A partial revolution: The diplomatic ethos and transparency in intergovernmental organizations

Public Administration Review

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 410-424

  Roberts, Alasdair ^a,b,c  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Campbell Public Affairs Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3542998692     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00388.x     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. ActionAid. 2000. Recommendations for Ways Forward on Institutional Reform of the World Trade Organization. London: ActionAid.
2. Alterman, Eric. 1998. Who Speaks for America? Why Democracy Matters in Foreign Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
3. Archer, Clive. 2001. International Organizations. London: Routledge.
4. Arthurs, Harry. 1997. Mechanical Arts and Merchandise: Canadian Public Administration in the New Economy. McGill Law Journal 42(1): 29-62.
5. Bank Information Center. 2001. The Ongoing Struggle for World Bank Transparency: The Outcome of the Information Disclosure Policy Review. Bank Information Center Update, November 4. http://www.bicusa.org/bicusa/issues/misc_ resources/456.php.
6. Barshefsky, Charlene. 1999. The Trading System of the 21st Century. Speech delivered to the Economic Strategy Institute Conference, April 28, Washington, DC.
7. Baucus, Max. 2002. Letter to the Honorable Robert B. Zoellick, United States Trade Representative, April 15. Washington, DC: Office of Senator Max Baucus.
8. Berridge, G. R. 2002. Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave.
9. Blanton, Thomas. 2002. The World's Right to Know. Foreign Policy 131(July/August): 50-58.
10. Blustein, Paul. 2001. The Chastening: Inside the Crisis that Rocked the Global Financial System and Humbled the IMF. New York: Public Affairs.
11. Bretton Woods Project. 2003. Briefing Note: G-7, Civil Society Press for IMF, World Bank Transparency Reforms. London: ActionAid.
12. Camdessus, Michel. 1998. Toward an Agenda for International Monetary and Financial Reform. Remarks to the World Affairs Council, November 6, Philadelphia, PA.
13. Canada. 2003. Communication from Canada on the Improvement of the Dispute Settlement Understanding. Geneva: World Trade Organization. TN/DS/W/41.
14. Chamberlain, Chris. 1999. Fulfilling the IDA-12 Mandates: Recommendations for Expanding Public Access to Information at the World Bank. Washington, DC: Bank Information Center. http://www.bicusa.org/bicusa/issues/misc_resources/ 462.php.
15. Clark, Peter, and Peter Morrison. 1998. Key Procedural Issues: Transparency. International Lawyer 32: 851.
16. Coalition for Open Trade. 2000. Public Participation Barred Once Again in WTO Dispute Settlement. Tradewatch Bulletin, March 6. http://www.dbtrade.com/ licit/.
17. Debevoise, Whitney. 1998. Key Procedural Issues: Transparency. International Lawyer 32: 817.
18. Doyle, Kate. 2002. Mexico Opens the Files. The Nation, August 5, 7.
19. Draper, Theodore. 1991. A Very Thin Line: The Iran-Contra Affairs. New York: Hill and Wang.
20. Elster, Jon. 1995. Strategic Uses of Argument. In Barriers to the Negotiated Resolution of Conflict, edited by K. J. Arrow, 236-57. New York: W.W. Norton.
21. European Community. 2002. Communication from the European Community to the Working Group on Trade and Investment: Concept Paper on Transparency. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/WGTI/W/110.
22. European Union (EU). 2001. Regulation on Public Access to Documents. Brussels: European Union. (EC) 1049/2001.
23. Fischer, Stanley. 2001. Farewell to the IMF Board. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
24. Florini, Ann. 1999. Transparency in the Interests of the Poor. Washington, DC: World Bank Summer Research Workshop on Poverty.
25. Fox, Francis. 1980. Cabinet Discussion Paper on Access to Information. In The Complete Annotated Guide to Federal Access to Information, edited by M. Drapeau and M.A. Racicot, 92-120. Toronto: Carswell.
26. Francois, Joseph F. 1999. Maximizing the Benefits of the Trade Policy Review Mechanism for Developing Countries. Rotterdam/London: Tinbergen Institute/Centre for Economic Policy and Research.
27. Gill, Stephen. 2000. The Constitution of Global Capitalism. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, March 14-18, Los Angeles, CA.
28. Group of Independent Experts. 1999. External Evaluation of IMF Surveillance. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
29. Hewart, Gordon. 1929. The New Despotism. London: Benn.
30. Horwitz, Morton. 1992. The Transformation of American Law, 1870-1960. New York: Oxford University Press.
31. International Centre for Sustainable Trade and Development (ICSTD). 1999. Accreditation Schemes and Other Arrangements for Public Participation in International Fora. Geneva: International Centre for Sustainable Trade and Development.
32. _. 2002a. DSU Review: Developing Countries Reject U.S. Proposal on Transparency. Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, September 18. http://www.ictsd.org/weekly/.
33. _. 2002b. EC Proposal under Scrutiny in DSU Negotiations. Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, April 23. http:// www.ictsd.org/weekly/.
34. _. 2002c. Members Divided over Transparency, Definition at WTO Investment Talks. Bridges Weekly Trade News Digest, April 23. http://www.ictsd.org/weekly/ .
35. International Monetary Fund (IMF). 2001a. Assessing the Implementation of Standards - An IMF Review of Experience and Next Steps. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. PIN 01/17.
36. _. 2001b. IMF Reviews the Experience with Publication of Staff Reports and Takes Decisions to Enhance Transparency. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund. PIN 01/3.
37. _. 2001e. IMF Surveillance: A Factsheet. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
38. _. 2002. Quarterly Report on the Assessments of Standards and Codes - June 2002. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund, Policy Development and Review Department.
39. _. 2003. The Fund's Transparency Policy: Progress Report on Publication of Country Documents. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
40. Japan. 2002. Communication from Japan to the Working Group on Trade and Investment on Transparency. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/WGTI/W/112.
