WILLIAMS, E. (1981). On the notions ́ lexically related" and ́ head of a word." Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 245-274.
22. ŽEPIĆ, S. (1970). Morphologie und Semantik der deutschen Nominalkomposita. Zagreb: Philosophische Fakultät der Universität Zagreb.