Importance of REP values when comparing the CALUX bioassay results with chemoanalyses results: Example with spiked vegetable oils

Talanta

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1255-1259

  Carbonnelle, Sophie ^a   Loco, Joris Van ^a   Overmeire, Ilse Van ^a   Windal, Isabelle ^a   Wouwe, Nathalie Van ^a   Leeuwen, Stefan Van ^b   Goeyens, Leo ^a  

^a SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Belgium)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chemical activated luciferase gene expression (CALUX); Dioxins; PCBs; Relative potencies (REP)

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; CHEMICAL ACTIVATION; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); GENES; TOXIC MATERIALS;

CHEMOANALYSES; COGENERS;

BIOASSAY;

DIOXIN; POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYL; VEGETABLE OIL;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOASSAY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING;

EID: 3542996862     PISSN: 00399140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2004.05.029     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Van Overmeire I., Clark G.C., Brown D.J., Chu M.D., Cooke W.M., Denison M.S., Baeyens W., Srebrnik S., Goeyens L. Environ. Sci. Policy. 4:2001;345-357
2. Van den Berg M., Birnbaum L., Bosveld A., Brunström B., Cook F., Feeley M., Giesy J.P., Hanberg A., Hasegawa R., Kenedy S.W., Kubiak T., Larsen J.C., van Leeuwen F., Liem A., Nolt C., Petterson R., Poellinger L., Safe S., Schrenk D., Tillitt D., Tysklind M., Younes M., Waern F., Zacharewski T. Environ. Health Perspect. 106:1998;775-792
3. Brown D.J., Chu M., Van Overmeire I., Chu A., Clark G.C. Organohalogen Compd. 53:2001;211-214
4. P. Behnisch, K. Hosoe, S. Sakai, Environment International, 2001, pp. 495-519.
5. http://www.dioxins.nl/difference/.
6. Council Directive 2001/102/EC of 27 November 2001.
7. Council Regulation (EC) No 2375/2001 of 29 November 2001.