The finite difference scheme for 3d mathematical modeling of a wood drying process

Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 125-137

  Čiegis, Raimondas ^a   Starikovičius, Vadimas ^b  

^a VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

^b VILNIUS UNIVERSITY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

Finite difference scheme; Robin boundary conditions; Splitting method; Wood drying

Indexed keywords

EID: 3542999081     PISSN: 16094840     EISSN: 16099389     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2478/cmam-2001-0009     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A. Aboltinš, A. Buikis, J. Cepitis, H. Kalis, and A. Reinfelds, Diffusion and chemical attachment of substances with simple molecular structure in wood, in: Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI98, B. G. Teubner, Leipzig, 1999, pp. 188-195.
2. X. Bui, E. Choong, and W. Rudd, Numerical methods for solving the equation for diffusion through wood during drying, Wood Science, 13 (1991), No. 2.
3. R.Čiegis, A. Papastavrou, and A. Zemitis, Additive splitting methods for elliptic-parabolic problems, Ann. Univ. Ferrara-Sez. VII-Sc. Mat., XLVI (2000), pp. 291-306.
4. R. Čiegis and V. Starikovicius, The finite difference scheme for wood drying process, Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 6 (2001), No. 1, pp. 48-57.
5. R. Čiegis and A. Zemitis, Parallel numerical methods for elliptic-parabolic problems, in: Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI98, B. G.Teubner, Stuttgart, Leipzig, 1999, pp. 206-213.
6. A. Droin-Josser and, J. Taverdet, and J. Vergrand, Modeling the absorption and desorption of moisture by wood in an atmosphere of constant and programmed relative humidity, Wood Sci. Technol., 22 (1988), pp. 299-310.
7. S. A. Dzhangirova, Convergence of the summary approximation method for certain nonlinear equations of parabolic type, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 27 (1987), No. 8, pp. 1176-1183, in Russian.
8. R. E. Ewing and H. Wang, A summary of numerical methods for time-dependent advection-dominated partial differential equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 128 (2001), No. 1-2, pp. 423-445.
9. I. V. Fryazinov, About the solution of the third type boundary-value problem for a two dimensional heat equation in an arbitrary domain by a locally one-dimensional method, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 6 (1966), No. 3, pp. 487-502, in Russian.
10. I. V. Fryazinov, The economical schemes for a heal equation with the third type boundary conditions, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 12 (1972), No. 3, pp. 612-626, in Russian.
11. D. G. Gordesiani and G. V. Meladze, About simulation of the third type boundary value problem for multidimensional parabolic equations in an arbitrary domain by the one-dimensional equations, Zh. Vychisl. Mat. Mat. Fiz., 14 (1974), No. 1, pp. 246-250, in Russian.
12. M. Hilden and G. Steinebach, ENO-discretization in MOL-applications: some examples in river hydraulics, Appl. Numer. Math., 28 (1998), pp. 293-308.
13. A. A. Samarskii, Theory of Difference Schemes, Nauka, Moscow, 1988, in Russian.
14. A. A. Samarskii and P. N. Vabishchevich, The Numerical Methods for Solving Convection-Diffusion Problems, Editorial URRS, Moscow, 1999, in Russian.
15. W. T. Simpson and J. Y. Liu, An optimization technique to determine red oak surface and internal moisture transfer coefficients during drying, Wood and Fiber Science, 29 (1997), pp. 312-318.
16. J. Thomas, Numerical Partial Differential Equations: Finite Difference Methods, Springer, New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, Tokyo, 1995.