41. Keesing, Donald B. 1998. Improving Trade Policy Reviews in the World Trade Organization. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.
42. Kuttner, Robert. 2001. The Role of Governments in the Global Economy. In On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, edited by W. Hutton and A. Giddens, 147-63. London: Vintage.
43. Larsen, Flemming. 2002. The Global Financial Architecture in Transition. OECD Observer, March 11, 10-12.
44. Marchi, Sergio, 1998. Statement at the Second Session of the WTO Ministerial Conference, May 20. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
45. Mavroidis, Petros. 2001. Amicus Curiae Briefs before the WTO: Much Ado about Nothing. Working paper, Harvard Law School.
46. McIntosh, Toby 2002. Release of Secret Loan Document in Uruguay Fuels Public Debate. http://www.freedominfo.org.
47. Morgenthau, Hans. 1954. Politics among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
48. Nader, Ralph, and Lori Wallach. 1996. GATT, NAFTA, and the Subversion of the Democratic Process. In The Case against the Global Economy, edited by J. Mander and E. Goldsmith, 92-107. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
49. Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR). 1998. 1998 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program. Washington, DC: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
50. _. 2000. U.S. Pushes for Increased Transparency in the WTO. News release, October 10.
51. Oxfam UK. 2000. Discussion Paper: Institutional Reform of the WTO. Oxford, UK: Oxfam UK.
52. Pauly, Louis. 1997. Who Elected the Bankers? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
53. Picciotto, Sol. 2000. Democratizing Globalism. Working paper, Lancaster University.
54. Qureshi, Asif. 1995. Some Lessons from Developing Countries' Trade Policy Reviews in the GATT Framework: An Enforcement Perspective. World Economy 18(3): 489-503.
55. Raghavan, Chakravarthi. 2000a. Continuing Conceptual Divides at the WTO. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
56. _. 2000b. NGOs Launch "Shrink or Sink" Campaign against WTO. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
57. Roberts, Alasdair. 2001. Structural Pluralism and the Right to Information. University of Toronto Law Journal 51(3): 243-71.
58. Rosenbloom, David H. 2000. Building a Legislative-Centered Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
59. Rozell, Mark. 1994. Executive Privilege. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
60. Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
61. Stiglitz, Joseph. 2000. What I Learned at the World Economic Crisis. New Republic, April 17, 56-60.
62. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 1997. Public Information Disclosure Policy. New York: UNDP.
63. _. 2002. Human Development Report 2002: Deepening Democracy in a Fragmented World. New York: Oxford University Press.
64. United States. 2000. Submission Regarding Informal Consultations on External Transparency. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/W/413/Rev.1.
65. _. 2002. Communication from the United States on the Improvement of the Dispute Settlement Understanding of the WTO Related to Transparency. Geneva: World Trade Organization. TN/DS/W/13.
66. United States and Canada. 1998. Revised Proposals on Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/W/106.
67. U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). 1999. Brief for the Petitioners in the Case of U.S. v. Weatherhead. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
68. U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). 1998. Multilateral Development Banks: Public Consultation on Environmental Assessments. Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. GAO/NSIAD-98-192.
69. U.S. Mission. 1999. Communication to the Working Group on the Interaction between Trade and Competition Policy. Geneva: United States Permanent Mission to the WTO.
70. Van Houtven, Leo. 2002. Governance of the IMF. Pamphlet 53. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
71. Watson, Adam. 1983. Diplomacy: The Dialogue between States. New York: McGraw-Hill.
72. Weiler, J. H. H. 2000. The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement. Working paper, Harvard Law School.
73. Weiner, John, and L. Brennan Van Dyke. 1997. A Handbook for Obtaining Documents from the World Trade Organization. Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development.
74. Wildavsky, Aaron B. 1969. The Presidency. Boston: Little, Brown.
75. World Bank. 2001. World Bank Revises Disclosure Policy. Press release, September 7.
76. _. 2002. The World Bank Policy on Disclosure of Information. Washington, DC: World Bank.
77. World Trade Organization (WTO). 1996a. Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/L/160/Rev.1.
78. _. 1996b. Singapore Ministerial Declaration. Geneva: World Trade Organization.
79. _. 2000. Minutes of Meeting of the General Council Held on 22 November 2000. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/M/60.
80. _. 2001a. Draft Decision: Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/W/464.
81. _. 2001b. Report of the Appellate Body: European Communities - Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos-Containing Products. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/ DS135/AB/R.
82. _. 2002a. Director-General's Farewell Speech to the WTO General Council. Press release, July 31.
83. _. 2002b. Minutes of Meeting of the General Council held on 13-14 May 2002. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/ GC/M/74.
84. _. 2002c. Moore Pledges to Build on Doha Success in 2002, Press release, January 2.
85. _. 2002d. Revised Procedures for the Circulation and Derestriction of WTO Documents. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/L/452.
86. World Trade Organization, Agriculture Committee. 1999. Summary Report of the Meeting Held on 25-26 March 1999. Geneva: World Trade Organization. G/AG/R/18.
87. World Trade Organization, General Council. 1998. Minutes of Meeting of the General Council. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/M/28.
88. _. 2001. Minutes of Meeting Held on 18 and 19 July 2001. Geneva: World Trade Organization. WT/GC/M/66.
89. Zoellick, Robert. 2001. The United States, Europe and the World Trading System. Address to the Kangaroo Group, May 15, Strasbourg, France.